Follow TV Tropes
Hey guys, this is my first review on TV Tropes, so please give me criticism to help me in the future. =D Thanks for reading!
I'm sorry, but I think Mr. Enter is a very poor reviewer. I'm going to give 2 reasons why I think this.
Reason #1. He isn't likable.
A. He doesn't seem to respect other's opinions or viewpoints. In this video, he claims that trolling and cyberbullying aren't different, and says anyone with a different mindset about it will the be blocked, and that they are "using it as an excuse for bullies to do what they do". First off, cyberbullying and trolling are different, but due to the 400 word limit, I can't fully explain it. Look for my comment on his video or this dA journal for more info.
B. He's a major hypocrite.
In his Fairly OddPet review, he makes a joke, making Nick look like child abusers, when he said once that he's against cruel and mean spirited jokes to someone who doesn't deserve it. Props to YouTube users Heart 2 Heartnet 24 and Super Suck 64 for finding this flaw.
C. He's just a complete jerk. Whether it be his growing ego as the weeks go by, his undeserved insults and mean spirited behavior towards writers of shows, or his infamous tendency to confuse trolling with actual criticism, I can safely say the dude's a jerk.
Reason #2. His reviews just plain stink.
A. He's not funny at all. Most of his jokes are either bland, mean spirited as mentioned above, or him acting as another person or character, which even my mom thinks is stupid. Seriously, a kid who made this YTP has better VA skills than him.
B. Hypocritical, and overall weak reasoning.
In one of his Courage the Cowardly dog reviews, he excused everything Courage did that was illogical, as just something in "cartoony fashion", but in his Breadwinners review, he questions things like "why the plane was still driving". He also seems to take silly episodes really seriously. Examples of this is his "Dexter vs Santa's Claws" review and his "Town and Out" review.
Finally finished! =)
I've tried to listening to his videos and I can't stand him either.
@TT 454 I don't blame ya, dude.
I can't help but agree. I seen a couple of videos and I still wonder what do some see in him? He bores me. And to add to your point to the fanbase. I made a review of my own about him. Somehow, it has been flagged, much like the other negative reviews here.
@Luigikart64 Yeah, mostly all the negative reviews about him are flagged by butthurt fans. I'm pretty sure throughout time mines will be flagged too. Lol, his fans just make themselves look worse.
If it isn't by tomorrow morning, you'll be extremely lucky.
Well you asked for criticism so here it is. This is a terrible review.
"Reason #3. 90% of his fanbase. Oh god,most of his fanbase just sucks! Whenever someone tries to post criticism, that they think is negative, they overreact and attack them through the comments. If someone doesn't like the video, they attack them too, and pull the moronic "don't like don't comment" excuse. They even made a user here leave because he liked a negative review on Mr. Enter."
This is supposed to be a review of a work, not its fans. Your opinion of Mr. Enter's fans has no place here.
I'll agree that I don't really like how the review is written, but that's due to my grammar elitism mostly.
I think that the criticism of a work's fans is justified from time to time. Fans are a tour de force in large numbers - they create fan works, they tell their friends and spread the word around, and for better or for worse the behavior of the fans usually shapes a work's appearance. Whovians act like crazy buggers over different Doctors or writers, MLP fans have been known to fetishize cartoon horses and attack people over stupid things etc. Though those fans may not make up the majority of the fanbase, or accurately express the work or the saner side of the fanbase, the actions of those fans shape how the work is viewed through their actions.
Alongside Mr Enter and his tendency to rant about dissenters on his DA (a habit which he may have curbed since the last time I heard about him), his fans have caused a gigantic fuss regarding his skill as a reviewer and whether his comments were "professional" or summed up his personality at all. That may not be the majority of the fanbase, but on TV Tropes in particular that's how they hit - he made some crappy comments about a guy who said some crap about him, someone else made a negative review, and the guy's fanbase kicked off the comments by insisting the reviewer was that same first guy. And when other tropers saw similar issues and made similar reviews, those reviews gained the same arguments repeated ad nauseum until the arguments faded away.
If you saw something akin to the original Mr Enter review clusterfuck, and then read, say, a negative Game Grumps review with a reaction more like "Alright, I think you missed the point a bit and would enjoy something else, chill out a bit" - what would seem more approachable? The comment section with 50 or so comments saying "No, So&so's behavior is NOT out of line" or "Look, this isn't something you seem to be into, I think you've got some stuff wrong and would enjoy other series'"?
