Follow TV Tropes
I'm gonna take out the list of war crimes, as the page is getting to long. We are not The Other Wiki and don't need to list them all. Instead, I'm going to put the link to a list of japanese war crimes on Wikipedia. It's more complete/detailed anyway.
I'm going to rewrite the last part of the page. Aside from reeking of butthurt and bitterness, it also features a lot of repetition and some questionable historical claims.
Note that Japan is still officially an Empire.
Adding insult to injury is the fact that in the post-war period, Japan actually benefited greatly from America and other western allies' anti-Asian sentiments. The soft touch that was used on the country during the occupation is sometimes excused as an attempt to avoid a repeat of the Treaty Of Versailles fiasco, but a more cynical interpretation is that Japan was insufficiently punished for its war crimes because most were committed against people the Allies barely even considered human, as well as the fact that they didn't want to risk further damage to a future ally in the oncoming struggle against the emerging Communist regimes in Asia. And while the later excesses of said regimes may vindicate this somewhat, it's still a serious moral lapse and is largely responsible for the country's cavalier attitude toward its past evils. As some historian put it, "the effects of absolving Hirohito (think of him like Japan's symbolic Adolf Hitler in WWII) forever distorted the meaning of the loss at the war".
Unlike Germany, which was divided into four Allied zones, post war Japan was totally under America's control. Douglas MacArthur was given a free hand and never instituted the kinds of programs that Germans were forced attend to confront the evil of Nazism.
Much like the infamous Operation Paperclip, many scientists and others who had committed atrocities such as experimenting on humans were allowed to escape punishment because they were considered by the Americans less of a threat and less morally reprehensible than Chairman Mao and his ilk.
While we would be loathe to say that all Japanese share the attitudes that lead to these tragedies, or that all of them are so dismissive of their impact, with Japanese products and culture becoming more and more mainstream throughout the globe it behooves us all to take a look back on this sad chapter in the nation's history and think about how it has affected the modern world...
Many important figures involved in japanese war crimes went unpunished, most notably the scientists of Unit 731 (in exchange for thier research material on biological weapons) and Emperor Hirohito. To prevent a second "Treaty of Versaillies", and because Japan was needed as an ally against the emerging communist regimes in Asia, America was very soft on Japan after the surrender. This and the lack of a Japanese counterpart of "Denazification" are largely responsible for the country's cavalier attitude toward its past crimes.
Note that Japan is still officially an Empire. Albeit In Name Only.
Yeah, that sounds resonable.
blackcat Moved the following here, because it is only about the second half of the period mentioned and makes no effort at neutrality.
Most notable in many parts of the world for war crimes committed during the Second World War and the era of militarism that preceded it, when Japanese military officers under the grip of a messianic, racist, and expanionist philosophy known as "The four corners of the World under one roof" took control of the Japanese government and systematically indoctrinated and brutalized their own population until resistance became unthinkable and such atrocities all too possible.
For Japan and China the war started in 1937, with the Second Sino-Japanese War. ("The Manchurian Incident, an older and highly euphemistic Japanese name for the latter, is considered highly offensive by the Chinese and is subject to Kotobagari). It merged into the whole mess that was World War Two and involved Imperial Japan committing some truly barbaric acts (consider bringing that Brain Bleach if you feel like Googling these stuff):
Ironically, Imperial Japan actually managed to achieve one of its major war aims as the war and its aftermath effectively ended European domination over Asia, though this neither excuses the atrocities or their true intention, which was to supplant European imperialism with their own. "Asia for Asians" may have been the slogan that Imperial Japan used throughout Asia but in practice it was more often interpreted as "Asia for Ourselves."
It should be noted while Germany as a nation apologized for the actions of the Nazis in Europe, Japan has never formally apologized to the Asian nations that were invaded by the Japanese armies. There has been "condolences" from a few prime ministers, but tend to be VERY vague (picture a German prime minister saying ".....and the economic recession will be resolved....oh yeah sorry about the past Israel!, moving along, housing problems seem..."), and actions from officials of the Japanese Government of visiting the Yasukuni Shrine (graveyard with convicted war criminals). It is unlikely this will ever happen, at least while anybody old enough to remember the war is still alive. As stated above, the Japanese are generally seen as unrepentant and distrusted by Asians that lived through Japanese occupation.
