Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / RosencrantzAndGuildensternAreDead

Go To

OR

Added: 504

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: The player is Shakespeare.]]

to:

[[WMG: The player Player is Shakespeare.]]



* Finally, he is very genre-savvy, knowing the Guildenstern's sword was fake, a theater prop.

to:

* Finally, he is very genre-savvy, knowing the Guildenstern's sword was fake, a theater prop.prop.

[[WMG: The Player spends time with different cast members during each reset.]]
This is why he is not only so genre savvy, but also so knowledgeable about events before they happen.
* In one reset, he spends time with Polonius, which explains how he knows that "the old man thinks [Hamlet] is in love with his daughter".
* In at least one reset, he saw the fencing match between Hamlet and Laertes, which his Tragedians perform but could not have witnessed if they'd spent every reset with R & G.
* And so on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** That's very much TheThemeParkVersion of Shakespeare. Shakespeare's plays which are not BasedOnATrueStory usually have an EverybodyLives ending, but the ones where TheHeroDies are vastly more famous because TrueArtIsAngsty.

to:

** That's very much TheThemeParkVersion of Shakespeare. Shakespeare's non-BasedOnATrueStory plays which are not BasedOnATrueStory usually have an EverybodyLives ending, but the ones where TheHeroDies are vastly more famous because TrueArtIsAngsty.

Added: 225

Changed: 27

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** That's very much TheThemeParkVersion of Shakespeare. Shakespeare's plays which are not BasedOnATrueStory usually have an EverybodyLives ending, but the ones where TheHeroDies are vastly more famous because TrueArtIsAngsty.



* Finally, he is very genre-savvy, knowing the Guildenstern's (or was it Rosencrantz's?) sword was fake, a theater prop.

to:

* Finally, he is very genre-savvy, knowing the Guildenstern's (or was it Rosencrantz's?) sword was fake, a theater prop.

Added: 837

Changed: 805

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This is highly believable, because 1) he is the leader of a theater troupe that can do all kinds of play (as long as there is blood), much like Shakespeare and his plays. Polonius also mentions (in the original play) that he played the title role in "Julius Caesar", another Shakespeare play, making Shakespeare canonical in this world. Finally, the most important fact is that he and his troupe know how "Hamlet" ends, unlike most other characters.
He also talks about how all the world's a stage, which is a reference to Shakespeare's play "As You Like It" (the exact quote being "The whole world's a stage, and all men and women merely players". He understands that this is a play, and so makes no matter of anything, including his own faked death. He is also very genre-savvy, knowing the Guildenstern's (or was it Rosencrantz's?) sword was fake, a theater prop.

to:

This is highly believable, because 1) he because:
* He
is the leader of a theater troupe that troupe.
* His plays
can do all kinds of play (as long as have rhetoric, love, or blood. The love and rhetoric may or may not be in there, but there is blood), much like MUST be blood (and someone dies in just about every Shakespeare and his plays. play).
*
Polonius also mentions (in the original play) that he played the title role in "Julius Caesar", another Shakespeare play, making Shakespeare canonical in this world. Finally, the most important fact is that he world.
* He
and his troupe know how "Hamlet" ends, unlike most other characters.
* He also talks about how all the world's a stage, which is a reference to Shakespeare's play "As You Like It" (the exact quote being "The whole world's a stage, and all men and women merely players". players").
*
He understands that this is a play, and so makes no matter of anything, including his own faked death. He death.
* Finally, he
is also very genre-savvy, knowing the Guildenstern's (or was it Rosencrantz's?) sword was fake, a theater prop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** No, that's the worst part. They win, resulting in Hamlet starting over once again.

to:

** No, that's the worst part. They win, resulting in Hamlet starting over once again.again.

[[WMG: The player is Shakespeare.]]
This is highly believable, because 1) he is the leader of a theater troupe that can do all kinds of play (as long as there is blood), much like Shakespeare and his plays. Polonius also mentions (in the original play) that he played the title role in "Julius Caesar", another Shakespeare play, making Shakespeare canonical in this world. Finally, the most important fact is that he and his troupe know how "Hamlet" ends, unlike most other characters.
He also talks about how all the world's a stage, which is a reference to Shakespeare's play "As You Like It" (the exact quote being "The whole world's a stage, and all men and women merely players". He understands that this is a play, and so makes no matter of anything, including his own faked death. He is also very genre-savvy, knowing the Guildenstern's (or was it Rosencrantz's?) sword was fake, a theater prop.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: The Player is a DarkMessiah for a belief that the world is a stage.]]
And he is proved right.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The real problem is that the coin toss goes whatever way would be convenient either to advance the plot or set up a gag, and Guildenstern noticing this is a symptom of being overtly aware of his surroundings. Now, we know for a fact that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern die, and the text overtly implies that each time this happens ''Hamlet'' merely begins again. Therefore, even assuming they got close to an afterlife in their brief time in-between the peal of ordnance getting shot off and Bernardo entering, the coin toss is going to fail.

to:

* The real problem is that the coin toss goes whatever way would be convenient either to advance the plot or set up a gag, and Guildenstern noticing this is a symptom of being overtly aware of his surroundings. Now, we know for a fact that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern die, and the text overtly implies that each time this happens ''Hamlet'' merely begins again. Therefore, even assuming they got close to an afterlife in their brief time in-between the peal of ordnance getting shot off and Bernardo entering, the coin toss is going to fail.fail.
** No, that's the worst part. They win, resulting in Hamlet starting over once again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* But didn't the coin eventually start turning tails repeatedly towards the end of the play?

to:

* But didn't the coin eventually start turning tails repeatedly towards the end of the play?play?
* The real problem is that the coin toss goes whatever way would be convenient either to advance the plot or set up a gag, and Guildenstern noticing this is a symptom of being overtly aware of his surroundings. Now, we know for a fact that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern die, and the text overtly implies that each time this happens ''Hamlet'' merely begins again. Therefore, even assuming they got close to an afterlife in their brief time in-between the peal of ordnance getting shot off and Bernardo entering, the coin toss is going to fail.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Just wanted to point out a new line of reasoning/ask a question. Feel free to edit or respond to it.


* The problem is that Death always calls for heads.

to:

* The problem is that Death always calls for heads.heads.
* But didn't the coin eventually start turning tails repeatedly towards the end of the play?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
joke making


* Hehe, FridgeBrilliance.

to:

* Hehe, FridgeBrilliance.FridgeBrilliance.
* The problem is that Death always calls for heads.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


They met Death and [[ChessWithDeath challenged him to a coin toss.]]

to:

They met Death and [[ChessWithDeath challenged him to a coin toss.]]]]
* Hehe, FridgeBrilliance.

Top