A rabid fanbase can shape how a work is perceived. Saying "I enjoy this work, but the fans piss me off"? Perfectly fine point to make.
Speaking as a Mr. Enter fan here. You have a point about the censoring reviews (and the Troll video).
However, I'm still certain that mention of fans colors the review. There's a reason that any Justin Beiber reviews don't mention his fangirls as a reason he sucks (mainly bias and the Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment).
As for why I like Mr. Enter. Its because he makes an effort to avert Bias Steamroller (note that he did a video on his top 25 favorite modern SpongeBob episodes, among other things). Of course it may not always seem that way depending on how attached one is to one of his subjects
I'm not flagging this, because Like I said you make good points. I wish you good luck when the inevitable Fan Dumb comes though and hope that the mods don't delete this.
@Emptybee @Morning Star 1337 Yeah, I took out the fan mention out of the review, and now I'm going to save it for an independent rant on DA. If you guys want, I'll link both the extended Mr. Enter review and his fanbase rant when I finish it.
@Emptybee Now that that the fan mentioning is cleared up, can you elaborate how this review is terrible, so I can do better? Thanks dude. :D
@Morning Star 1337 Yeah, thanks for the help, and not flagging. Pretty sure it's gonna get flagged by tomorrow morning tho'. :)
@Mr Mallard Well, I've decided to move the fan discussion to it's own rant on dA. Wanna discuss this more some time?
@ Aldo930 That'll be nice. :)
I remember listening to his review of that Powerpuff Girls episode "Town And Out" and actually laughing at how over-offended he was by the episode. "Town And Out" was one of my favourite PPG episodes when I was a kid, mainly because I just loved how exaggerated Citiesville was. But Enter think it's unwatchable. To me, the fact that Citiesville is such an awful place is what makes it so funny, much like with the Simpsons episode "Homer's Enemy", and of course we know they'll move back to Townsville at the end. It doesn't over-extended itself either. My favourite PPG episodes were the unusual, sitcommy ones, instead of the "giant monster attacks and the girls beat it up" ones.
Another episode that a lot of PPG fans hated that I absolutely loved (even moreso than Town And Out) is "A Very Special Blossom". A lot of fans say the ending is sad, but I was pissing myself laughing at the ending. I felt that Blossom absolutely deserved what she got. Perhaps this Enter guy will make a whiny review of that, too.
^^ Well, nobody's flagged it. So you're lucky.
I used to kind of like him, but nowadays I find him to be so insufferable- especially when his ego started to bloom and he started viewing himself as the supreme intelligence of all animation. He is to animation what Sarkesian is to games- a puritanical prude overoffended by anything that slightly fringes on his sensitive standards.
"B. Hypocritical in reasoning. In one of his Courage the Cowardly dog reviews, he excused everything Courage did that was illogical, as just something in "cartoony fashion", but in his Breadwinners review, he questions things like "why the plane was still driving"."
Yeah I've noted things like that too. Trying to sniff out logic in his negative reviews seems to always hinge on one thing- he doesn't get that that's part of the fucking joke.
Mr Millard@ Normally, i don't think fanbases should be reviewed alongside the product. However, i think there are a few exceptions, namely being Mr. Enter's Fanbase and their attempts to censor the negative reviews here, via flagging. If a fanbase has tried to censor opinions in the past, then i think they are open to criticism.
I will admit that a bad fanbase could tune you out of a series, such as MLP. While there is a majority who might be good, Like they say, the minority are the loudest. And the loudests are completely scary people.
Oh wow, it's not flagged. :D A miracle!
@TT 454 Exactly! I felt he took that episode waaay too seriously, which the episode really isn't. The episode never felt that mean spirited and sad, is the guy that into the show? Geesh, it's like reading the tearjerker tropes.
@Asger Thanks god I'm not the only one who notices his huge ass ego.
Well, time to finish the review before a rabid fan appears. Thanks for your support guys. =D
Fully finished the review. Again, thanks for the support guys. And thanks TMME fans for not flagging...
@The Awesome User, I'll admit you surprised me by listening to what I said. And so, since you're clearly serious about improving and you asked so nicely, I'll take a stab at a critiquing the rest of your review.
First off let me state that I'm not really the best person to defend Mr. Enter's reviews themselves. I watch him primarily for his MLP reviews and rarely watch Admirable Animations or Animated Atrocities - which seems to be where all the heat is generated. So I'll primarily be addressing the issues with your review not trying to argue counter-examples.
"Reason #1. He isn't likable."
