Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
In reality at least some of those names, like Juan de Rojas and Juan Cortés, belong to Christianized Mayan aristocracy, not to Spaniards.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* TearJerker: The ending. Also, though subtle and unintentional is the list of kings provided in part 4. If you look closely you realize that, near the end of the line the Indian names give way to Spaniard names, showcasing how Indians tried to see the conquerors as the successors of the lineage.
to:
* TearJerker: The ending. Also, though subtle and unintentional is the list of kings provided in part 4. If you look closely you realize that, near the end of the line the Indian names give way to Spaniard names, showcasing how Indians tried to see the conquerors as Christianization and the successors of the lineage.DeathOfTheOldGods.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* TearJerker: the ending. Also, though subtle and unintentional is the list of kings provided in part 4. If you look closely you realize that, near the end of the line the Indian names give way to Spaniard names, showcasing how Indians tried to see the conquerors as the successors of the lineage.
to:
* TearJerker: the The ending. Also, though subtle and unintentional is the list of kings provided in part 4. If you look closely you realize that, near the end of the line the Indian names give way to Spaniard names, showcasing how Indians tried to see the conquerors as the successors of the lineage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TearJerker: the ending. Also, though subtle and unintentional is the list of kings provided in part 4. If you look closely you realize that, near the end of the line the Indian names give way to Spaniard names, showcasing how Indians tried to see the conquerors as the successors of the lineage.
