Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion VideoGame / TheElderScrollsVSkyrim

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
valdetiosi Since: Jun, 2012
Jun 6th 2012 at 5:09:26 PM •••

I was completing the first Dark Brotherhood quest, where you have to kill Grelond the Kind and so I did. The children went so happy, that I killed the other woman, who was running around circles yelling 'mercy!'. The kids started to hate me. I didn't knew what went wrong. Do you?

Voi Luoja sun kanssas. Hide / Show Replies
SlendidSuit Since: Oct, 2011
Jun 26th 2012 at 7:28:25 AM •••

Well she wasn't really a target. You kinda just murdered an innocent, non-abusive teacher in front of them...

Gimme yer lunch money, dweeb.
DarkStar88 Since: Nov, 2012
Nov 28th 2013 at 9:14:05 PM •••

Go back to assassin school, you get an "F-" in Reconnaissance.

Seriously, observe Grelod's behavior versus the other lady's. The difference between them is crystal clear.

valdetiosi Since: Jun, 2012
Feb 3rd 2016 at 12:51:41 PM •••

Looking at this years back, I finally realized what I did was wrong and simply my stupid mistake. Note to myself: Never play video games under the effects of alcohol.

Voi Luoja sun kanssas.
Dawnwing Since: Sep, 2010
Oct 31st 2014 at 8:59:40 PM •••

I originally posted this on the 0-G Discussion since it was in response to frequent edits to the Career-Ending Injury trope, but now that that page has been moved to "0 to G" and because I've seen it pop up on other pages, I'll just put it here on the main discussion page for later reference:


"Arrow in the knee" is not real Norse slang for getting married. Apparently the line was added in the game as a reference to the fact that Skyrim did not have greaves, as Oblivion did. You can find people saying that that's why it's there as early as late November or early December 2011, shortly after the game was released. Whether that is true or not, I'm not certain.

But anyway, as far as it meaning "getting married", that's only started to be passed around since May 5 2013 (this Tumblr post, posted May 6, seems to be the one that most people are linking to.) If you do some searching online, you'll find plenty of Norwegians saying that it's not a real phrase, they've never heard it before. I've also seen a couple places say that it doesn't even work as a phrase in Scandinavian languages due to the wording. This person did three hours of research and didn't find anything about it meaning "getting married".

"Arrow in the knee = getting married" appears to have originated as a theory/joke that someone posted on Reddit in August 2012.


EDIT: Apparently they just added it as something to give the guards more personality. And here is the guy who wrote the line explaining it.

Edited by Dawnwing
CidSilverWing Paladin of The Light Since: Apr, 2011
Paladin of The Light
Jul 18th 2014 at 2:20:01 PM •••

Faendal's name translates to "Fuckdale" in Norwegian (context: "Fuck!"). Can anyone identify what trope(s) this is?

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Jul 18th 2014 at 3:18:50 PM •••

Foreign Cuss Word?

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
CidSilverWing Since: Apr, 2011
Jul 18th 2014 at 8:53:10 PM •••

I was initially leaning towards Getting Crap Past the Radar or something like that.

MCE Grin and tonic Since: Jan, 2001
Grin and tonic
Mar 26th 2014 at 11:03:47 AM •••

The Gauldur Amulet, in game it gives you 30 point boost to magicka, health and stamina, In the in game material its made out to be artifact of doom. Is this an existing trope?

My latest Trope page: Shapeshifting Failure
random1 Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 22nd 2012 at 7:27:12 PM •••

Is there any evidence that the Forsworn are "genocidally racist"?

[Quote: You can side with the Forsworn who are genocidally racist.] According to the in-game book _The Bear of Markarth_, from 4E 174-176 the Forsworn ruled over the Reach fairly. They committed "some crimes" often [against those Nords] accused of being the harshest towards their native workers". That would be a far cry from genocide. According to the book, it was Ulfric, not the Forsworn, who committed war crimes.

I realize that in-game books aren't always accurate but what evidence is there that this book is not accurate? What evidence is there that the Forsworn are genocidal?

Edited by random1 Hide / Show Replies
EmperorSteele Since: May, 2009
Feb 11th 2012 at 12:33:22 PM •••

This is late, but...

They basically want to kill EVERYONE in Markarth. The feeling I got from talking with the King In Rags is that he wouldn't even want to stop there, if he had the manpower. Though maybe "genocidal" isn't the right term. He's not out to kill any one people, just anyone in and around his territory, be they nord, redguard, elven, kajit, breton, or what have you.

Iaculus Since: May, 2010
Mar 3rd 2012 at 7:43:29 AM •••

Even in the game, Madanach's crew only went after the Silver-Bloods and their hired thugs whilst breaking out of Cidhna Mine. They're not genocidal racists, they're a resistance group slipping into motiveless banditry.