Obviously it's helpful for any celebrity figure to be likeable - in brings in and helps retain viewers. Still likability is extremely subjective and when you lead off talking about something so subjective it essentially shouts to the reader "hey this is just gonna be a big pile of my opinions". No one cares about your opinions unless 1) they already care about you or 2) your opinions reinforce what they already believe anyway.
"He doesn't seem to respect other's opinions or viewpoints."
To support this you talk about how he doesn't distinguish between trolls and cyberbullies, arguing that he should. But that's just you and Mr. Enter having a difference of opinion, which in turn makes you - not him guilty - of not respecting others viewpoints.
"He's a major hypocrite."
Two points here. First a single example is way too flimsy to hang a charge like "major hypocrite" on. something like that deserves its own blog post with multiple supporting examples. Second, even if Mr. Enter is guilty of exactly the same behavior he mocked Nick for, that doesn't make him a hypocrite it makes him a flawed human who doesn't always follow his own rules. Unless you catching him saying it's okay when HE does it it's not hypocrisy.
"He's just a complete jerk."
A purely subjective opinion with no supporting evidence offered.
"Reason #2. His reviews just plain stink."
Subjective opinion again.
"He's not funny at all."
Once again, Humor is subjective.
"and overall weak reasoning."
Here at last you finally get into the kind of real meat a proper review should focus on. It just needs to be fleshed out more - use examples, compare and contrast his arguments, go into detail. If Mr. Enter's reviews are biased, then show me the bias. don't just tell me it's there and expect me to take your word for it.
Actually, not following the rules you set for others is hypocrisy.
@Emptybee Ehh, you got a lot of things wrong dude. First off, Subjective - "based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions." That's what a review is, based on your opinions. My review of Mr. Enter is not supposed to be true facts, so a review being subjective isn't a problem. That pretty much sums up a lot of the errors in your comment, but there's more.
"But that's just you and Mr. Enter having a difference of opinion, which in turn makes you - not him guilty - of not respecting others viewpoints." You forgot to read: "and says anyone with a different mindset about it will the be blocked". I do respect his opinions, but he said anyone who didn't think trolling was cyberbullying was "using it as an excuse" and will get their comment blocked. That's not really respecting an opinion.
"First a single example is way too flimsy to hang a charge like "major hypocrite" on. something like that deserves its own blog post with multiple supporting examples. Second, even if Mr. Enter is guilty of exactly the same behavior he mocked Nick for, that doesn't make him a hypocrite it makes him a flawed human who doesn't always follow his own rules. Unless you catching him saying it's okay when HE does it it's not hypocrisy."
First, there's a 400 word limit on here, so I can't put much examples. I've also said many times I'm making an extended review on DeviantArt. so chill :). Also, do you have any proof of him being guilty of that Nick joke? There's also been a lot of instances of Mr. Enter being a hypocrite without apologizing (claims to respect opinions, does the thing mentioned above, ect.)
"A purely subjective opinion with no supporting evidence offered." Read above in my comment about the subjective stuff. Also, please remember there's a word limit, I can't give much evidence.
"Here at last you finally get into the kind of real meat a proper review should focus on. It just needs to be fleshed out more - use examples, compare and contrast his arguments, go into detail. If Mr. Enter's reviews are biased, then show me the bias. don't just tell me it's there and expect me to take your word for it." Ehh, you're forgetting again that this review has a word limit and you can't do all that much. Also remember I'm making an extended review once I get the time. Also, I did try my best to show proof of the hypocritical and weak reasoning. I said that he lets things slide in some cartoons, but not in others, and takes episodes not to be taken seriously actually seriously.
Thanks for giving me this criticism and trying to help, but a lot of your points didn't make that much sense. Thanks for your attempt, however. =)
@Emptybee Just to add, "something like that deserves its own blog post with multiple supporting examples." Really man? Come on.
I seriously don't get this.
When something post a negative review on this guy, you have fans trying to flag it and telling the person who made it to elaborate more. They say that he or she shouldn't do this or that or what not.
When something post a positive review on this guy, there would rarely be any discussion. Not even his haters would talk on it.
@acquah Yeah, in the review below this one, there's 0 comments.
^^ I generally do not comment on reviews that much. Regardless of their tone. Still it does seen strange. Maybe the fanbase that the review is so perfect that there isn't any they could add, so they don't comment?
@Morning Star 1337 So basically, they only accpet opinions that agree with theirs.
