Follow TV Tropes

Following

Opinion poll on required familiarity

Go To

KSPAM PARTY PARTY PARTY I WANNA HAVE A PARTY from PARTY ROCK Since: Oct, 2009 Relationship Status: Giving love a bad name
PARTY PARTY PARTY I WANNA HAVE A PARTY
#1: Mar 27th 2014 at 5:26:18 PM

So I wanted to gather opinions from different people on a question I'm sure I'm not the first to ask. The question is this:

Do you need to be intimately familiar with (i.e. a long-time fan of) a genre in order to write any work analyzing its various tropes? Is there a metaphorical "barrier to entry" for those who are experienced with the genre, but not necessarily well-versed, or a "true believer"?

What do you think?

I've got new mythological machinery, and very handsome supernatural scenery. Goodfae: a mafia web serial
imadinosaur Since: Oct, 2011
#2: Mar 28th 2014 at 2:34:33 AM

To an extent. Just like any other field of study, you need to do research in the area in order to say anything interesting. Most physicists aren't really able to comment on biology (and vice versa). That's not the same as being a fan of the genre, but I would guess that most people with the required level of familiarity are fans.

However, it doesn't require a great deal of reading to pick up on certain things. The lack of female characters in a lot of sci-fi/fantasy, especially the older stuff; the flat nature of a lot of the characters; the loltasticness of '20th/21at century American capitalism in space forever'. So it depends on what exactly you're trying to do.

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
Nadir Ice Queen from aaronktj94@gmail.com Since: Jul, 2009 Relationship Status: Maxing my social links
Ice Queen
#3: Mar 28th 2014 at 3:14:00 AM

Not at all. You can just be a casual fan to be aware of its tropes. The important thing is (not crucial, but recommended) you have to actually see them in context, like for sci-fi, reading a sci-fi book or TV show. You don't have to be a die-hard fan, but if it's enough for you to see a trope listed on this site and go "Oh yeah, I know this one! I saw it in that one place...", then I think it's good enough to use that trope.

Of course, that's just to begin. If you want to be more thorough, then yeah, some familiarity is needed, but not to the point of utter fanboyism, I think, as it may affect your view. Fanboyism is fine if you want to just utilise a trope! Just not if you want to deconstruct it and tear it apart, as the affection may be there.

As an example, I don't usually like sci-fi, but I liked mecha and Powered Armor, and I liked girls in skintight suits, so I made a story about girls in skintight suits wearing Powered Armor, a la Infinite Stratos (not the best sci-fi example, I know). It wasn't that great compared to the other stuff I did, and I'd chalk it up mostly due to my unfamiliarity with the genre to fully and faithfully utilise it the way I want to.

edited 28th Mar '14 3:16:09 AM by Nadir

Working on a manga. With pictures! All feedback welcome!
Antiteilchen In the pursuit of great, we failed to do good. Since: Sep, 2013
In the pursuit of great, we failed to do good.
#4: Mar 28th 2014 at 8:52:58 AM

No. If your not a long-time fan, you can bring an outsiders perspective into the analysis and might even be more objective.

DeMarquis Who Am I? from Hell, USA Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Buried in snow, waiting for spring
Who Am I?
#5: Mar 28th 2014 at 9:19:10 AM

But you do need the minimum familiarity to avoid what are considered "obvious" mistakes.

"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."
Night The future of warfare in UC. from Jaburo Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: Drift compatible
The future of warfare in UC.
#6: Mar 28th 2014 at 1:06:28 PM

While knowing the proper terms of art of a series may make you more interesting to read to fans of that series, it doesn't really add anything for everyone else, or improve the quality of your efforts.

Nous restons ici.
Add Post

Total posts: 6
Top