What's precedent ever done for us?
Zaptech Since: Oct, 2010
Apr 25th 2012 at 9:28:38 PM •••

The Forsworn themselves all but outright say that they're going to kill as many Nords as they can while you're visiting in Cidnha Mine.

DarkStar88 Since: Nov, 2012
Nov 28th 2013 at 9:24:33 PM •••

They're "stab first, ask questions never" rebels without a cause AT BEST, and bandits in throwback outfits by any lawful measure. The tribal culture they run on is horribly brutal and backwards, and if by some horror they 'won', the Aldmeri Dominion would briefly thank the Forsworn for clearing out Skyrim for them before marching in themselves.

Edited by 68.13.35.213
gibberingtroper Since: May, 2009
Mar 20th 2012 at 12:23:08 PM •••

To whoever is making these entries, why is it so notable that you can't marry the cat-people and the lizard people? Do you really want that so badly? Do you really think Bethesda wants to go there? Is it really all that amazing that they don't want something in their game that could easily be mistaken for beastiality?

Hide / Show Replies
gibberingtroper Since: May, 2009
Mar 20th 2012 at 12:27:50 PM •••

I find it notable that you can't marry a hagraven.

You can have a one night stand with one but you can't make her an honest woman. Tsk Tsk.

kingkor Since: Dec, 2010
May 5th 2012 at 8:25:22 AM •••

uh you can marry the "lizard People" in game with out cheats its the bosmer that you cant marry along with khajits

PulpoOscuro Since: Jan, 2011
Sep 17th 2012 at 9:07:17 AM •••

I know this is late, but you can be an Argonian or Khajit and marry a human. I don't think the "bestiality" issue is why you can't marry any Argonians or Khajits – it's probably just because there are so few characters of those races in the game anyway.

DarkStar88 Since: Nov, 2012
Nov 28th 2013 at 9:18:29 PM •••

You CAN marry an Argonian. My first-playthrough Dragonborn is happily hitched to Shahvee and has two adopted girls.

My 'sensible' guess is that there was only so much time to get all the recorded lines done.

My semi-WMG guess is that the gamedevs didn't want to attract a horde of crazy catgirl fans if they had an 'official' marriageable Khajit. Seriously.

MadCat221 Since: May, 2010
Sep 6th 2013 at 9:27:13 AM •••

Placing here for all the references throughout the Skyrim subpages I'm editing out: I asked Matt Grandstaff, the community manager at the official Bethesda Game Studios forum about just when Serana was put away. She was put away during the Second Era Interregnum, as per Word of God.

Source: http://forums.bethsoft.com/topic/1472746-when-serana-got-put-away/

Editing out all references to now verifiably inaccurate "Pre-Alessia" theories... Feel free to nix any I miss.

Edited by 216.99.32.42
cyclopsman Cyclopsman Since: May, 2011
Cyclopsman
Aug 29th 2012 at 11:04:24 PM •••

So, i've been looking, and i can't find it, even though it gets a passing glance on this Wiki. Supposedly, you can actually sequence break get a dragon shout before completing the Main Story line quest that unlocks it.

So, how? I mean, all you really need is a Dragon and a Word. Getting a Word is easy, but finding a dragon soul before you the quest at whiterun is pretty much impossible, isn't it? can anybody tell me how to do this? or at least link me to someone whose figured it out?

...not sure what to put here, really. Hide / Show Replies
Zaptech Since: Oct, 2010
Feb 20th 2013 at 6:01:21 PM •••

You can't. Dragons do not spawn at all until you complete Dragon Rising. They won't even appear on the dragon roosts until you've finished that quest.

TheAndyMac Since: Sep, 2010
Dec 2nd 2011 at 12:42:04 PM •••

I'm seeing some confusing statements about dragons, especially under Instant Awesome Just Add Dragons, which says the dragons encountered are lesser Aedric souls possessing Akaviri dragon skeletons. Is this ever mentioned in the game itself? And isn't it kind of Jossed by the appearance of Parthurnaax, a dragon from the old war that still survives?

Hide / Show Replies
BaronPraxis Since: Feb, 2010
Feb 8th 2012 at 1:38:16 PM •••

I have no idea where they're getting this crap from.

socks Since: Mar, 2013
Oct 26th 2012 at 8:04:12 PM •••

No. There's a popular theory that dragons are lesser et'ada, but I have no idea where the skeleton thing came from.

ijffdrie Since: Jan, 2010
Mar 2nd 2012 at 5:18:27 PM •••

This line:

The Dunmer are very Jewish when one looks at the lore and history, despite their British Accents.

