TVTropes Now available in the app store!
Open

Follow TV Tropes

Reviews Fanfic / Wreck It Ralph 2

Go To

•••
Peterstanden99 Since: Jan, 2021
06/10/2021 13:07:13
•••

Related Villains

You know the “Not So Different” part in this story where it says “Princess Vanellope’s game got unplugged because she jealously murdered all the other game characters and drove her arcade out of business.“, I was like “Oh, wow! That’s what Turbo did to Road Blasters in Litwak’s Arcade 26 years ago, now Princess Vanellope did the same thing, but she did it to all the games in her Arcade!” Both Turbo and Princess Vanellope are both so related, that is awesome that we have two relatable villains in this CLIMAX!

•••
megagutsman (Seven Years' War)
06/09/2021 23:00:46
•••

I would say this is still not a good review. You barely delve into the fanfic itself and simply mention one specific scene so, people like me that haven\'t read it, have no way to know if it is good or bad.

•••
Valiona Since: Mar, 2011
06/10/2021 13:07:13
•••

I think a lot of reviews would benefit from better organization. In my opinion, a well-written review would consist of the following.

  1. A sentence or two describing the work. This is especially important for fanfics, since while many people have heard about Wreck-It Ralph and its sequel, few have heard about this fanfic.
  2. An introductory paragraph that outlines the reviewer's general opinion on the work.
  3. Two or more body paragraphs that go into detail about the good and bad aspects of the work, providing examples when possible. Ideally, they should go into rather important aspects of the work rather than going into minutiae. I'd say the content of this review deserves a paragraph, but shouldn't overshadow the evaluation of the rest of the work.
  4. A conclusion that sums up the review.

Basically, the problem here is that the review...

  1. Immediately goes into a rant about a specific part of a work.
  2. Doesn't describe the work in question.
  3. Doesn't discuss any other aspects of the work.
  4. Concludes rather abruptly without saying whether the reviewer recommends the fic.

Edit: I didn't mention this earlier, but this is a two-part review, which is not allowed by the site's rules.


Leave a Comment:

Top