Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / BleakHouse

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dickens arguably has other novels that have an equally passionate fanbase, and in any case, few people will consider any of his novels free from flaws, since everyone has parts of his sprawling novels they don't like as much as others.


* SacredCow: The novel is regarded as the best of Dickens' writing, and as such is highly defended when faced with criticism
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: This novel's first paragraph is notable for containing ''the very first'' mention of a dinosaur in modern fiction, where the omniscient narrator describes the streets of London as being so muddy he could imagine a ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursSaurischianDinosaurs Megalosaurus]]'' lumbering up them just as it did in its time. It doesn't affect the story in any way, and was probably just mentioned because dinosaurs were a popular subject in Victorian Britain when Dickens wrote it.

to:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: This novel's first paragraph is notable for containing ''the very first'' mention of a dinosaur in modern fiction, where the omniscient narrator describes the streets of London as being so muddy he could imagine a ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursSaurischianDinosaurs Megalosaurus]]'' lumbering up them just as it did in its time. It doesn't affect the story in any way, and was probably just mentioned because dinosaurs were a popular subject in Victorian Britain when Dickens wrote it.that passage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: This novel's first paragraph is notable for containing ''the very first'' mention of a dinosaur in modern fiction, where the omniscient narrator describes the streets of London as being so muddy he could imagine a ''Megalosaurus'' lumbering up them. It doesn't affect the story in any way, and was probably just in because dinosaurs were in at the time.

to:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: This novel's first paragraph is notable for containing ''the very first'' mention of a dinosaur in modern fiction, where the omniscient narrator describes the streets of London as being so muddy he could imagine a ''Megalosaurus'' ''[[UsefulNotes/StockDinosaursSaurischianDinosaurs Megalosaurus]]'' lumbering up them. them just as it did in its time. It doesn't affect the story in any way, and was probably just in mentioned because dinosaurs were a popular subject in at the time.Victorian Britain when Dickens wrote it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SacredCow: The novel is regarded as the best of Dickens' writing, and as such is highly defended when faced with criticism
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: This novel is notable for containing ''the very first'' mention of a dinosaur in modern fiction (in the first paragraph, no less), where the omniscient narrator describes the streets of London as being so muddy he could imagine a ''Megalosaurus'' lumbering up them. It doesn't affect the story in any way, and was probably just in because dinosaurs were in at the time.

to:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: This novel novel's first paragraph is notable for containing ''the very first'' mention of a dinosaur in modern fiction (in the first paragraph, no less), fiction, where the omniscient narrator describes the streets of London as being so muddy he could imagine a ''Megalosaurus'' lumbering up them. It doesn't affect the story in any way, and was probably just in because dinosaurs were in at the time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Names The Same is no longer a trope


** Mr. Bucket offhandedly mentions a man named [[NamesTheSame Michael Jackson]] late in the novel.

to:

** Mr. Bucket offhandedly mentions a man named [[NamesTheSame Michael Jackson]] Jackson late in the novel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: This novel is notable for containing ''the very first'' mention of a dinosaur in modern fiction (in the first paragraph, no less), where the omniscient narrator describes the streets of London as being so muddy he could imagine a ''Megalosaurus'' lumbering up them. It doesn't affect the story in any way, and was probably just in because dinosaurs were in at the time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Gillian Anderson (Lady Dedlock) went on to play Miss Haversham in ''Literature/GreatExpectations'' (2011).

to:

** Gillian Anderson (Lady Dedlock) went on to play Miss Haversham Havisham in ''Literature/GreatExpectations'' (2011).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Charles Dance and Gillian Anderson both appeared in ''Series/TheCrown2016'', as Louis Mountbatten and Margaret Thatcher.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Gillian Anderson (Lady Dedlock) went on to play Miss Haversham in ''Literature/GreatExpectations'' (2011).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Another ''Literature/NicholasNickleby''-related example: Donald Sumpter (Brooker in 2001) played Nemo in the 1985 version of ''Bleak House''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** From the more obscure 1985 miniseres: Peter Vaughan played the villainous Mr. Tulkinghorn. Thirteen years later he played the kindly Mr. Boffin in ''Literature/OurMutualFriend''.

