I have a plan.
Somebody really screwed the pooch here. That Barbie doll picture and caption is just plain awful, but to think it replaced a picture that was actually a good demonstration and example baffles me. I really think we should put the original back, no crowners. I got no idea why the current pic should be kept at all.
edited 21st Aug '12 5:03:33 PM by TailsDoll
"@[=g3,8d]&fbb=-q]/hk%fg"
serial tweaker, sorry
Yep, put the original back up. Current is just horrible.
please don't capitalize my handle. I just don't like it.
The current is more Girliness Upgrade but isn't as good as the current on there
Definitely reverse image replacement. Original was the trope. This... I dunno.
Moon◊
Yeah, the new image is really awful unless you're familiar with the character and/or source. I also vote to bring back the original image.
I can't think of anything good for a signature.
Hi
I flipped the pic back...it needed to be resized, and the caption size was way bigger than it needed to be, so some good did come from this.
So, I take it that takes care of everything?
Hi
Yeah, I think we can go ahead and lock this one up.
For some reason, the former trope image was removed and later replaced with the current one. This annoys me because, not only is the new image Just A Face And A Caption, but the image it replaced seemed to illustrate the trope just fine.
So, should I just switch it back, or is there anything else that needs to be addressed first?
Former image for reference:
edited 21st Aug '12 4:45:13 PM by Sparkysharps