Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27,28 (click to see context) from:
** That could also just mean that since Advocat doesn't ''remember'' the contract, he doesn't know to collect. Or, of course, Lillet's soul could still be affected by the contract when other people aren't because her soul, unlike theirs, is going back in time. (But either way, as noted, Advocat doesn't benefit because the wording of the contract means he has to actively claim her soul and he doesn't realize he can.)
to:
** That could also just mean that since Advocat doesn't ''remember'' the contract, he doesn't know to collect. Or, of course, Lillet's soul could still be affected by the contract when other people aren't because her soul, unlike theirs, is going back in time. (But either way, as noted, Advocat doesn't benefit because the wording of the contract means he has to actively claim her soul and he doesn't realize he can.can; possibly Lillet set it up that way intentionally just in case.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
to:
** That could also just mean that since Advocat doesn't ''remember'' the contract, he doesn't know to collect. Or, of course, Lillet's soul could still be affected by the contract when other people aren't because her soul, unlike theirs, is going back in time. (But either way, as noted, Advocat doesn't benefit because the wording of the contract means he has to actively claim her soul and he doesn't realize he can.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
** If Contracts still exist, this also means Lillet's name is suddenly on any other deal she made in the thousands of years of her GroundhogDayLoop. It would be a massive EnemyCivilWar in hell to actually try to sort it out, especially since nobody remembers her making such contracts in the first place, so it could be viewed as some weird "glitch in the system." JohnConstantine, eat your heart out.
to:
** If Contracts still exist, this also means Lillet's name is suddenly on any other deal she made in the thousands of years of her GroundhogDayLoop. It would be a massive EnemyCivilWar in hell to actually try to sort it out, especially since nobody remembers her making such contracts in the first place, so it could be viewed as some weird "glitch in the system." JohnConstantine, " [[ComicBook/{{Hellblazer}} John Constantine]], eat your heart out.
Changed line(s) 27,29 (click to see context) from:
----
<<|WildMassGuessing|>>
<<|WildMassGuessing|>>
to:
<<|WildMassGuessing|>>
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
** Easy. She was adopted. Also, the "Magic Academy" was something Gammel guessed at being a possible explanation for Lillet knowing the spells she does in the second timeline, and she went SureLetsGoWithThat. (Since TimeTravel never occured to him) She "borrowed" this explanation as something he would believe when she got even better at magic in later timelines.
to:
** Easy. She was adopted. Also, the "Magic Academy" "Magical Society" was something Gammel guessed at being a possible explanation for Lillet knowing the spells she does in the second timeline, and she went SureLetsGoWithThat. (Since TimeTravel never occured to him) She "borrowed" this explanation as something he would believe when she got even better at magic in later timelines.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
to:
** Easy. She was adopted. Also, the "Magic Academy" was something Gammel guessed at being a possible explanation for Lillet knowing the spells she does in the second timeline, and she went SureLetsGoWithThat. (Since TimeTravel never occured to him) She "borrowed" this explanation as something he would believe when she got even better at magic in later timelines.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
* You're all forgetting the fact that when Lillet asks Advocat about Bartido's contract, he denies "consorting with him". So, maybe, only the things that ''Lillet herself'' owns are what travel back in time with her since she's the only one affected by the loops.
to:
* You're all forgetting the fact that when Lillet asks Advocat about Bartido's contract, he denies "consorting with him". So, maybe, only the things that ''Lillet herself'' owns are what travel back in time with her her, since she's the only one affected by the loops.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
to:
*You're all forgetting the fact that when Lillet asks Advocat about Bartido's contract, he denies "consorting with him". So, maybe, only the things that ''Lillet herself'' owns are what travel back in time with her since she's the only one affected by the loops.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
to:
*The only problem with this theory being that Lillet is not an orphan, as the Epilogue clearly states that her ''parents'' are proud of her. Having parents = not an orphan. Also, Gammel mentions that Lillet was a student at the Magical Society before being selected from there to go to the Magic Academy.
