Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* AFoolForAClient : Jensen decides to represent himself.
to:
* AFoolForAClient : Jensen decides to represent himself. When he says that this is his intention, the judge reminds him that this means he has a fool for a client.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AFoolForAClient : Jensen decides to represent himself.
Added DiffLines:
* MurderByMistake: Subverted. The murder was designed to look like Harold Jensen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
%%Administrivia/All spoiler tags have been removed.
Marjorie Jensen, the wife of criminal attorney Harold Jensen, is murdered.
!!As this is a Recap page all SPOILERS are unmarked per policy
Marjorie Jensen, the wife of criminal attorney Harold Jensen, is murdered.
!!As this is a Recap page all SPOILERS are unmarked per policy
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* LeftHanging: The end of the episode implies that the defendant, [[spoiler:Harold Jensen]], will return in a future episode to appeal the conviction. Neither [[spoiler:Jensen]] nor the appeal is ever addressed again.
to:
* LeftHanging: The end of the episode implies that the defendant, [[spoiler:Harold Jensen]], Harold Jensen, will return in a future episode to appeal the conviction. Neither [[spoiler:Jensen]] Jensen nor the appeal is ever addressed again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* LeftHanging: The end of the episode implies that the defendant, [[spoiler:Harold Jensen]], will return in a future episode to appeal the conviction. Neither [[spoiler:Jensen]] nor the appeal is ever addressed again.
to:
* LeftHanging: The end of the episode implies that the defendant, [[spoiler:Harold Jensen]], will return in a future episode to appeal the conviction. Neither [[spoiler:Jensen]] nor the appeal is ever addressed again.again.
* TilMurderDoUsPart
* TilMurderDoUsPart
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* EvilLawyerJoke: After a defense attorney questions why a criminal would kill another defense attorney instead the district attorney on the case, Briscoe quips that someone might actually care about the murder of a district attorney.
to:
* EvilLawyerJoke: After a defense attorney questions why a criminal would kill another defense attorney instead of the district attorney on the case, Briscoe quips that someone might actually care about the murder of a district attorney.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* LeftHanging: The end of the episode implies that the defendant, [[spoiler:Harold Jensen]], will return in a future episode to appeal his conviction. Neither [[spoiler:Jensen]] nor the appeal is ever addressed again.
to:
* LeftHanging: The end of the episode implies that the defendant, [[spoiler:Harold Jensen]], will return in a future episode to appeal his the conviction. Neither [[spoiler:Jensen]] nor the appeal is ever addressed again.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EvilLawyerJoke: After a defense attorney questions why a criminal would kill another defense attorney instead the district attorney on the case, Briscoe quips that someone might actually care about the murder of a district attorney.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* LeftHanging: The end of the episode implies that the defendant, [[spoiler:Harold Jensen]], will return in a future episode to appeal his conviction. Neither [[spoiler:Jensen]] nor the appeal is ever addressed again.
