DarkConfidant
Since: Aug, 2011
#3: Jul 5th 2012 at 3:18:58 PM
Yep, that's definitely a watermark.
cfive
Since: Jan, 2001
#4: Jul 5th 2012 at 3:21:43 PM
Didn't even notice that. Definite pull in that case.
#5: Aug 9th 2012 at 3:23:35 AM
How's this?
#6: Aug 10th 2012 at 1:41:33 AM
That works fine.
#7: Aug 13th 2012 at 6:03:26 PM
Bump; anyone else?
#8: Aug 15th 2012 at 6:55:05 AM
One more bump...if there aren't any objections, I'm gonna go ahead and put this up.
#9: Aug 17th 2012 at 11:42:26 AM
Hearing none, the pic's up, potholed, and tagged. Locking up.
Total posts: 9
I think the current page image is good in theory, but the text is hard to read, which interferes with it's ability to demonstrate the trope. I've found a larger copy at with a width of 347 pixels.◊ All of the text is readable on this version, but it still comes across as being quite small. I suggest we either replace the current picture with the larger version or find a picture that doesn't rely on as much text.