Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Trivia / RedDragon

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TechnologyMarchesOn: Dolarhyde chooses his victims through their home movies, which are shot on film and are sent to his company for processing. While it made sense in 1981 (when the book was published) and 1979 (when the book was set), when 8mm and 16mm cameras were still commonly used for home movies, this plot device quickly became outdated by 1983 when the camcorder became a reality, thanks to the fact that videotape doesn't need any post-processing and can be played back as soon as a recording is finished. While 1986's ''Manhunter'' retains the book's use of film-based home movies despite its contemporary setting, the 2002 adaptation updates the story to Dolarhyde's company compositing shorter home movies into VHS tapes (as the timeframe set by ''The Silence of the Lambs'' meant the movie had to take place in the mid-80s instead of 1979). Of course, that too is wildly outdated today, with the rise of digital cameras, smartphones, and video-editing software like [=iMovie=] and Windows Movie Maker all rendering this practice obsolete. Today, Dolarhyde would likely stalk victims on social media sites like [=YouTube=], Twitter, Instagram, or [=TikTok=].

to:

* TechnologyMarchesOn: Dolarhyde chooses his victims through their home movies, which are shot on film and are sent to his company for processing. While it made sense in 1981 (when the book was published) and 1979 (when the book was set), when 8mm and 16mm cameras were still commonly used for home movies, this plot device quickly became outdated by 1983 when the camcorder became a reality, thanks to the fact that videotape doesn't need any post-processing and can be played back as soon as a recording is finished. While 1986's ''Manhunter'' retains the book's use of film-based home movies despite its contemporary setting, the 2002 adaptation updates the story to Dolarhyde's company compositing shorter home movies into VHS tapes (as the timeframe set by ''The Silence of the Lambs'' meant the movie had to take place in the mid-80s instead of 1979). Of course, that too is wildly outdated today, with the rise of digital cameras, smartphones, and video-editing software like [=iMovie=] and Windows Movie Maker all rendering this practice obsolete. Today, Dolarhyde would likely stalk victims on social media sites like [=YouTube=], Twitter, Instagram, or [=TikTok=].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CaliforniaDoubling: Although the "Red Dragon" painting is housed at the Brooklyn Museum, the building we see in the film is the Baltimore Museum Of Art.

Added: 180

Changed: 53

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheOtherDarrin: Harvey Keitel replaced Scott Glenn as Jack Crawford.

to:

* TheOtherDarrin: Harvey Keitel TheOtherDarrin:
** Creator/HarveyKeitel
replaced Scott Glenn Creator/ScottGlenn as Jack Crawford. Crawford.
** The same with the French dub of Crawford, with Creator/BernardPierreDonnadieu replacing Creator/PierreHatet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Music/MichaelJackson of all people lobbied to play Dolarhyde! Considering Jackson's own lifelong self-image issues and alleged eccentricities, there ''is'' an admitted parallel, but it's still somewhat jarring to think about. Creator/PaulBettany was also offered the role, but he wasn't busy with ''Film/{{Dogville}}''. Creator/NicolasCage and Creator/SeanPenn were also considered, while Creator/JeremyPiven auditioned.

to:

** Music/MichaelJackson of all people lobbied to play Dolarhyde! Considering Jackson's own lifelong self-image issues and alleged eccentricities, there ''is'' an admitted parallel, but it's still somewhat jarring to think about. Creator/PaulBettany was also offered the role, but he wasn't was busy with ''Film/{{Dogville}}''. Creator/NicolasCage and Creator/SeanPenn were also considered, while Creator/JeremyPiven auditioned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving to YMMV


* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The plot hinges on Dolarhyde's employment at a film processing facility. He discovers his victims via the home movies they send in for processing and uses the home movies to learn the layouts of the home and any obstacles in his way. His job quickly became obsolete with the rise of camcorders just a few years later, and nowadays the ubiquity of smartphones and video editing software makes his job next-to-nonfunctional. The 2002 film adaptation pushed him slightly ahead of his literary counterpart: in the book he processes film for use in projectors, while in the movie he edits multiple home videotapes onto one tape. Of note is that the original book was set in 1979, while both film adaptations shoot for a mid-80's setting (which was contemporary for ''Manhunter'', but in the 2002 film's case is done to preserve continuity with ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs''; the latter case is an AvertedTrope though, given that the 2002 film is an ''intentional'' period piece).

