Adumbrodeus
Since: Aug, 2012
Apr 18th 2011 at 5:55:41 PM
•••
Not neutral at all, this article essentially comes off as a "take-that" to competitive play. If it's gonna be wholly negative it should involve usually a strategy to the detriment while not exploring other aspects that can be vital to high-level play (how a competitive player would describe it so it's negative to all).
Or make it neutral and note how in competitive play extensive use of effective strategies often result in counter strategies being found which ultimately expand the depth of the game. However, not everyone enjoys such play, resulting in a divide between the competitive crowd and the casual crowd.
Re example cut: Happened through this thread
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman