This is a thread to apply logical conclusions to random subjects.
For example, I was watching a walkthrough of L.A. Noire to see what it's like but stopped after a while when I thought the let's player was annoying... No offense, but I usually don't like player commentary. :p The guy was named Rad Brad.
One of the reasons he was kind of annoying is because he was all like "This person looks like their so full of shit" every time he thought they were lying, it was like a catchphase. :p Then around part 20 or so, some lady said some person was a good girl or whatever and that simple comment had him singing about, even to the next video saying "goooooddd girl~!"
Then people are saying he never even finished... there's only 32 parts. Not sure who else to see the walkthrough from. The people in the comments were fighting and being pretty rude too...
Finally, while he did good most of the time, he almost always seemed to have gone with his gut instead of checking over the facts of his evidence and on the very first case where you have to interrogate two suspects he arrested the wrong person. :(
Now, the point of this first line of thought from me so far is that people were getting mad at him and then others would get mad back saying he's having fun and he should play the game however he wants to.
But that's the thing... is it meant to be a matter of someone showing off their interests and having fun, or is it when it's literally stated to be a "walkthrough", it's meant to be a form of accuracy and getting things right?
I just wanted to know that...
"Hell exists not to punish sinners,
but to ensure that nobody sins
in the first place." - Eikishiki Yamaxanadu (Touhou)
This is a thread to apply logical conclusions to random subjects.
For example, I was watching a walkthrough of L.A. Noire to see what it's like but stopped after a while when I thought the let's player was annoying... No offense, but I usually don't like player commentary. :p The guy was named Rad Brad.
One of the reasons he was kind of annoying is because he was all like "This person looks like their so full of shit" every time he thought they were lying, it was like a catchphase. :p Then around part 20 or so, some lady said some person was a good girl or whatever and that simple comment had him singing about, even to the next video saying "goooooddd girl~!"
Then people are saying he never even finished... there's only 32 parts. Not sure who else to see the walkthrough from. The people in the comments were fighting and being pretty rude too...
Finally, while he did good most of the time, he almost always seemed to have gone with his gut instead of checking over the facts of his evidence and on the very first case where you have to interrogate two suspects he arrested the wrong person. :(
Now, the point of this first line of thought from me so far is that people were getting mad at him and then others would get mad back saying he's having fun and he should play the game however he wants to.
But that's the thing... is it meant to be a matter of someone showing off their interests and having fun, or is it when it's literally stated to be a "walkthrough", it's meant to be a form of accuracy and getting things right?
I just wanted to know that...
"Hell exists not to punish sinners, but to ensure that nobody sins in the first place." - Eikishiki Yamaxanadu (Touhou)