Added: 158

Removed: 679

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AnachronismStew: When Graham is investigating the Leeds' entertainment cabinet, a VHS copy of ''Film/MrsDoubtfire'' can be seen, a film released in 1993. The prologue for this film takes place in 1980, with the bulk of the story occurring "several years later" (with ''Manhunter'' before it establishing a three-year gap and the original novel a four-year one). It's doubtful 12 years were meant to have passed, especially since this story occurs before ''Film/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'', which took place around 1990.



* CastTheRunnerUp: According to the DVDCommentary, Creator/PhilipSeymourHoffman very much wanted to play Dolarhyde; he ended up being cast as Lounds instead.



** According to the commentary track for the 2002 film, Creator/PhilipSeymourHoffman very much wanted to play Dolarhyde; he ended up being cast as Lounds instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The plot hinges on Dolarhyde's employment at a film processing facility. He discovers his victims via the home movies they send in for processing and uses the home movies to learn the layouts of the home and any obstacles in his way. His job quickly became obsolete with the rise of camcorders just a few years later, and nowadays the ubiquity of smartphones and video editing software makes his job next-to-nonfunctional. The 2002 film adaptation pushed him slightly ahead of his literary counterpart: in the book he processes film for use in projectors, while in the movie he edits multiple home videotapes onto one tape. Of note is that the original book was set in 1979, while both film adaptations shoot for a mid-80's setting (which was contemporary for ''Manhunter'', but in the 2002 film's case is done to preserve continuity with ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'').

to:

* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The plot hinges on Dolarhyde's employment at a film processing facility. He discovers his victims via the home movies they send in for processing and uses the home movies to learn the layouts of the home and any obstacles in his way. His job quickly became obsolete with the rise of camcorders just a few years later, and nowadays the ubiquity of smartphones and video editing software makes his job next-to-nonfunctional. The 2002 film adaptation pushed him slightly ahead of his literary counterpart: in the book he processes film for use in projectors, while in the movie he edits multiple home videotapes onto one tape. Of note is that the original book was set in 1979, while both film adaptations shoot for a mid-80's setting (which was contemporary for ''Manhunter'', but in the 2002 film's case is done to preserve continuity with ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'').''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs''; the latter case is an AvertedTrope though, given that the 2002 film is an ''intentional'' period piece).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TechnologyMarchesOn: Dolarhyde chooses his victims through their home movies, which are shot on film and are sent to his company for processing. While it made sense in 1981 (when the book was published) and 1979 (when the book was set), when 8mm and 16mm cameras were still commonly used for home movies, this plot device quickly became outdated by the mid-80s when the camcorder became a reality, thanks to the fact that videotape doesn't need any post-processing and can be played back as soon as a recording is finished. While 1986's ''Manhunter'' retains the book's use of film-based home movies despite its contemporary setting, the 2002 adaptation updates the story to Dolarhyde's company compositing shorter home movies into VHS tapes (as the timeframe set by ''The Silence of the Lambs'' meant the movie had to take place in the mid-80s instead of 1979). Of course, that too is wildly outdated today, with the rise of digital cameras, smartphones, and video-editing software like [=iMovie=] and Windows Movie Maker all rendering this practice obsolete. Today, Dolarhyde would likely stalk victims on social media sites like [=YouTube=], Twitter, Instagram, or [=TikTok=].

to:

* TechnologyMarchesOn: Dolarhyde chooses his victims through their home movies, which are shot on film and are sent to his company for processing. While it made sense in 1981 (when the book was published) and 1979 (when the book was set), when 8mm and 16mm cameras were still commonly used for home movies, this plot device quickly became outdated by the mid-80s 1983 when the camcorder became a reality, thanks to the fact that videotape doesn't need any post-processing and can be played back as soon as a recording is finished. While 1986's ''Manhunter'' retains the book's use of film-based home movies despite its contemporary setting, the 2002 adaptation updates the story to Dolarhyde's company compositing shorter home movies into VHS tapes (as the timeframe set by ''The Silence of the Lambs'' meant the movie had to take place in the mid-80s instead of 1979). Of course, that too is wildly outdated today, with the rise of digital cameras, smartphones, and video-editing software like [=iMovie=] and Windows Movie Maker all rendering this practice obsolete. Today, Dolarhyde would likely stalk victims on social media sites like [=YouTube=], Twitter, Instagram, or [=TikTok=].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AnachronismStew: When Graham is investigating the Leeds' entertainment cabinet, a VHS copy of ''Film/MrsDoubtfire'' can be seen, a film released in 1993. The prologue for this film takes place in 1980, with the bulk of the story occurring "several years later." It's doubtful 12 years were meant to have passed, especially since this story occurs before ''Film/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'', which took place around 1990.

