Bioshock Infinite

I don't really care, it's still a pretty boring choice. I mean, Levine has been all about the INFINITE POSSIBILITIES, revisiting the setting from the first two games doesn't strike me as particularly bold.

edited 30th Jul '13 2:10:25 PM by Firestorm

what a great comeback

Didn't they have pre-Fall Rapture in the multiplayer for Bioshock 2?

While I would have liked to see a new adventure set in Columbia, don't forget that there's going to be another DLC story after this one. Frankly, I'm fine with either one. They'd both be awesome places to live in if they weren't crapsack worlds.

edited 30th Jul '13 2:26:19 PM by Mort08

Yeah, and it was a selling point there, so it's not like it hasn't been done before, though to be fair 2's multiplayer wasn't that popular.

Also are you referring to the third DLC story? Cause if so, that's just going to be part 2 of the Rapture one.

edited 30th Jul '13 2:25:50 PM by Firestorm

Not so much "pre" as "during" I'd think.

...I guess this doesn't highlight the "infinite" possibilities so much, but it isn't that boring or lame. Getting to see actual people in Rapture is nice enough.

I mean, I'm sure it'll be decent at least, I'm just disappointed, I know a lot of it is bitterness on my end for what could of been, but there's so many aspects of Infinite you could of explored, WHAT IF BOOKER AND ELIZABETH WERE IN RAPTURE AGAIN AND IT WAS NOIR just feels too safe.

Keep in mind that we still don't even know what the other DLC is going to be like.

Uh, yes, we do, it's going to be part 2 of the Rapture one. I'm okay with that, and I don't see why Firestorm is being so negative, aside from trying to live up to her username.

edited 30th Jul '13 2:32:43 PM by DAStudent

I mean BESIDES FUCKING RAPTURE. A Season Pass usually consists of more than 2 DLC items.

Yeah, it consists of three DLC items. The third DLC item is part 2 of the Rapture DLC.

I don't see why you're all so disappointed; this looks really fun and interesting to me!

edited 30th Jul '13 2:34:28 PM by DAStudent

The other item we're getting aside from the two parter is Clash in the Clouds, which is a horde mode, exciting stuff I know. It's out today.

To be fair I had a total meltdown last time I visited this thread, so I already have a bad reputation. I'm just bitter that I spent 20$ for a horde mode and yet another fucking Rapture story.

edited 30th Jul '13 2:36:31 PM by Firestorm

Where is the news of the other DLC packs coming from, anyway? I don't see anything aside from the trailer for #1.

Firestorm, please vacate the thread if all you're going to do is be bitter and unpleasant.

Any thoughts on my speculation on the last page?

Two-part outing. Yeah.

So the combat one is out today. The first episode of Burial At Sea will be out later. The Second episode will be out after that.

With the combat one that makes three total.

Which is the number they said they were going to release.

Considering that we know absolutely nothing about Burial At Sea other than the premise, I suggest we be willing to give it a chance.

Not many people are uninterested in Burial At Sea; 99+% of the people I've seen react to it have been extremely positive.

Clash in the clouds is $5. Season pass is $20.

Either there's more they haven't announced, or both parts of Burial At Sea will be about $7.50 each, which is really high for dlc.

Or the Season Pass is actually more expensive than the stuff in it.

Each part of Burial At Sea is $15, so the Season Pass is actually a good deal even if you're uninterested in Clash In The Clouds.

Edit: Oh never mind!

edited 30th Jul '13 2:45:59 PM by Firestorm

...Each part individually?

How do you know that anyway?

Just heard it around; been following the news on all of this pretty closely today.

...Could you source some of it maybe?

But that would require me to look back through everything I've looked at today, which isn't worth it to me. Don't call me a liar just because I don't see the value in rereading all of the tons of articles about this I've read today.

Well then maybe don't declare something as fact if you're not willing to back it up.