Follow TV Tropes

Following

Archived Discussion Main / VaginaDentata

Go To

This is discussion archived from a time before the current discussion method was installed.


Janitor: Slight edit there. Please no "this editor", "this troper", or "I" above the examples.

Cassius335: Will the current version do?

Janitor: The fear thing gave it a better hook, I thought. Less in-joke-y without the Troper bit, too.

Cassius335: The "fear thing" ruins the joke, actually... it's hooking too early, if you will. It also screws the context somewhat.

LATER: If I understand the original intent correctly, you may wish to cross-reference this page

Janitor: I see your point. That bathos was what I was thinking of; the analytics about castration fear fairly formally stated, then bang, the zinger. I'll give a try all joined up, to see if that comes on stronger. // shortly later: Well, it seems to work better, for me, that way.

Cassius335: edited it slightly, to try and get back the original context (the 'fear' that it's going to hurt still seems kinda silly. Of course it's going to hurt)

Janitor: bingo!


Red Shoe: Yes, I know We Are Not Wikipedia. Still think it was funny.

CA Lieber: Makes the joke, I think


Count Spatula: That Scott Anderson page really bugs me, because its really easy to understand why women would not evolve dentata from an evolutionary standpoint.

fleb: Bugs me, too. Cutting it, since it contributes basically nothing.

* Scott Aaronson examines reasons why women do not have these.
**Having read the linked page, it is obvious whoever Scott Aaronson is, he is neither a doctor nor a biologist, as he doesn't even appear to grasp the evolutionary benefits of sexual reproduction as opposed to asexual parthenogenesis.


fleb: Um, for what definition of "teeth," '07/15/08 at 08:13 AM by me 58.179.122.199'? Cutting for now. Sounds like one of those urban legends.

* Although very rare, some women do have vaginal teeth, but no matter how many kegels you do, the muscles in that area aren't strong enough for the teeth to do more than tickle.


Cambias: A question: why does the article specifically mention "Northern Native American" as the source of the myth. Given that it has a Latin name and shows up in cultures as diverse as Guinea and the Maori, couldn't that be, um, cut? I await discussion before, um, snipping it off. Out. Whatever.

Later: Since nobody has rushed to defend it, I'm, um, cutting it.

Rothul: Original author here. I took the phrasing from the wikipedia article which has since been changed. I suspect the Latin name is a neologism, however.

Top