I really can't think of anything the jewish and the dunmer have in common. There is no promised land, the messiah has already come and gone, there is no singular god, they're legendary assasins clad in bones, they have a connection to the moon and are slavers. Maybe the whole 'driven out of country and live in ghettos in other country' applies, but that is not exactly unique to the jewish. If no one objects, I will delete the entry.

Hide / Show Replies
jakyoku Since: May, 2011
Sep 9th 2012 at 1:47:52 PM •••

Not the religion; historically. They're pushed off into a ghetto where many of them develop their own racism and culture.

Let's eat, grandma! Let's eat grandma! Commas save lives.
socks Since: Mar, 2013
Oct 26th 2012 at 7:44:02 PM •••

There's more parallels than that. For example: -They were lead out of their homeland by a prophet named Veloth, who led them on an exodus to the promised land of morrowind. (i.e. Moses) -They're homeland was destroyed, which created a huge diaspora of displaced dunmer. -As you mentioned, they now live in ghettos and face a great deal of discrimination.

Ghilz Perpetually Confused Since: Jan, 2001
Perpetually Confused
Dec 2nd 2011 at 9:01:52 AM •••

On Alduin's Wall Where IS Red Mountain and the Shattering of the Staff of Chaos, listed in the Call Backs. Coz I don't see it.

Hide / Show Replies
BaronPraxis Since: Feb, 2010
Feb 7th 2012 at 12:01:10 PM •••

There's a man with a staff to the right of the guy in the center that might be the hero from Arena. The staff doesn't look much like the Staff of Chaos from Arena but I don't see any other staffs there. And I don't see Red Mountain but I can see Akulakhan right above that to the left of the Oblivion gate.

Lawyerdude Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 19th 2012 at 1:55:06 PM •••

It took a while to see, but I think Red Mountain is actually in the background between Akulakhan and the Oblivion symbol. You can see the straight lines marking the sides of the mountain, and then curled smoke rising from the top.

What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.
Sanmei Since: Sep, 2011
Jan 29th 2012 at 11:50:14 AM •••

Is "fus ro dah" pronounced more clearly in-game? Because I feel like the spelling should practically count as an Informed Attribute, judging by the 9001 meme videos on youtube which use the trailer audio. Ascended Meme has this being hollared like something out of Dragonball - "FUSSSSSS ROOOOOOO DAAAAAAAAH!" - yet every single video makes it sound more like "FUSDAH", and that's being generous. It's definitely NOT three syllables.

Hide / Show Replies
SailorEnlil Since: Oct, 2009
Feb 27th 2012 at 9:26:11 PM •••

To clarify, if you don't have all the three words of power of the Unrelenting Force shout yet (which you will get some time late in the main quest from one of the Greybeards), or if you use a weak version of the shout (by hitting the shout key quickly instead of holding it), you'll hear "FUSDAH". Use it at full power once you learn all the three words, and you hear "FUSSSSSS ROHDAHHHHHH!" This also applies to every shout.

For Love and Justice, I am Sailor Enlil! In the name of Lord Enlil, I shall punish you!
Lawyerdude Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 19th 2012 at 1:48:46 PM •••

The full Shout sounds more like Fuus... RODAH! Most Shouts, when you learn all three words tend to hold the first word a little longer, then pause, then Shout the last two words in quick succession.

What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.
Acebrock He/Him Since: Dec, 2009
He/Him
Dec 3rd 2011 at 12:28:12 AM •••

Since it's been added and removed twice now, I think we need consensus on whether the idea that The Silver Hand might be vampires based on some vague in-game evidence (specifically that you can find vampire dust on some of their corpses) can go on the main page or should be relegated to WMG. Personally I think that's enough to qulify the idea as more than a fan theory, but not enough to outright say that they are or aren't.

My troper wall Hide / Show Replies
Ghilz Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 3rd 2011 at 3:46:47 AM •••

Never found any Vampire Dust on their corpses and I am on my third playthrough with the Companions. Also they never use the vampire health drain ability (which Vampires often make liberal use of). Carrying vampire dust doesn't make one a vampire necessarily (Case and point, the player).

Lastly, there could be a simple In-Universe reason for them to carry vampire dust. It's one of the ingredients for "Cure Disease" and since some strains of Lycantropy, (like the ones from Daggerfall, and there's other references to Daggerfall-type Lycanthropy in the game like the re-appearance of Glenmoril witches and their ties to the cure) are communicable as a disease, them having liberal caches of the potion and its ingredients make sense.

Edited by Ghilz
KiTA Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 3rd 2011 at 4:45:56 AM •••

They carry random alchemy ingredients that cure disease. One of these is Vampire Dust.

