dRoy
Professional Writer & Amateur Scholar
from Most likely from my study
Since: May, 2010
Relationship Status: I'm just high on the world
Professional Writer & Amateur Scholar
#52: Jan 29th 2012 at 2:42:19 AM
The silhouettes sealed the deal, all right.
I'm a (socialist) professional writer serializing a WWII alternate history webnovel.
HiddenFacedMatt
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
Since: Jul, 2011
Avatars may be subject to change without notice.
#53: Jan 29th 2012 at 7:41:46 AM
![[up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
But if the 300-pixel version wasn't the original, wouldn't it be better to get a 350-pixel version from the original, so as to have a bigger image while reducing artifacting?
I agree that it isn't always better to have a bigger image, but I think it's better in this case.
"The Daily Show has to be right 100% of the time; FOX News only has to be right once." - Jon Stewart
Hi
#54: Jan 29th 2012 at 7:43:00 AM
Eh, it feels a tetch premature, but that's a pretty convincing vote margin, so let's go ahead and call this. The pic is up and tagged...I've a feeling a caption would just be belittling the point, but if anyone wants to add one, go for it. Locking up.
ImagePickin:
NoHoldsBarredBeatdown
1st Jan '12 8:04:54 PM
Crown Description:
Nominations for replacement images:
Total posts: 54
Not everything has to be max size. It might look better even smaller. (I just reproduced the posted res, tho, didn't make any decisions about dimensions.) I am annoyed by the sentiment that "there's no sense" in making an image less than the maximum width, that is not true at all; some images should probably be as wide as possible, but not all of them.
edited 28th Jan '12 10:53:02 PM by rodneyAnonymous
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.