Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
-->Try to make sense of the unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE]].
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Making this more laconic.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule, and it's without a reason that's logical for the work's universe, or wasn't explicitly established or implied to be possible beforehand.
to:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule, and it's violates its own rules without a reason that's logical for the work's universe, reason or wasn't explicitly established or implied to be possible beforehand.prior setup.
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
-->[-Try to make sense of the unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE]].-]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trying to fix a run-on sentence, which is a grammar mistake.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
The story directly contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule, and it's also without a reason that's logical for the work's universe, or it simply wasn't explicitly established or even implied to be possible beforehand.
to:
The story directly contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule, and it's also without a reason that's logical for the work's universe, or it simply wasn't explicitly established or even implied to be possible beforehand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
The story directly contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule, and it's also without a reason that's logical for the work’s universe, or it simply wasn't explicitly established or even implied to be possible beforehand.
to:
The story directly contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule, and it's also without a reason that's logical for the work’s work's universe, or it simply wasn't explicitly established or even implied to be possible beforehand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule. It's without a reason that's logical for the work’s universe, or wasn't established or implied to be possible beforehand.
to:
The story directly contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule. It's rule, and it's also without a reason that's logical for the work’s universe, or it simply wasn't explicitly established or even implied to be possible beforehand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule. It's without a reason that's logical for the works' universe, or wasn't established or implied to be possible beforehand.
to:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule. It's without a reason that's logical for the works' work’s universe, or wasn't established or implied to be possible beforehand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixing a run-on sentence.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule without a reason that's logical for the works' universe, or wasn't established or implied to be possible beforehand.
to:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a previously established rule rule. It's without a reason that's logical for the works' universe, or wasn't established or implied to be possible beforehand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Mainly, I used stuff from the main page to try revising this.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a rule established earlier in the story.
to:
The story contradicts itself by breaking a rule previously established earlier in rule without a reason that's logical for the story.works' universe, or wasn't established or implied to be possible beforehand.
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
-->[-Try to make sense of the unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE]]-].
to:
-->[-Try to make sense of the unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE]]-].HERE]].-]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Inspired by Patrick H Willems
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
Logic gap in the story.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
-->[-Try to make sense of the unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE.]]-]
to:
-->[-Try to make sense of the unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE.]]-]HERE]]-].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
-->[-Try to make sense of the unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE]]-]
to:
-->[-Try to make sense of the unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE]]-]HERE.]]-]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
-->[-Visit unabridged version [[PlotHole HERE]]-]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
PLOT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!
to:
Changed line(s) 3,5 (click to see context) from:
-->[-[[PlotHole GOODNIGHT!]]-]
----
<<|LaconicWiki|>>
----
<<|LaconicWiki|>>
to:
----
<<|LaconicWiki|>>
----
