I second the pull.
Thirding the pull.
"Oh great! Let's pile up all the useless cats and hope a tree falls on them!"I dissent. The caption provides necessary context (and contrary to sometimes loudly-expressed opinion, that is allowed.)
EDIT: Actually, I think it's a moot point. Per this TRS threat, the trope will be merged with NOHAMOTYO anyway.
Jet-a-Reeno!It still can be the image for the new merged page
I oppose the pull, the caption gives the context needed to understand the concept, and the are enough visual cues that it's the same people in the same situation and at different points in time.
Opposed.
I was going to support, but I took another look at it, and I haven't even read the caption, but it looks like the same thing happening twice to me, and that's what the trope is, after all.
Maybe edit some dates into the actual image if we're looking to improve it, though.
edited 11th Dec '11 12:36:12 PM by INUH
Infinite Tree: an experimental storyTrope merging issues aside... Keep.
The words above are to be read as if they are narrated by Morgan Freeman.Keep it till something clearer can be found. It's not bad, though I WOULD like clearer images (maybe a vertical stack so we can better see WTF is going on)
Keep Until Better Image Suggested. It's not the best image but I think it fits just enough to not need to be pulled.
Adding the dates to the pic would help it.
I'd say the pic fits the spirit of the trope. The same two wrestlers fighting at a faux-grave site on two different occasions. Adding the dates to the pic would help to clarify, but the pic itself is a solid example.
Being a solid example doesn't make it a good page image. They are to help communicate the idea, not give an example above the example line.
edited 16th Jan '12 10:03:36 PM by rodneyAnonymous
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.I wanna say we could do something with this Shortpacked strip, but I'm not sure what.
edited 2nd Mar '12 4:19:43 AM by Willbyr
I think it does explain the trope. Being a solid example doesn't exactly hurt.
Too wordy, it it does a poor job of showing the trope.
Current picture is good.
The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.Clock is set.
Clock's up; locking for inactivity/lack of consensus. No action is to be taken based on this thread.
Okay, so the image on Seven-Year Rule is two shots of one wrestler fighting another. It's hardly clear from the images that these are several years apart, nor that the same story is happening in both of them, nor indeed that the guy being defeated on the left is the same as on the right.
So I don't think this demonstrates the trope, and move to pull.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!