RedViking Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 3rd 2011 at 10:18:22 AM •••

Plus it's not that far of a stretch to assume that The Silver Hand hunts vampires in addition to werewolves, which also explains why they have Vampire Dust. I once found Vampire Dust on a pile of ash in a locked cage in one of their strongholds, but even the implication of vampire prisoners is debatable since you don't actually see any locked up vampires as you do werewolves. Or, at least I never did.

Point being, the in-game evidence is vague at best and I don't think there's enough there to conclusively state that The Silver Hand is the vampire equivalent of The Companions. For that reason, it should be in WMG.

Edited by RedViking
RedViking Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 3rd 2011 at 10:18:22 AM •••

Plus it's not that far of a stretch to assume that The Silver Hand hunts vampires in addition to werewolves, which also explains why they have Vampire Dust. I once found Vampire Dust on a pile of ash in a locked cage in one of their strongholds, but even the implication of vampire prisoners is debatable since you don't actually see any locked up vampires as you do werewolves. Or, at least I never did.

Point being, the in-game evidence is vague at best and I don't think there's enough there to conclusively state that The Silver Hand is the vampire equivalent of The Companions. For that reason, it should be in WMG.

Edited by RedViking
Eacaraxe Since: Dec, 2010
Dec 4th 2011 at 8:24:26 PM •••

You cannot contract sanguinare vampiris (the Skyrim version of porphyric hemophilia, the disease that all vampires carry and can communicate to the PC, which turns them into a vampire) from Silver Hand members. Moreover, silver hand members can be encountered outdoors in daytime and are not significantly weaker than they would be at night or indoors. From that, it can be safely assumed silver hand members aren't vampires.

Dragon573 Since: Jun, 2016
Apr 22nd 2012 at 5:18:44 PM •••

Also, they show up if you use detect life. Vampires don't.

It's kind of funny. Sufficiently advanced stupidity is like sufficiently advanced science; eventually, you find something you can't solve.
BaronPraxis Since: Feb, 2010
Feb 8th 2012 at 1:36:51 PM •••

Is there really any difference? The PC is both a player and the hero.

Dragon573 Since: Jun, 2016
Apr 22nd 2012 at 5:16:15 PM •••

It's the difference between it being directed at the player and being directed at the player's character. It's a fourth wall thing.

It's kind of funny. Sufficiently advanced stupidity is like sufficiently advanced science; eventually, you find something you can't solve.
ChaoticQueen Since: Mar, 2011
Feb 11th 2012 at 12:22:51 PM •••

Why is Alduin's name such an important spoiler? It's not like it's a twist or something! It'd be like spoilering Tai Lung's name or Sephiroth's name or maybe Frieza's name!

Hide / Show Replies
EmperorSteele Since: May, 2009
Feb 11th 2012 at 12:35:18 PM •••

Probably because if you actually pay close attention, he's SUPPOSED to be dead and the fact that the World-Eater is alive is supposed to be a surprise... but if you don't read any books or listen to random people, then it's no big deal. It's just "oh, another dragon. Okay, when can I kill it?"

ijffdrie Since: Jan, 2010
Mar 27th 2012 at 1:53:12 PM •••

Though the surprise was already ruined for everyone who uses subtitles.

raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 17th 2011 at 10:55:40 AM •••

Are the constellations actual anthropomorphic personifications? I thought the idea that they govern the skills was closer to astrology than intelligent beings in control.

Hide / Show Replies
raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 18th 2011 at 6:51:44 AM •••

Wow, I was tired when I wrote that, no wonder it doesn't make sense.

What I meant was that under Anthropomorphic Personification it says that the skills are controlled by the constellations/ guardian nebula. I was under the impression this was a combination of astrology and finding constellations like the ancient Greeks did, but this is Tamriel, so they could be actual Anthropomorphic Personifications. Any info one way or another?

ijffdrie Since: Jan, 2010
Mar 2nd 2012 at 5:20:51 PM •••

Nope, they're little holes through oblivion that seep magic into the world of mortals.

iamnuff Since: Dec, 2010
Feb 1st 2012 at 5:29:59 PM •••

in the "dev team think of everything" entry it says

"Casting Calm or Courage on an NPC is a good way to grind your Illusion skill. However, try casting Calm on Colette at the College of Winterhold; her response will make you feel dirty."

I cant get it on my save because people level to your level when you first met them, and I meet Colette at about level 15, (calm only works to lvl 6-ish)

what exactly is the quote?

Hide / Show Replies
BaronPraxis Since: Feb, 2010
Feb 8th 2012 at 1:48:11 PM •••

"Stop that! I will not be violated by some...half-Septim magician!"

raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 21st 2011 at 4:40:45 PM •••

Author Existence Failure says on the trope page that it is trivia, and nothing in it mentions examples within works. Do the dwemer really fit under it, and if not, should we create a trope that is author existence failure in universe?

