The Locked Pages page links to the thread where you can ask for an edit.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
For the Creators Pet part, it should be noted that in the recent crossover for Pokemon 4Ever, she suffered (almost) as much bullying as Linkara and Suede.
Example removed from the page due to edit-war:
- Her RWBY bashing has become especially silly when she called the animation (including the fight scenes) "low fps garbage". That's not how modern (offline pre-rendered) 3D animation works unless there are hardware limitations.
Or directly under Critical Research Failure, maybe with a more neutral rewrite.
Hate Dumb is not literally "haters are ignorant", but more along the lines of "the bad aspects of Hatedom".
It's also not Fan Hater, since there is no mention of fans.
Critical Research Failure is the closest fit, but that page specifies "comment that is so egregiously off-the-scale of inaccuracy that anyone with a cursory knowledge of the subject realizes the writers made the whole thing up."
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
For reference, this was initially filed under He Panned It, Now He Sucks!, and was repeatedly pulled and re-added since not everyone agrees with the assessment.
"Yup. That tasted purple."
One person "disagreed" with it without stating a reason. It's also kind of a fact that JO's statement was either nonsense or at the very least badly worded for the sake of bashing.
I'm not an expert on the YMMV-standards, but wouldn't that mean that every example could be removed by anyone starting an edit-war over it?
Looking at the history
If the person didn't list a reason for getting rid of the statement. IE: Out of context quote, was redacted later, Feels this is a too personal/real life statement etc etc.
You can usually just assume they're an over protective fan trying to defend their devotee's image.
I'm A Pervert not an Asshole!
What exactly does this mean?
"Creator's Pet: Currently the only TGWTG-related reviewer on the Web Original section of the page over there- check for the full reasons."
Hide / Show Replies
It means bad editing.
The entry is telling you to go look at the Web Original section of Creator's Pet to read the actual example. People shouldn't have to hunt around the wiki like that, though, so I've copied the example over here.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
Would it be possible to add Base Breaker? It's already on TGWTG's YMMV page, and could just be copied over.
Hide / Show Replies