To be fair, I don't personally find anything wrong or disagreeable on how he reviews a lot of things. Now his comments or rants on the people are out there and unneeded, but as for how he points out how terrible a lot of the stuff he reviews is...well he's not wrong. Upon reviewing the material myself the source material is pretty terrible.
^^ Yeah between that and the reaction previous negative reviews have, I would have to say that yes, that is the case.
^^ Yeah there is the matter of the source material. Then again He Panned It, Now He Sucks can still rear its ugly head.
I'm actually a Mr. enter fan and I'm actually okay with this review.
@Disney Villain =D
don't use wikipedia for your definition of troll.
DA review planned after Christmas. :) Thanks again guys.
@qtjinla15 The answer is simple. Negativity breeds discussion. Now, I don't think he's the best thing ever, but I don't think he's scum of the earth either. I like some of his reviews, particularly his "Admirable Animation" series, but good god is he ever insufferable otherwise.
Cool, a new comment. :D
@DJ Vinyl Scratch That is true. Also, happy 2015! =D
Sweet, 41 comments. :)
Another thing I've noticed, and it pains me to say this since I have been watching his videos since he started reviewing MLP season 4, he's let his increasing popularity (or infamy if you want to look at it that way) get to his head. He honestly thinks he'll get his cartoon on a major cartoon channel. It's not the biggest case of Small Name, Big Ego I've seen, but it is noticeable. I'm sure he's an alright guy, but there's a reason his videos are as divisive as they are.
Oh yeah I forgot he had a cartoon concept going around. Was there any news regarding that?
@Scolipendra Right, his ego is to the levels of laughably bad.
@Morning Star 1337 Any news? Well, I've heard a person say that the way he held the voice acting auditions was badly handled. I've read it in a comment section, which his fans didn't like too much. I'll try my best to find the comment.
I've said it before but if he wants to get his cartoon seen, he ought to do it on the Internet; it's far, far easier anyhow.
@Aldo930 Maybe but I think he thinks that getting on Cartoon Network, the Hub or Disney (I really don't think he'll ever consider Nickelodeon) would help him make more money or get mainstream acceptance more quickly.
Oh yeah, and one of the characters are clearly a Mabel ripoff.
^^ Nickelodeon is his best bet, but unfortunately, he thinks Nick is evil. Cartoon Network, maybe, but the others, barely even a chance. And that's only if they let him in and don't do a background check.
@Aldo930 Yeah, he's just better off on the internet.
Okay, is it me, or are the adult cartoon character accounts (Hank Hill, Bart Simpson, ect) on YouTube really just Mr. Enter? They all share the same exact opinions as him, and have almost all of his videos on their liked playlist. It's pretty fishy to me. Just look at the comment sections to know what I'm talking about. If this is true, kinda hypocritical since he said Seth Mc Far. uses Brian as a puppet on his views, but he's doing the same, maybe worse, with those accounts.
^ I checked out 2 Ko TH Novelty accounts on his recent video, they both do seem to be Single Purpose accounts (of the two only one actualy had posted any videos, and it was only one at that).
This seems to bear some investigation.
Anyone want to link these accounts?
@Aldo930 Sure thing.
http://www.youtube.com/user/GoldenCorvette < Bart Simpson
http://www.youtube.com/user/VanillaCoffee1985 < Bobby Hill
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy8x4CRCnja08JKZnzjFkHA < Hank Hill
There's more, look through the comment sections.
Not sure if this is relevant or not, but the links show the following original usernames of "Bart" and "Bobby".
Vanilla Coffee 1985
Theory: He could have made these accounts earlier to give himself likes or something, but when he started review Simpsons and King of Hill, he changed it for whatever reason and made them his puppets for his opinions.
This bears the question on why change them to novelty accounts though?
This could very well be somebody else. Don't call him on it just yet.
@Morning Star 1337 That is something I do not know for sure. My best guess is just for fun, or that's how he wants the characters to be/act.
@Aldo930 Yeah, this is all theory.
People make sock puppet accounts on youtube all the time, so I highly doubt that he made the Hank, Bobby and Bart ones. It's probably just some of his fans.
@marston That may be true, but there seems to be more evidence that he did. I don't know..
^ Hey did these accounts include Patrick Star, Peggy Hill or Ed(d)? I'm watching the latest video right now and I'm not sure if people are supposed to start off the review with a rant.
@Morning Star 1337 Which video are you talking about?