Hide / Show Replies
BaronPraxis Since: Feb, 2010
Feb 7th 2012 at 12:06:07 PM •••

How could the Dwemer fit under Author Existence Failure? They didn't create the universe, they just (probably) tried to recreate themselves and winked out of existence. Might qualify but I'd hesitate to include it.

Ghilz Perpetually Confused Since: Jan, 2001
Perpetually Confused
Dec 14th 2011 at 6:36:31 PM •••

I've removed the following twice:


  • Referenced by the fact that their ancestry is completely unique from every other race; they are from a Lost Continent which was destroyed by a series of natural disasters in ancient times. Therefore they share no connection whatsoever with any of the other human races (who are all descended from people who came from Atmora.)

This goes right under the line about the Redguards being based on Moorish people. How does ANY of this reference the Moors? Were they from a lost continent? No. Were they descended from another species? NO. How the HELL does this "refrence" them.

On top of that, it's natter.

Hide / Show Replies
BaronPraxis Since: Feb, 2010
Feb 7th 2012 at 12:04:39 PM •••

The Redguards? Well I can't say for sure that they were moors (if anything their culture seems more Arabic/Persian to me). But they were from a lost continent, Yokuda. And it was destroyed (in fact the Redguards hold themselves responsible). And since all other humans came from Atmora in the north and not Yokuda in the west, they are different from the other races of men (even though they are still considered man). http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Redguard Happy studying and do keep your temper in check.

Edited by BaronPraxis
gilead26 Since: Nov, 2011
Nov 16th 2011 at 5:12:34 PM •••

Where did the entry on the Altmer enslaving the Bosmer come from? The Bosmer are not enslaved, they formed the Aldmeri Dominion jointly with the Altmer.

Hide / Show Replies
raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 6th 2011 at 10:08:23 PM •••

"Formed jointly" at the end of a sword. The bosmer were basically conquered by the Thalmor. There's a good reason it's called the Aldmeri Dominion.

notmyleg Since: Dec, 1969
Dec 14th 2011 at 10:57:37 AM •••

I don't know if it is clear that the 4th Era Aldmeri dominion is the result of the Altmer (under Thalmor leadership) conquering the Bosmer (I don't think there is any question that the earlier Aldmeri Dominion conquered the Bosmer, but it fell long before the events of Skyrim).

I looked briefly through some of the lore and couldn't find anything. The name does not indicate anything. The Aldmeri dominion is not named for the High Elves (Altmer), but for the First/Elder Folk (Aldmer), from whom all "Mer" are descended. Granted, the Altmer are the descendants most similar to the Aldmer, but a union of all "Mer" people could reasonably be termed the Aldmeri Dominion whether formed by Altmer, Bosmer, or Dunmer.

raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 15th 2011 at 10:36:37 AM •••

According to the elder scrolls wiki, the Thalmor gained power during and after the oblivion crisis. The timeline for when exactly the seceded is unclear, but several years after they did, sympathizers in Valenwood overthrew the ruling Imperial administration, sparking a small war between the Dominion and its bosmer allies and the Empire and its bosmer allies. The Dominion itself existed before allying with Valenwood, it purged all resistance in Valenwood, and given what we know about hidden agents, its not unreasonable to think that it created the sympathizers. Additionally, there are no non-Altmer thalmor in skyrim as anything other than servants, and the seat of power was always in Summerset.

(I was referring to the Dominion part of Aldmeri Dominion, not the Aldmeri part.)

The original Aldmeri dominion was a joint alliance by the Bosmer and Altmer, so this may be where the confusion is coming from.

random1 Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 22nd 2012 at 6:56:22 PM •••

Is there any evidence that the Thalmor created the sympathizers in Valenwood or is that purely speculation on your part? While it seems clear that the Dominion started in Summerset, is there any reason to think that many Bosmer would not want to overthrow the Imperial control of Valenwood (i.e., the Imperial Dominion over mer and beast races)? There is a long history of dislike/distrust of Imperial domination (by those in Valenwood as well as many other parts of the Empire). It seems much more likely to me that many Bosmer in Valenwood would prefer to be allied with the Altmer than be a colony of the Empire, although I'm sure some in Valenwood would have preferred to remain allied with the Empire (just as some Nords prefer that).

Also, even if all those in Valenwood loved their Imperial overlords and wanted them to remain in control, that doesn't address the question of whether there's any evidence that the Bosmer are slaves/indentured servants of the Altmer. I have seen no evidence of that. That would show that Valenwood (and, presumably, Elsweyr) is essentially a colony of the Altmer, like it was a colony of Cyrodil before the Imperials were run out, not that they are slaves of the Altmer.

Is there good evidence that the Bosmer were enslaved by the Altmer, as the Elder Scrolls V Skyrim page claims? If not, shouldn't the page be changed?