to:

** From the more obscure 1985 miniseres: miniseries: Peter Vaughan played the villainous Mr. Tulkinghorn. Thirteen years later he played the kindly Mr. Boffin in ''Literature/OurMutualFriend''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** From the more obscure 1985 miniseres: Peter Vaughan played the villainous Mr. Tulkinghorn. Thirteen years later he played the kindly Mr. Boffin in ''Literature/OurMutualFriend''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Charles Dance (Tulkinghorn) and Phil Davis (Smallweed) had previously played in two different versions of ''Literature/NicholasNickleby''. Dance was Ralph in the 2001 miniseries, and Davis was Brooker in the 2002 film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A criticism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dickens' meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A criticism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dickens' Dickens meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light.

Added: 323

Changed: 96

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: Mr. Bucket offhandedly mentions a man named [[NamesTheSame Michael Jackson]] late in the novel.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight:
**
Mr. Bucket offhandedly mentions a man named [[NamesTheSame Michael Jackson]] late in the novel.novel.
** The 2005 series has Anna Maxwell Martin as Esther, Charles Dance as Tulkinghorn, and Burn Gorman as Guppy. Ten years later all three would appear in ''Series/AndThenThereWereNone2015'', as Mrs. Rogers, Wargrave, and Blore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A criticism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dickens' meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A criticism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dickens' meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: Mr. Bucket offhandedly mentions a man named [[NamesTheSame Michael Jackson]] late in the novel.

Added: 198

Changed: 211

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Fridge Brilliance}}: Allan Woodcourt is Welsh. In that time and place, this would have made him a member of a persecuted minority. Who better to ignore prejudice and see Esther for who she really is?

to:

** Did Nemo commit suicide or was his death an accident?
* {{Fridge Brilliance}}: FridgeBrilliance: Allan Woodcourt is Welsh. In that time and place, this would have made him a member of a persecuted minority. Who better to ignore prejudice and see Esther for who she really is?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A critisism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dicken's meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light.
** The BBC adaptation made no bones about overhauling Esther, keeping her charitable and kind nature, but granting her a sense of humour and a sensible, rather than pathologically self-effacing, attitude to her own virtues and vices.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: A critisism criticism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dicken's Dickens' meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light.
** The BBC adaptation made no bones about overhauling Esther, keeping her charitable and kind nature, but granting her a sense of humour humor and a sensible, rather than pathologically self-effacing, attitude to her own virtues and vices.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: a critisism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dicken's meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: a A critisism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dicken's meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light.

Added: 233

Changed: 231

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: a critisism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dicken's meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light. The BBC adaptation made no bones about overhauling Esther, keeping her charitable and kind nature, but granting her a sense of humour and a sensible, rather than pathologically self-effacing, attitude to her own virtues and vices.

to:

* AlternateCharacterInterpretation: a critisism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dicken's meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light. light.
**
The BBC adaptation made no bones about overhauling Esther, keeping her charitable and kind nature, but granting her a sense of humour and a sensible, rather than pathologically self-effacing, attitude to her own virtues and vices.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*AlternateCharacterInterpretation: a critisism that is almost as old as the book itself is that rather than the modest humble, honest narrator Dickens intended Esther to be, she comes across as unbearably pious, priggish, disingenuous and self-serving. Her attitude towards Ada sometimes seems more morbid, controlling obsession that the simple sisterly affection Dicken's meant, and her actions sometimes seem willfully self-harming. However, even her harshest critics could hardly fail to lose all sympathy for her, as the parts of the book which concern her relationship with her mother or her heartfelt sympathy for the unfortunates she encounters, show her in a much better light. The BBC adaptation made no bones about overhauling Esther, keeping her charitable and kind nature, but granting her a sense of humour and a sensible, rather than pathologically self-effacing, attitude to her own virtues and vices.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* {{Fridge Brilliance}}: Allan Woodcourt is Welsh. In that time and place, this would have made him a member of a persecuted minority. Who better to ignore prejudice and see Esther for who she really is?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

----

Top