^ Mr Enter's latest. Elf Bowling. The rant in quest seems more vitriolic than usual. And considering what series t is in I'mmga gonna say he think the movie is the epitomenote using the older definition, which just means "an example" as opposed to "the Most Triumpant Example' of Video Game Movies Suck
@Morning Star 1337 Nevermind, I know what you're talking bout'. I've seen a comment by Hank Hill saying he "divorced" Peggy Hill. Mr. Enter seems to hate the character a lot. Even someone in the comment section said they've never seen someone hated Peggy Hill that much. More evidence!
Speaking of Hank, this account seems to be the most used "puppet" account. Hank replies to comments that request Mr. Enter with odd answers. One person asked if he would reviw Rick and Morty, and Hank replied with "He probably won't, because he stated he doesn't like drool". How exactly would he remember this when he said it, just to answer someone's question? Just so much evidence.
^ Doing some Devil's Advocacy here. He could have mentioned that line in a dA journal or something. Of course the state would still b obscure for anyone but the man himself or his most obsessive fans to remember.
I mean statement, not state
Got to be honest here. It seems like this review is more jumping on the bandwagon instead of your actual thoughts. Needing people to point out things you state in your review, no explanation as why his jokes are bland you said they are, or how that YTP maker has better VA skill than him makes me feel this. I could be wrong, but that's just my thoughts towards this review.
@Awesomekid42 Uh, keep in mind that there's a limit to the words in a review, so I couldn't give much explanation. I didn't really want to copy any one else, I wanted to share my personal thoughts on the reviewer. If it weren't my honest thoughts, I wouldn't waste time making this review. Also, if you're talking about Heart 2 Heartnet 24 and Super Suck 64 "needing to point out things", I knew the hypocrisy in the joke already, I'm mentioning these people because they mentioned it in the comment section, attempting to give Mr. Enter actual criticism, but his fans did what they always do. Thanks for your comment, but there were lots of flaws too. =)
@Morning Star 1337 Yeah, I know I've heard/read him say that, but it seems kinda fishy someone would remember that just to answer a question.
@The Awesome User I know about the 400 word limit. But a lot of words you spent could of been on elaboration rather than spending words on the random link to the YTP, random reference about your mom, and mean-spirited comment about his growing ego.
@Awesomekid42 Dude, even if I deleted those points, there wouldn't be that much space anyways. And to be fair, honestly, the comment about his ego isn't that mean spirited. It's just the truth.
Well that killed the conversation. :(
^ That does seem unusual. He has a video on the things he's not willing to review. We can discuss that.
@Morning Star 1337 Ok, sure.
here's the link.
@Morning Star 1337 Nothing is really all there to say about the video, but I kinda find it hypocritical that he's reviewing Problem Solverz, which has been reviewed by a lot, but won't review Foodfight, which has also been reviewed a lot. I could be wrong, though.
His account has been terminated due to copyright issues. Interesting?
He says it's due to Viacom sending takedown notices, and he's filing counter-claims against them. I know companies can behave like big babies sometimes, and I'm on his side on this issue. I didn't see anything in his videos that should violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
I'm not surprised, weren't they one of the companies that supported the Stop Online "Piracy" (Read: Fandom) Act?
It's still suspended. I'm kinda of scared to give my opinion here. If I say I'm happy about it, 'd sound like a douche.
I'm no fan of the guy but he absolutely shouldn't have been banned, it's fair use for reviewers to use footage of items that they've reviewing.
I don't normally say stuff like this for fear of sounding more immature than I am, but seriously, fuck Viacom. They're one of the biggest companies responsible for false takedown notices.
@Elmo3000 That is true.
What're your guy's thoughts on this? http://goo.gl/NXmpw6
Also, before viewing the link, I suggest downloading Hide Images if you have chrome. :)
Lol, his account's been banned? Well, to be honest, Mr. Enter didn't really deserve it because he was using those clips only for reviewing purposes, which is covered by YouTube's "Fair Use" policy, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't amused by this. :D
Also, there's a channel that uploads Angry Birds cartoons that is getting their uploads taken down right now, that might disappear soon too. However, that channel actually deserves it (because the episodes aren't being reviewed), even if Rovio makes their Angry Birds cartoons free to view online anyway.
Also agreed with Elmo3000, Viacom is awful. Warner is just as bad.
@TT 454 Lol, the funniest thing is how his fans are reacting. Saying that they'd "kill" Viacom over this.
Cool, it's been a month since this review was posted. Thanks guys, and thank you too Mr. Enter fanboys, this review has not been flagged yet. =D
And I totally forgot about that extended dA review..