to:

* AnachronismStew: When Graham is investigating the Leeds' entertainment cabinet, a VHS copy of ''Film/MrsDoubtfire'' can be seen, a film released in 1993. The prologue for this film takes place in 1980, with the bulk of the story occurring "several years later." later" (with ''Manhunter'' before it establishing a three-year gap and the original novel a four-year one). It's doubtful 12 years were meant to have passed, especially since this story occurs before ''Film/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'', which took place around 1990.



* DyeingForYourArt: Creator/RalphFiennes gained fifteen pounds of muscle.

to:

* DyeingForYourArt: Creator/RalphFiennes gained fifteen pounds of muscle.muscle while preparing to portray the similarly bulked-up Dolarhyde.



* TechnologyMarchesOn: Dolarhyde chooses his victims through their home movies, which are shot on film and are sent to his company for processing. This plot device was outdated by the mid-80s when the camcorder became a reality. The 2002 adaptation updates the story to Dolarhyde's company compositing shorter home movies into VHS tapes (as the timeframe set by ''The Silence of the Lambs'' meant the movie had to take place in the mid-80s instead of the late 70s). Of course, that too is wildly outdated. Today, Dolarhyde would likely stalk victims on Youtube.
** In the television version, made and set in the 2010's, it's made a plot point that film development is a more specialized field now thanks to digital, and Dolarhyde is one of the few left who knows how to do it.
* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The plot hinges on Dolarhyde's employment at a film processing facility. He discovers his victims via the home movies they send in for processing and uses the home movies to learn the layouts of the home and any obstacles in his way. Nowadays his job is obsolete. The movie ''Red Dragon'' pushed him slightly ahead of his literary counterpart. In the book he processes film for use in projectors, in the movie he edits multiple home videotapes onto one tape.

to:

* TechnologyMarchesOn: Dolarhyde chooses his victims through their home movies, which are shot on film and are sent to his company for processing. This While it made sense in 1981 (when the book was published) and 1979 (when the book was set), when 8mm and 16mm cameras were still commonly used for home movies, this plot device was quickly became outdated by the mid-80s when the camcorder became a reality. The reality, thanks to the fact that videotape doesn't need any post-processing and can be played back as soon as a recording is finished. While 1986's ''Manhunter'' retains the book's use of film-based home movies despite its contemporary setting, the 2002 adaptation updates the story to Dolarhyde's company compositing shorter home movies into VHS tapes (as the timeframe set by ''The Silence of the Lambs'' meant the movie had to take place in the mid-80s instead of the late 70s). 1979). Of course, that too is wildly outdated. outdated today, with the rise of digital cameras, smartphones, and video-editing software like [=iMovie=] and Windows Movie Maker all rendering this practice obsolete. Today, Dolarhyde would likely stalk victims on Youtube.
social media sites like [=YouTube=], Twitter, Instagram, or [=TikTok=].
** In [[Series/{{Hannibal}} the television version, TV version]], made and set in the 2010's, it's made a plot point that film development is a more specialized field now thanks to digital, the ubiquity of digital video technology, and Dolarhyde is one of the few left who knows how to do it.
* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The plot hinges on Dolarhyde's employment at a film processing facility. He discovers his victims via the home movies they send in for processing and uses the home movies to learn the layouts of the home and any obstacles in his way. Nowadays His job quickly became obsolete with the rise of camcorders just a few years later, and nowadays the ubiquity of smartphones and video editing software makes his job is obsolete. next-to-nonfunctional. The movie ''Red Dragon'' 2002 film adaptation pushed him slightly ahead of his literary counterpart. In counterpart: in the book he processes film for use in projectors, while in the movie he edits multiple home videotapes onto one tape.tape. Of note is that the original book was set in 1979, while both film adaptations shoot for a mid-80's setting (which was contemporary for ''Manhunter'', but in the 2002 film's case is done to preserve continuity with ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'').