The Japanese are proud people, admitting such crimes against humanity would be a serious social sin of losing face, and as such, they tend to "whitewash" its past, with dubious education of Japan's mistakes in the past in schools (something non-existent in Germany, where a good chunk of schools get taught Nazi Germany a little too much) pretending little of interest happened, and this translates in the fact that many works of Anime or Japanese media rarely reference that past (which wouldn't be so nasty, if not for the fact that it happens even in many "historic" works). All this, of course, angers (with reason) Japan's neighbors to no end.
Note that Japan is still officially an Empire (the only one left on Earth).
Much like the infamous Operation Paperclip, many scientists and others who had committed atrocities such as experimenting on humans were allowed to escape punishment because they were considered by the Americans less of a threat and less morally reprehensible than Chairman Mao and his ilk. Even today Japan exports pharmaceuticals that were first tested on Chinese prisoners.
And I'm moving it back because "neutrality" doesn't mean you don't mention the bad things. Useful notes are supposed to be informative, and all of those really DID happen. The contributors didn't pull it out of their asses. Hiding all of it just because it isn't nice to read about is just as lacking in "neutrality" as showing only the bad stuff. The article has also been careful to say that Japan doesn't condone their past behavior, but just doesn't admit it. It's not saying the Japanese are evil or some such.
The Nazi Germany's page and the page on the History of the Cold War are just as critical.
However, yes, it is missing information on the first half, so I'll be putting that missing information up as well.
The article has also been careful to say that Japan doesn't condone their past behavior, but just doesn't admit it. It's not saying the Japanese are evil or some such.
Uh-huh. It's pretty much "JAPAN GOT OFF LIGHT, THEY'RE NOT WANTING TO ADMIT IT, OH YEAH THE ALLIES TREATED THEM NICELY BECAUSE THEY WERE RACIST AGAINST THE CHINESE".
in b4 getting accused of being a weeaboo.
See, it's a wild reaction like that that tends to put in question your claims of neutrality. You react with a knee-jerk "in b4 getting accused of being a weeaboo" even though I wasn't even using that term, nor did I accuse you of being a Japanese apologist.
If you really think that those are not neutral enough, then edit them into something more neutrally worded. Don't just delete the whole thing, including the list of the atrocities the Empire did do in WW 2, just because you're put off by it for whatever reason. It comes across as something like a denial of those atrocities' existence, which (I guarantee) will offend a hell of a lot more people. Especially people from the countries those atrocities occurred in.
As it stands, given your reply above, it really does look like you're frothing-in-the-mouth pissed because the article even mentioned those atrocities. Unless you do think they're ALL just made up and propaganda and never happened, in which case I will have a very real problem with your position. But I'm operating on the assumption that you're not going that far.
Hm, looking at the IP number, it seems you may not be the original troper who cut out the entire article. In which case, apologies for the confusion.
However, my point still stands. The cutting off of the entire article was unwarranted and smacks of sweeping uncomfortable history under the rug. Also, the dismissal that any criticism I have directed is just because I dismiss you as a "weeaboo" is a petty way of arguing and smacks of poisoning the well. Just because someone isn't exactly fond of parts of the history of a country doesn't make them completely bigoted against that country, you know.
A) Stop acting like you got attacked.
B) It can do without hyperbole. I'm not suggesting we use doublespeak and cover it up (I'm Filipino, and apparently, my grandfather almost got shoved into the Bataan Death March), but "behoove" makes me laugh.
I added a few changes.
1. I added that Yasukuni Shrine honors ALL dead soldiers in ALL wars Japan fought before and including WWII, as well as some civilians. The wording before made it seem that it was a shrine dedicated solely to war criminals, which obviously isn't. The Prime Ministers mentioned might have had close relatives and friends who are honored at the shrine, who might have died in past wars or did not commit any war crimes at all.
2. About the medicines first tested by Unit 731 on the Chinese still being produced today, is really unneeded and illogical. While it may be true (I've yet to see a source), do someone expect to see Japan stop producing medicines that, well, are medicines? It doesn't help that China and other Western countries are probably producing the same medicines and products anyway. So I removed that section.
Another few changes:
1. It mentioned that Japan was the "only Empire in existance." That is misleading (it's correct definition is a Constitutional Monarchy), and democratic "kingdoms" (similar political entities to Japan's system) still are numerous, with an obvious example of the United Kingdom and Spain.
2. I mentioned that Japan did repay the countries it occupied in WWII with extensive war reparations. I kept in their weak stance on admitting the crimes, but I felt it was needed that Japan did at least do something (even if it was largley in terms of assets and more or less forced by the SF treaty).
Community Showcase More