Edited by random1
random1 Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 22nd 2012 at 7:17:26 PM •••

related Qs: the same paragraph on the page says re all Altmer: "Also, if you kill one of their kind, just one, even if he just tried to destroy the world, they'll put out a hit out on you." This is not true. You can kill Altmer who are not members of the Thalmor without any greater consequences than killing any other NPC. You can sometimes even kill Thalmor without triggering an Order of Execution. I've killed many and don't have an order against me. (Quote from UESP Wiki: The Thalmor may write an Order of Execution for the player if you act against them (though the exact trigger is unknown).) That sentence about the Altmer/Thalmor should be changed as well.

Later in the page, it says "The High Elves have formed their own Empire and aim for nothing less than conquering all of Tamriel and enslaving everyone else (they've already done so with the Khajiit)." Is there any evidence that the Altmer conquered the Khajiit? Is there any evidence that they've enslaved the Khajiit?

Edited by random1
BaronPraxis Since: Feb, 2010
Feb 7th 2012 at 11:56:52 AM •••

No there is not. What's supposed to have happened is the two moons, which the Khajiit consider very important, just disappeared. They came back later and the Aldmeri Dominion claimed responsibility for bringing them back and the Khajiit willingly joined.

Iaculus Since: May, 2010
Feb 6th 2012 at 2:24:06 PM •••

It was replaced by Death by Genre Savviness, which seems a more fitting trope.

What's precedent ever done for us?
McSomeguy Since: Dec, 2010
Nov 27th 2011 at 7:52:03 AM •••

So now the A God Am I entry claims that the idea of Akatosh resulted from a compromise between the descriptions of Alduin and Auriel. Can someone give a source for this, because I can't find one.

Hide / Show Replies
Ghilz Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 28th 2011 at 9:13:48 AM •••

Read "The Monomyth" and "Varieties of Faith in the Empire" Found in Morrowind. Akatosh / Auriel is one of two gods all religions on Tamriel (the other is Lorkhan)

Edited by Ghilz
McSomeguy Since: Dec, 2010
Nov 28th 2011 at 7:05:38 PM •••

Yeah, but the entry states that the Cyrodylic idea of Akatosh resulted from mixing the ideas of Alduin and Auriel, and those books say no such thing.

raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 6th 2011 at 10:12:00 PM •••

There's also "Alduin is Real" and I think there's one along the lines of "The Alduin/Akatosh Dichotomy". The second one supports the that viewpoint, while the first says they're different entities.

RandomWanderer Since: Jul, 2009
Dec 7th 2011 at 11:01:48 PM •••

As I asked above, is there any evidence beyond in-universe books stating that worship of Akatosh came from mixing Nordic Alduin and Mer Auriel? Because those books are notorious for being only partially reliable. When Alduin himself declares that he is the firstborn of Akatosh, and does so right before a battle in the tone of voice one would use when boasting rather than trying to downplay themselves, it seems pretty clear what the truth is. Paarthurnax told us the same thing independently, and while he's not exactly impartial, he's still a good alternate source of information.

To ask this more simply, is there any reason to doubt the stated words of people who would know the truth, if the only opposing evidence is from books that are notoriously unreliable?

LordInsane Since: Jun, 2009
Jan 8th 2012 at 12:54:07 PM •••

No, but a) the unreliability varies, b) it isn't so opposing as it seems. Firstborn does not necessarily mean son, not when the series has a precedent of complicated relations between avatars, mirror-twins and the like (indeed, one of MK's - and therefore of non-canon but not-quite-so-non-canon status - new texts refers to Alduin as aspect Ald to Aka-Tusk (implied to be Akatosh in a similar manner to Alkosh being Akatosh) and "Do not forget that it was Heaven itself that shed you from me").

As for which book is the source, Shezarr and the Divines is a source for the Eight Divines, as a whole, being a "well-researched synthesis of both pantheons, Nordic and Aldmeri", but its reliability can be argued against by the fact that it refers to the Aldmeri Dragon God of time as Akatosh. It seems the other source is... Kirkbridge, back when he was at Bethesda and not just a freelancer writing lore for Bethesda - it is from a longer version Where were you when the Dragon Broke that adds an intro that explains what the heck Corax was referring to he when spoke of the Selectives dancing on that tower, explaining the Middle Dawn as coming from an attempt by a group of religious radicals to remove those aspects of Imperial Akatosh (the Cyrodiilic idea of Akatosh, if not necessarily Borhamu/the Dragon idea of Akatosh) that indisputably was the Elven Auri-El.

raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 16th 2011 at 7:48:56 AM •••

This is more out of idle curiosity than intent, but do tropes found in the books in Skyrim go on the main page, and if not where do they go?

