#2: Dec 8th 2011 at 5:52:40 PM
Sometimes known as the "monkeysphere," yes?
Thank you Cracked.
Anyhow, yeah, I'd say it's relevant, though I'm not sure whether or not it's actually an accepted, proven idea yet, scientifically-speaking. If it is, it would be huge, and coincide with my hypothesis that humans are, at some base level, hopelessly selfish creatures...
I am now known as Flyboy.
#3: Dec 8th 2011 at 5:55:23 PM
I simply don't behave the way I'm supposed to behave if it works the way people say it works.
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
#4: Dec 8th 2011 at 5:56:11 PM
Short answer: yes!
If you don't like a single Frank Ocean song, you have no soul.
DeMarquis
Since: Feb, 2010
#5: Dec 8th 2011 at 6:57:59 PM
Well, it's an average. There is a huge variation in the number of relationships that different people can manage. Most people know several dozen others on a first name basis at any one time. There are a very few people who know hundreds.
Total posts: 5
Is it relevant to our daily lives or our current society?
Is Dunbar's number representative of how many people we can "conceive of as people instead of one dimensional characters" like a certain cracked article argued, or does it tell us how many stable and consistent relationships we can carry on socially at a time?
There seems to be a lot of confusion with what this concept actually entails, me included, so here's a link to wikipedia just because.
edited 8th Dec '11 6:04:11 PM by ViralLamb
Power corrupts. Knowledge is Power. Study hard. Be evil.