Follow TV Tropes

Following

Unclear definition and a mix of examples: Character Exaggeration

Go To

Jordan Azor Ahai from Westeros Since: Jan, 2001
Azor Ahai
#1: May 13th 2011 at 7:13:46 AM

My impression is that Character Exageration has something to do with adaptations of a work in which when something goes from one medium to another, in the second medium, a character's personality is exaggerated. Maybe it doesn't mean this, but a lot of examples are to this effect.

There are also examples noting characters' personalities being exaggerated on filler episodes of anime series. I'm not sure this is a correct use of the trope, but it sounds like it could be (i.e. character x acts in a more ridiculous way in non-cannon episodes but is their normal self in the canon ones).

But then there's also examples like the Spongebob Squarepants ones (boy is that show a criticism magnet) that sound like straight up Flanderization.

So, I'm wonder which of these gets at the right meaning of the trope.

Hodor
LouieW Loser from Babycowland Since: Aug, 2009
Loser
#2: May 13th 2011 at 9:59:39 AM

I agree about the definition being unclear. I find this part of the description to be particularly confusing.

Unlike Flanderization, this version of the character appears like this initially rather than gradually evolving to it; most of the time it just happens that the 'new' version is based on the end-product of the 'old' version's long and changing development. Similarly production time often limits the amount a character can appear, the most 'important' traits are emphasized to make them distinctive.
The trope's discussion page seems to agree that the description needs some work too.

While I am not totally sure what the trope should be about, I think it is safe to say that examples that are just Flanderization can be moved to that trope.

In my opinion, character exaggeration is probably too broad of a name to just be about character exaggeration as a result of moving from one medium to another anyway. I think the name may be causing some of the problems with the examples.

edited 13th May '11 10:04:30 AM by LouieW

"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 d
Jordan Azor Ahai from Westeros Since: Jan, 2001
Azor Ahai
#3: May 13th 2011 at 10:03:13 AM

Good point. That's something else confusing in the quote. It sort of suggests that an example would involve a character being exasperated in the move from development to finished product, but I wonder how many people would know of examples unless they were the creators of that work.

Hodor
DoktorvonEurotrash Since: Jan, 2001
#4: May 14th 2011 at 2:04:34 AM

I don't see how this is different enough from Flanderization to warrant a different page.

Also, why is a misspelling of the title used as a redirect? I think we should expect for people to learn how to spell "exaggeration".

Deboss I see the Awesomeness. from Awesomeville Texas Since: Aug, 2009
I see the Awesomeness.
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#6: May 14th 2011 at 6:58:34 AM

According to my spellcheck yes there is. This is a British vs American English thing? (without my spellcheck I would of spelled it the other way.)

edited 14th May '11 7:01:08 AM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
shimaspawn from Here and Now Since: May, 2010 Relationship Status: In your bunk
#7: May 14th 2011 at 7:25:57 AM

No, this is a properly spelled vs. misspelled thing. Both countries spell it with 2 gs.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Raso Cure Candy Since: Jul, 2009
Cure Candy
#8: May 14th 2011 at 7:33:29 AM

Why in the hell do we have a misspelled redirect to the correct spelling then? (Unless this was launched misspelled and later renamed?)

Can we cutlist that redirect?

edited 14th May '11 7:34:35 AM by Raso

Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Discar Since: Jun, 2009
#9: May 14th 2011 at 8:23:42 AM

Character Exageration doesn't have any wicks, so I'd say go for it.

Worldmaker Title? What Title? Since: Jun, 2010
Title? What Title?
#10: Jun 28th 2011 at 8:55:19 AM

How is this not Flanderization?

Being in a Japanese-produced work is not enough of a difference to warrant its own trope.
storyyeller More like giant cherries from Appleloosa Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: RelationshipOutOfBoundsException: 1
More like giant cherries
#11: Sep 16th 2011 at 3:37:10 PM

Bump. This is still a big problem.

I vote for merging with Flanderization.

Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's Play
Twentington Since: Apr, 2009 Relationship Status: Desperate
#12: Sep 16th 2011 at 5:07:30 PM

[up][up]Because exaggeration has two G's.

[up]Supported.

20LogRoot10 Since: Aug, 2011
#13: Sep 16th 2011 at 5:43:18 PM

Adaptational Flanderization seems distinct enough - might have to kick it back to YKTTW to gather up enough examples.

Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - Camacan
wattage Since: Mar, 2011
#14: Sep 24th 2011 at 1:42:52 PM

[down]Vote against merging with Flanderization. This trope appears to refer to shifts in medium. For example, an Abridged Series or a Fanfiction wouldn't fall under Flanderization, or the character as written by a different author. If anything, it should be a subtrope of Alternative Character Interpretation.

edited 24th Sep '11 1:43:38 PM by wattage

Add Post

Total posts: 14
Top