Aquila89
Since: Jul, 2009
Nov 23rd 2014 at 1:48:52 AM
•••
What's the point of such a lengthy description of Nixon's political career? That's not why people come here. If people want to read about that on the Internet, they go to Wikipedia.
I think that without using citations, writing about such a controversial topic at length is a bad idea. In my opinion, the page should only give a brief, non-controversial summary of Nixon's political career and list his appearances in fiction.
Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap
MOD
(Edited uphill both ways)
Nov 23rd 2014 at 2:17:43 AM
•••
Whew. That is far too long. Yes, pare it down please.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Aquila89
Since: Jul, 2009
SeptimusHeap
MOD
(Edited uphill both ways)
Nov 24th 2014 at 6:49:41 AM
•••
You can ask here.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Aquila89
Since: Jul, 2009
In recent years, Nixon is apparently starting to get reassessed in a unique degree - in that Trump's activities and chaotic term have made Nixon look good and reasonable in comparison, even in the wrong he did. Should that be brought up in the page, or is the topic still too sensitive?
Edited by TheWildWestPyro