Hide / Show Replies
Ghilz Since: Jan, 2001
LordInsane Since: Jun, 2009
Jan 8th 2012 at 12:11:30 PM •••

Although it is late, they should probably not go on Skyrim's main page if they have been shared with more than other game in the series. Certainly, the ones that have been around since Daggerfall would fit better with the dedicated Tropes page for In-Game Elder Scrolls Books.

stickmeister0 Shamboozle! Since: Sep, 2009
Shamboozle!
Jan 6th 2012 at 11:30:58 AM •••

Removed YMMV Natter from the YMMV page, moved to discussion.

  • There are also those who are quite enamored that the buggy Gamebryo engine is finally gone.
    • The game actually still uses the Gamebyro engine, just one that was adjusted and improved to the point that "by the time we got through it all, it was clear the technology was new enough to give it its own name, The Creation Engine". Upon release, bug reports are still growing and growing.
    • It's a new engine. It's not like Gamebryo is the only video game engine that has bugs in it.
      • Bugs aren't the only thing showing that it is the same engine. The quote from Todd Howard above proves it is the same engine, just improved. In addition, nearly all mods for Oblivion transfer perfectly to Skyrim.
      • Put it this way: If it really is a brand new, built-from-scratch engine, then Bethsoft have spent an incredible amount of time and effort painstakingly reproducing Gamebryo's many shortcomings.
        • Gamebryo isn't a full "does everything" game engine — it's a middleware rendering engine. Bugs unrelated to graphics won't go away just because a game stops using Gamebryo.
  • And that the Oblivion-style level scaling isn't going to be used.
    • Then players hit level 30 and watched bandits and half-naked cultists annihilate groups of dragons and giants....then again though, compared to bandits jumping you wielding Daedric armour while you had steel....
    • To be fair, you do tend to outgrow most enemies, its just that there is always one person who will cause a little bit of trouble in the groups, and most of them dont really have the power to keep up with the DOVAHKIN.

This isn't a forum, okay?

raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 27th 2011 at 3:42:30 PM •••

How are the guardian stones the Artifact? They still fit the theme of the world, they've just been modified for a changing game.

TechnicianFry Since: Jan, 2011
Dec 27th 2011 at 1:33:58 PM •••

The famous memetic mutation is actually "I used to be an adventurer like you. Then I took an arrow in the knee."

Thexare Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 12th 2011 at 12:17:40 AM •••

Necromage (under Revive Kills Zombie) actually says all *spells* are more effective, not Restoration specifically. I'm not editing this yet, however, because I don't know for sure one way or the other.

It is under the Restoration tree, but there is precedent for perks affecting different skills - Heavy Armor has one that boosts hand-to-hand damage. Raising the issue for someone else to confirm.

Hide / Show Replies
TheGunsmith Since: Apr, 2011
Dec 23rd 2011 at 6:55:36 PM •••

Necromage boosts the damage that Destruction spells do to undead, but it doesn't affect Illusion spells or the paralyzing Alteration spells. And of course, it affects the Turn Undead spells in the Restoration tree.

TheSollerodFascist Since: Dec, 1969
Dec 9th 2011 at 8:05:48 AM •••

Just a minor bit of discussion here, I added a point for Bitch in Sheep's Clothing for Saadia from the "In My Time of Need" quest yesterday, which was later removed by Troper/Zaptech with the point, "Yes, they are trying to kill her. That method may be dragging her back for an execution, but they're still going to effectively kill her."

Any thoughts on this? Quest spoilers - The Alik'r claim that Saadia sold out some Hammerfell resistance to the Thalmor, being in the high position she was in to pull it off and benefit from it. When the resistance remained strong and found out (in comparison to just about everywhere else in Tamriel), she was accused of treason. When you meet her, she claims otherwise and acts as the hunted.

Maybe it's a subjective quest, I don't know. I thought she still played the part initially as far as I've read on the Wiki.

Hide / Show Replies
RedViking Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 9th 2011 at 6:38:53 PM •••

In this particular quest, Bitch in Sheep's Clothing is subjective. Personally, I think that she was lying and that she did do what she was being accused of, but it's important to remember that the information that's used against her on the talk pages of the elder scroll wikis are fan speculation because the game never tells you what the "correct" choice is. It is up to the player to decide who is telling the truth and, for all we know, she was innocent all along and the other guy is just very good at manipulating others.