** According to the Red Dragon commentary, Creator/PhilipSeymourHoffman very much wanted to play Dolarhyde.

to:

** According to the Red Dragon commentary, commentary track for the 2002 film, Creator/PhilipSeymourHoffman very much wanted to play Dolarhyde.Dolarhyde; he ended up being cast as Lounds instead.



** Music/MichaelJackson lobbied to play Dolarhyde (!). Creator/PaulBettany. was offered the role, but he wasn't busy with ''Film/{{Dogville}}''. Creator/NicolasCage and Creator/SeanPenn were also considered, while Creator/JeremyPiven auditioned.

to:

** Music/MichaelJackson of all people lobbied to play Dolarhyde (!). Creator/PaulBettany. Dolarhyde! Considering Jackson's own lifelong self-image issues and alleged eccentricities, there ''is'' an admitted parallel, but it's still somewhat jarring to think about. Creator/PaulBettany was also offered the role, but he wasn't busy with ''Film/{{Dogville}}''. Creator/NicolasCage and Creator/SeanPenn were also considered, while Creator/JeremyPiven auditioned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Creator/DarioArgento, who was a big fan of the original novel and disliked the [[Film/{{Manhunter}} Michael Mann adaptation]], expressed interest in directing his own adaptation, but nothing ever came of it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Music/MichaelJackson lobbied to play Dolarhyde (!). Creator/PaulBettany. was offered the role, but he wasn't busy with ''Film/{{Dogville}}''. Creator/NicolasCage and Creator/SeanPenn were also considered.
** Creator/JackBlack was considered for Freddy Lounds. Had Creator/AnthonyHeald not been available, the role of Chilton would have gone to Creator/TimRoth.

to:

** Music/MichaelJackson lobbied to play Dolarhyde (!). Creator/PaulBettany. was offered the role, but he wasn't busy with ''Film/{{Dogville}}''. Creator/NicolasCage and Creator/SeanPenn were also considered.
considered, while Creator/JeremyPiven auditioned.
** Creator/JackBlack was considered for Freddy Lounds. Had Creator/AnthonyHeald not been available, the role of Chilton would have gone to Creator/TimRoth.Creator/TimRoth.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EnforcedMethodActing: Creator/PhilipSeymourHoffman was glued to the chair for real, at his own request.

to:

* EnforcedMethodActing: Creator/PhilipSeymourHoffman was actually glued to the chair for real, wheelchair, at his own request.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheOtherDarrin: Everyone at some point.

to:

* TheOtherDarrin: Everyone at some point.Harvey Keitel replaced Scott Glenn as Jack Crawford.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomeDearBoy: As reported [[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/movies/2002-10-03-red-dragon-cover_x.htm here]], actors Creator/AnthonyHopkins, Creator/EdwardNorton, Creator/RalphFiennes, and Creator/EmilyWatson, and even Director Creator/BrettRatner have all said that they were very reluctant to do ''Red Dragon'', mostly due to how poorly ''Film/{{Hannibal}}'' had gone. What actually convinced them all to do it was the screenplay written by Ted Tally (the same screenplay writer from ''Film/SilenceOfTheLambs''), which they all thought was amazing.

to:

* AwesomeDearBoy: As reported [[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/movies/2002-10-03-red-dragon-cover_x.htm here]], actors Creator/AnthonyHopkins, Creator/EdwardNorton, Creator/RalphFiennes, and Creator/EmilyWatson, and even Director Creator/BrettRatner have all said that they were very reluctant to do ''Red Dragon'', mostly due to how poorly the mixed reception ''Film/{{Hannibal}}'' had gone. received. What actually convinced them all to do it was the screenplay written by Ted Tally (the same screenplay writer from (who had previously adapated ''Film/SilenceOfTheLambs''), which they all thought was amazing.



