The joker doesn't react as if he's the one being adressed, which is connected to this trope in some sense, but the reaction is just wrong.

Eh, I agree that it's not exactly what the trope is, but it gets enough of the point across for me to not vote to remove it. Would like some options though.

According to the entry on the page, the Joker comments in the next panel "I see, you were adressing ME". That's closer to the trope, could that panel perhaps be added?

At that moment it actually deliberately confuses the issue. If I was skimming across pages I would take it to mean it was the joke in the comic (which is prevalent enough) whereas it's something completely different. The God complex seems to be an important part of the trope and this is the opposite of that

I agree. Maybe we can cut the second panel and put the latter one that actually shows this trope together?

But that doesn't really make sense that way then. In my opinion at least.

Yes, or we could find a better picture, if it's possible.

Bump.

Once when I was looking for Joker pics, I found a version of the current pic that had that third panel attached...I'll see if I can find it again.

Here we go.

Anyone?

Eh.

I'm okay with it.

Not really any better.

It is an improvement, I suppose.

It's still not good. It's really long and only the last panel really makes the point, and even then it's not done very well.

I'm not gonna be hurt if it doesn't get used...the more I think about it, the less I like it as an example.

Since the current isn't an example anyway, should we pull it?

Motion to pull.

Image does not illustrate the trope: the Joker acts not as if he is being addressed (which would be this trope), but as if somebody behind him is being addressed.

Seconding Pull

Thirding.

So can we pull it then?

Yanked.

Anyone have anything better, or should we leave this imageless for now?

It's fine with just a quote, I think.