RedViking Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 9th 2011 at 6:38:53 PM •••

In this particular quest, Bitch in Sheep's Clothing is subjective. Personally, I think that she was lying and that she did do what she was being accused of, but it's important to remember that the information that's used against her on the talk pages of the elder scroll wikis are fan speculation because the game never tells you what the "correct" choice is. It is up to the player to decide who is telling the truth and, for all we know, she was innocent all along and the other guy is just very good at manipulating others.

raithe Since: Jul, 2010
Dec 6th 2011 at 10:15:37 PM •••

Do the Stormcloaks really fit La Résistance? I know they are in rebellion, but the situation is closer to a real war rather than an underground movement fighting an oppressor. If they're La Resitance, so were the Americans in the Revolutionary War.

Ghilz Perpetually Confused Since: Jan, 2001
Perpetually Confused
Nov 25th 2011 at 6:15:59 AM •••

Removed the following from Road Cones:

  • All but confirmed by Word of God, as when you bring the Spirit of Lucien Lachance in the area, he'll comment on Sheogorath's listening skills.

You can't summon Lucien in Pelagius' mind. since all spells unequip and you can't equip them back till you left. And if already summoned, he's not teleported to Pelagius' mind with you.

Hide / Show Replies
McSomeguy Since: Dec, 2010
RandomWanderer Since: Jul, 2009
Nov 17th 2011 at 2:10:53 PM •••

For the A God Am I and Face Heel Turn entries, is there any evidence beyond in-universe books stating that worship of Akatosh came from mixing Nordic Alduin and Mer Auriel? Because those books are notorious for being only partially reliable. When Alduin himself declares that he is the firstborn of Akatosh, and does so right before a battle in the tone of voice one would use when boasting rather than trying to downplay themselves, it seems pretty clear what the truth is. Paarthurnax told us the same thing independently, and while he's not exactly impartial, he's still a good alternate source of information.

To ask this more simply, is there any reason to doubt the stated words of people who would know the truth, if the only opposing evidence is from books that are notoriously unreliable?

Edited by RandomWanderer Hide / Show Replies
McSomeguy Since: Dec, 2010
Nov 22nd 2011 at 1:13:44 PM •••

I came here to ask the same question when I noticed some trope entries calling Alduin the "northern aspect of Akatosh". The only book I found which described him as such was one that did so due to lacking evidence of Alduin being a separate entity from Akatosh, and that book was obviously written before the dragons returned. We have more than enough evidence to conclude that Alduin and Akatosh are not one and the same at all, so the entries should be changed.

Tahaneira Since: Oct, 2009
Nov 15th 2011 at 12:40:28 PM •••

Why do people keep spoilering Final Boss Preview? The game flat-out tells you that it's Alduin attacking, it's not a secret in any way. There isn't some big shocking reveal of "The dragon that tried to kill you was ALDUIN THE DRAGON-GOD!" *dramatic music* It just happens.

Hide / Show Replies
webrunner Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 22nd 2011 at 6:10:16 AM •••

If you look at him when he's close it still says Alduin in the hover text.

webrunner Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 22nd 2011 at 6:10:16 AM •••

If you look at him when he's close it still says Alduin in the hover text.

VR90 Since: Dec, 1969
Nov 21st 2011 at 1:23:46 AM •••

Regarding references to High King's age. They say he is a "child" but this is because he is very young relative to Ulfric who is well into middle age, having been a soldier 30 years ago during the Great War. Was it not noted that Jarl Elisif, his wife, is an adult? Anyway, point is is that Torygg was not some pre-teen or teen that Ulfric slaughtered. He was a young man.

Edited by VR90 Hide / Show Replies
thatguythere47 Since: Jul, 2010
Nov 21st 2011 at 6:22:58 AM •••

I always took "child king" to mean that he wasn't officially a man in nord culture. Maybe you need to kill a bear before they stop calling you boy.

You can actually meet him in sovengarde and he's no kid.

Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?
Darthvoorhees Since: Mar, 2010
Nov 13th 2011 at 4:53:27 PM •••

I have a question about the Dragon Shouts. If your character is a Nord does he shout "FUS-RO-DAH" like Dovakhiin does in the trailer?

I ask because my character is Imperial, and he shouts it differently. "Fuuus RO-DAH!" And seeing the video on Crowning Moment Of Funny shows a Khajiit which ALSO says it differently.

Hide / Show Replies
Bisected8 MOD (Primordial Chaos)
Nov 13th 2011 at 4:58:00 PM •••

All the character gender/race combinations have seperate voice files for their vocalisations.

TV Tropes's No. 1 bread themed lesbian. she/her, fae/faer
Darthvoorhees Since: Mar, 2010
Nov 14th 2011 at 3:22:36 AM •••

Yes, I know that after watching the video. But that's not the question I was asking. I wanted to know if a Nord make makes the same shout Dovakiin does in the trailer?

Scow2 Since: Jul, 2009
Nov 18th 2011 at 5:59:22 PM •••

As far as I can see, even the Nords say "Fuus... RO-DAH!"

Which annoys me. But I don't have a Nord character.

Top