Follow TV Tropes

Following

Dunbar's Number

Go To

ViralLamb Since: Jun, 2010
#1: Dec 8th 2011 at 5:48:59 PM

Is it relevant to our daily lives or our current society?

Is Dunbar's number representative of how many people we can "conceive of as people instead of one dimensional characters" like a certain cracked article argued, or does it tell us how many stable and consistent relationships we can carry on socially at a time?

There seems to be a lot of confusion with what this concept actually entails, me included, so here's a link to wikipedia just because.

edited 8th Dec '11 6:04:11 PM by ViralLamb

Power corrupts. Knowledge is Power. Study hard. Be evil.
USAF713 I changed accounts. from the United States Since: Sep, 2010
I changed accounts.
#2: Dec 8th 2011 at 5:52:40 PM

Sometimes known as the "monkeysphere," yes?

Thank you Cracked. [lol]

Anyhow, yeah, I'd say it's relevant, though I'm not sure whether or not it's actually an accepted, proven idea yet, scientifically-speaking. If it is, it would be huge, and coincide with my hypothesis that humans are, at some base level, hopelessly selfish creatures...

I am now known as Flyboy.
feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#3: Dec 8th 2011 at 5:55:23 PM

I simply don't behave the way I'm supposed to behave if it works the way people say it works.

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
Erock Proud Canadian from Toronto Since: Jul, 2009
Proud Canadian
#4: Dec 8th 2011 at 5:56:11 PM

Short answer: yes!

If you don't like a single Frank Ocean song, you have no soul.
DeMarquis Since: Feb, 2010
#5: Dec 8th 2011 at 6:57:59 PM

Well, it's an average. There is a huge variation in the number of relationships that different people can manage. Most people know several dozen others on a first name basis at any one time. There are a very few people who know hundreds.

Add Post

Total posts: 5
Top