I agree about the definition being unclear. I find this part of the description to be particularly confusing.
While I am not totally sure what the trope should be about, I think it is safe to say that examples that are just Flanderization can be moved to that trope.
In my opinion, character exaggeration is probably too broad of a name to just be about character exaggeration as a result of moving from one medium to another anyway. I think the name may be causing some of the problems with the examples.
edited 13th May '11 10:04:30 AM by LouieW
"irhgT nm0w tehre might b ea lotof th1nmgs i dont udarstannd, ubt oim ujst goinjg to keepfollowing this pazth i belieove iN !!!!!1 dGood point. That's something else confusing in the quote. It sort of suggests that an example would involve a character being exasperated in the move from development to finished product, but I wonder how many people would know of examples unless they were the creators of that work.
HodorI don't see how this is different enough from Flanderization to warrant a different page.
Also, why is a misspelling of the title used as a redirect? I think we should expect for people to learn how to spell "exaggeration".
There's two g's in exaggeration?
Fight smart, not fair.According to my spellcheck yes there is. This is a British vs American English thing? (without my spellcheck I would of spelled it the other way.)
edited 14th May '11 7:01:08 AM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!No, this is a properly spelled vs. misspelled thing. Both countries spell it with 2 gs.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickWhy in the hell do we have a misspelled redirect to the correct spelling then? (Unless this was launched misspelled and later renamed?)
Can we cutlist that redirect?
edited 14th May '11 7:34:35 AM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!Character Exageration doesn't have any wicks, so I'd say go for it.
How is this not Flanderization?
Being in a Japanese-produced work is not enough of a difference to warrant its own trope.Bump. This is still a big problem.
I vote for merging with Flanderization.
Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's PlayBecause exaggeration has two G's.
Supported.
Adaptational Flanderization seems distinct enough - might have to kick it back to YKTTW to gather up enough examples.
Yeah, unwritten rule number one: follow all the unwritten procedures. - CamacanVote against merging with Flanderization. This trope appears to refer to shifts in medium. For example, an Abridged Series or a Fanfiction wouldn't fall under Flanderization, or the character as written by a different author. If anything, it should be a subtrope of Alternative Character Interpretation.
edited 24th Sep '11 1:43:38 PM by wattage
My impression is that Character Exageration has something to do with adaptations of a work in which when something goes from one medium to another, in the second medium, a character's personality is exaggerated. Maybe it doesn't mean this, but a lot of examples are to this effect.
There are also examples noting characters' personalities being exaggerated on filler episodes of anime series. I'm not sure this is a correct use of the trope, but it sounds like it could be (i.e. character x acts in a more ridiculous way in non-cannon episodes but is their normal self in the canon ones).
But then there's also examples like the Spongebob Squarepants ones (boy is that show a criticism magnet) that sound like straight up Flanderization.
So, I'm wonder which of these gets at the right meaning of the trope.
Hodor