Congratulations, give yourself a medal, Review Person. You actually managed to create the only genuinely entertaining Mr. Enter-related thing ever.
@Bastard1 Wow, thanks. =D It's awesome to hear I entertained someone.
@27849 >Kill "Viacom"
Yeah that is ridiculous. If a small amount of butthurt Fan Dumb actually managed to drive a company to bankruptcy, I'll check for a risen Cocytus and Flying Pigs.
@Morning Star 1337 No, they didn't mean bankruptcy, they meant coming to "kill" the people who work at Viacom.
That's arguably even worse. I'm afraid a couple of them will probably try to do it.
@Aldo930 What if you see this on the news..
I'll have predicted it.
@Aldo930 Like, they'd be one of most dangerous fanbases.
Kinda bored now.
Anyways...anyone watching the NFL? We're at the Superbowl again. :D
I'd heard some of his fans were vandalizing his ED page to make it more positive.
@Aldo930 Seriously..? I gotta see this for myself.
Found this comment from Mr. Enter's DA page:
"Daan N Lseventeen 1 day ago New member Hobbyist Digital Artist
Well, I try to fix the vandalism on your Encyclopedia Dramatica page and get banned for doing so. I know you probably do not care too much about this, but I feel that this is the time to do something. Get that site taken down. It is full of lies and uncalled nudity and violence. It needs to be removed from society. Please, Mr Enter; help me win this."
I knew it, I just knew it.
@Aldo930 These people..
@Aldo930 @The Awesome User These fantards really don't want ANY negative images of their little "angel", don't they?
At least he's not dumb enough to try and get rid of the site himself, a la Chris Chan.
And I guess we have to lump some of his fanboys up to... that guy.
@acquah Lmao! Why can't people just let this go? Though ED can be offensive, it does give some good criticism, and good humor. If I'd ever get an ED article, I'd laugh my butt off.
I feel like this isn't a comments page on a review any more but rather a misplaced forum thread for people who don't like Mr Enter. Which is fine and I would mostly agree with you but it's been going on for a bit long now.
Also it's kind of a no-brainer that some of Mr Enter's fans are completely nucking futs, every fanbase has those kinds of people, not just cartoon reviewers on YouTube.
Also not entirely related but 'ED' is to 'good humour' what 'Burger King' is to 'gourmet cuisine'. Cheap and fast and it tastes alright but it's not what anyone would call high quality.
I can see where you're coming from. The comments section may seem like another forum on a guy people shouldn't be talkin' about so much, especially when you consider that he's get pissy when someone agrees with a negative review of him.
I know there are other fanboys that plague fanbases. But when I see people acting like them, I point out their stupidity.
And TBH, I don't find ED to be supremely humorous either. I know that the ED article on Enter gets some good points out (i.e. his extreme hypocrisy, his sappy behavior, etc.), but other than that I find ED to be 4chan's demented version of Wikipedia.
@Elmo3000 Nah, I'm cool with all the comments. Though it'd be more appropriate somewhere else, I'm still OK with all the discussions. =)
I wouldn't consider ED high quality either, but it still manages gets a laugh outta me, as long as you don't take it personally or too seriously.
@acquah Pretty much what I said to Elmo. But there's something about Mr. Enter's fanbase that stands out. They're one of the most, well, brainwashed. They view Mr. Enter as perfect, and I've seen even someone criticizes his MIC quality, and got attack by some fans. They seem to like him so much because he dislikes new shows, and they let their nostalgia blind them.
Where did everyone go? o_o
So dead. ):
His channel has come back from the dead, it seems.
@TT 454 Yes, I know. That doesn't really affect anything, though.
However, there's this new thing where people are commentating on his videos.
Commentating like, MST3K style?
@Aldo930 Ahh, no. Here's probably the funniest and most popular one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CaA3ZDGE5JM
They're reviewing the reviewer, then?
@Aldo930 Sort of?
Can you guys please stop bumping this review? I know that people have their opinions, both negative and positive, and I respect that, but seeing the title of this review constantly at the top of the Latest Reviews section starts being a teensy little bit annoying.
I'm fairly sure there is a thread on the forum where you can discuss Mr. Enter to your hearts' content.
@Zu The Skunk Lol, sorry. Luckily that forum is active enough.
Doing a Wiki Walk on ED is kind of like going to a strip club. It looks like a fun place, but a few hours later you start thinking why the hell you went there in the first place. And yes, I just wanted to say that. Sorry for the bump lol
@The Diego 908 gr8
Leave a Comment:
Community Showcase More