* TechnologyMarchesOn: Dolarhyde chooses his victims through their home movies, which are shot on film and are sent to his company for processing. This plot device was outdated by the mid-80s when the camcorder became a reality. The 2002 adaptation updates the story to Dolarhyde's company compositing shorter home movies into VHS tapes (as the timeframe set by ''Silence of the Lambs'' meant the movie had to take place in the mid-80s instead of the late 70s). Of course, that too is wildly outdated. Today Dolarhyde would just stalk victims on Youtube.

to:

* TechnologyMarchesOn: Dolarhyde chooses his victims through their home movies, which are shot on film and are sent to his company for processing. This plot device was outdated by the mid-80s when the camcorder became a reality. The 2002 adaptation updates the story to Dolarhyde's company compositing shorter home movies into VHS tapes (as the timeframe set by ''Silence ''The Silence of the Lambs'' meant the movie had to take place in the mid-80s instead of the late 70s). Of course, that too is wildly outdated. Today Today, Dolarhyde would just likely stalk victims on Youtube.



* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The plot hinges on Dolarhyde's employment at a film processing facility. He discovers his victims via the home movies they send in for processing and uses the home movies to learn the layouts of the home and any obstacles in his way. Nowadays his job is obsolete. The movie ''Red Dragon'' pushed him slightly ahead of his literary counterpart. In the book he processes film for use in projectors, in the movie he processes film into videotapes.

to:

* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The plot hinges on Dolarhyde's employment at a film processing facility. He discovers his victims via the home movies they send in for processing and uses the home movies to learn the layouts of the home and any obstacles in his way. Nowadays his job is obsolete. The movie ''Red Dragon'' pushed him slightly ahead of his literary counterpart. In the book he processes film for use in projectors, in the movie he processes film into videotapes.edits multiple home videotapes onto one tape.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added "Anachronism Stew"

Added DiffLines:

* AnachronismStew: When Graham is investigating the Leeds' entertainment cabinet, a VHS copy of ''Film/MrsDoubtfire'' can be seen, a film released in 1993. The prologue for this film takes place in 1980, with the bulk of the story occurring "several years later." It's doubtful 12 years were meant to have passed, especially since this story occurs before ''Film/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'', which took place around 1990.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Creator/JackBlack was considered for Freddy Lounds. Had Anthony Heald not been available, the role of Chilton would have gone to Creator/TimRoth.

to:

** Creator/JackBlack was considered for Freddy Lounds. Had Anthony Heald Creator/AnthonyHeald not been available, the role of Chilton would have gone to Creator/TimRoth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the television version, made and set in the 2010s, Francis has the option to go digital but prefers film.

to:

** In the television version, made and set in the 2010s, Francis has 2010's, it's made a plot point that film development is a more specialized field now thanks to digital, and Dolarhyde is one of the option few left who knows how to go digital but prefers film.do it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomeDearBoy: Actors Creator/AnthonyHopkins, Creator/EdwardNorton, Creator/RalphFiennes, and Creator/EmilyWatson, and even Director Creator/BrettRatner have all said that they were very reluctant to do ''Red Dragon'', mostly due to how poorly ''Film/{{Hannibal}}'' had gone. What actually convinced them all to do it was the screenplay written by Ted Tally (the same screenplay writer from ''Film/SilenceOfTheLambs''), which they all thought was amazing.

to:

* AwesomeDearBoy: Actors As reported [[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/movies/2002-10-03-red-dragon-cover_x.htm here]], actors Creator/AnthonyHopkins, Creator/EdwardNorton, Creator/RalphFiennes, and Creator/EmilyWatson, and even Director Creator/BrettRatner have all said that they were very reluctant to do ''Red Dragon'', mostly due to how poorly ''Film/{{Hannibal}}'' had gone. What actually convinced them all to do it was the screenplay written by Ted Tally (the same screenplay writer from ''Film/SilenceOfTheLambs''), which they all thought was amazing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AwesomeDearBoy: Actors Creator/AnthonyHopkins, Creator/EdwardNorton, Creator/RalphFiennes, and Creator/EmilyWatson, and even Director Creator/BrettRatner have all said that they were very reluctant to do ''Red Dragon'', mostly due to how poorly ''Film/{{Hannibal}}'' had gone. What actually convinced them all to do it was the screenplay written by Ted Tally (the same screenplay writer from ''Film/SilenceOfTheLambs''), which they all thought was amazing.

Top