Is it possible to book in the right to list scrappy candidates for a work, similar to the Complete Monster page?
Felix Alexander EllisHow is Keiko from Yu Yu Hakusho a Scrappy? She's a beloved character from half of the fanbases as well as Yusuke and Keiko's relationship being considered one of the best in Anime/Manga. If anything she's more of a Base Breaking Character than a Scrappy.
Hide / Show RepliesIs this part no longer valid?
“While Hate Sink characters can overlap with The Scrappy, they have to be hated for different reasons than intended that detract from the work's enjoyability.”
I’m having someone argue that Tom’s owner in the Gene Deitch Tom and Jerry shorts doesn’t qualify because he’s not intended to be sympathetic. Are we now banning any intentionally unsympathetic characters, whether or not they’re considered to detract from the work’s enjoyability?
He/they | Mostly here on my free daysLinking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Redirect farming, started by nuclearneo577 on Mar 5th 2011 at 12:39:22 AM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanLinking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Does this include characters that were MEANT to be hated, or not?, started by nrjxll on Aug 7th 2011 at 4:33:43 AM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanLinking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Misused, started by GhostHouse on Oct 14th 2016 at 1:59:24 AM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanPrevious Trope Repair Shop thread: Misused, started by MsCC93 on Feb 18th 2013 at 4:40:51 PM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanPrevious Trope Repair Shop thread: Complaining, started by MsCC93 on May 25th 2013 at 5:56:52 PM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanPrevious Trope Repair Shop thread: Needs Help, started by CatcherInTheWry on May 13th 2020 at 6:12:35 PM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI just saw a user named CatcherInTheWry modified the image headline, as well as removed a paragraph describing various types of Scrappies. They cited the Rule of Cautious Editing Judgement as their reason for the former, but I do not believe that either of the edits in question were necessary. I do not understand how the original description ("The original Scrappy in his native environment. We would say 'Accept no substitutes', but asking you to accept him is perhaps asking too much.") could break the RoCEJ, while the paragraph that got removed I do not feel is arbitrary or useless enough to warrant getting deleted. Personally, I would like to have the deleted lines restored, but if anyone else has any thoughts, I am open to hearing them.
I was wondering if I could add the "Mineta hate" topic to the Broken Base page of My Hero Academia. Mineta obviously does have a big Scrappy status, but he also has fans that both admire his few awesome moments, and believe that some gags of his are Actually Pretty Funny. I also seen some that have gotten tired on the amount of hate he gets on certain sites like AO 3 and Tumblr (even on You Tube, one hate-filled rant video on Mineta by Dorkly had plenty of people defending the character.)
It seems to fulfill all 4 requirements, but I'm not sure if I should do it now, or wait and see if the manga will give Mineta a scene that will bring his popularity up; what do you guys think?
Edited by gizmo123473 Hide / Show RepliesPersonally, I'd say that Mineta qualifies as a Scrappy and belongs on the list. Remember, Scrappydom is very YMMV, and being listed as an example doesn't mean that everyone hates him, just a very large portion of the fan base.
Could we please create some consistent rules for which characters do or do not merit being listed as scrappies? Looking through these pages, it's clear that they've become an endless Edit War based on peoples' conflicting definitions of what makes one a true scrappy. Now, obviously, with scrappydom falling under YMMV territory, some of this was inevitable, but I feel like this page could use some basic rules to define what should and shouldn't be listed as examples. The Scrappy Cleanup thread provides some direction, but it has become overly long and even there, people don't seem to agree on what should and shouldn't be included.
For example, personally, I am of the belief that a Scrappy deserves to be listed even if they were Rescued from the Scrappy Heap, on account of the fact that if a character was a Scrappy for a significant portion of the fan base for a significant amount of time, then they do - in fact - qualify as an example of this trope that's worth documenting. I feel this is especially true in cases where the rescuing itself is subject to YMMV. Not everyone agrees with this, however, which is why I've been at odds with people who think that Suzaku Kururugi doesn't belong on the Scrappy list. Instead of continuing that particular edit war with them, I think it might be better if we could create a definitive page rule on the matter.
I'm just wondering, is there a good REASON groups of characters don't qualify as scrappies, only singular characters?
Hide / Show RepliesMy impression is that scrappiness can vary between individuals, and to be a Scrappy, they have to be stand out hated compared to the rest of the group. Ask the Scrappy Cleanup thread for more.
What's the equivalent trope for non-characters?
Hide / Show RepliesYou can look in the Scrappy Index to find the trope you're looking for.
All the neo-Paper Mario game and main Paper Mario YMMV pages had their Scrappy examples on the Toads removed for the reason that Scrappy only applied to individuals, not groups.
However, this removal only serves to obfuscate people's feelings of character annoyance on the Paper Toads, which is a disservice. Also, I feel the reason for the removals is way too technical/literal, and doesn't fit the spirit of the trope.
I checked the Scrappy Index, yet found nothing that really fits as a replacement trope (a group or species of disliked characters). So, is there such a trope that I glossed over, or should Scrappy just be added back into those pages?
Edited by DarkChirano Nothin' much, just cookin'.Exactly, how does one become a Scrappy, do we ask the fan-base about their opinion on the characters or do go on threads and Tumblr or what? I'm new to this by the way and I just want to know the right way to tell someone whether they are a Scrappy or not?
Hide / Show RepliesBasically, scrappies are added upon the perception that they have a large hatedom. You can ask here for specific characters.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanSo like if there was a blogsite of people hating that character, it would be a Scrappy
Wouldn't a successful Hate Sink be a Scrappy?
I got my political views from reddit and that's badNo, because a Hate Sink is intended and written to be hated, while The Scrappy is hated for unintentional reasons. A Hate Sink would have a harder time to qualify as The Scrappy (there's debate on this wiki if they would qualify at all) since they need reason for being hated independent of what they were written to be hated for.
So there's no hate-related YMMV for the likes of successful Hate Sinks and Complete Monsters short of Love to Hate if the Complete Monster monsters with good style, and Moral Event Horizon which deals more specifically with the act...
Is that going into cordoned off territory, though?
I got my political views from reddit and that's badNeed a bit more clarity in what you are talking about.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAlrighty then, I guess if a certain character is truly hated to all hell by every single sensibly-minded person the way the creators intended, then there wouldn't be any reaction YMMV entries on said character besides Complete Monster and Moral Event Horizon?
I got my political views from reddit and that's badThis trope definatly needs a namechange, I mean the current name is an insult to those who DO like Scrappy Doo!
Hide / Show RepliesThis trope is possibly the most ubiquitous of the lot, though. And changing it because some people do like Scrappy-Doo will just piss off the untold billions upon trillions upon hyperbolicwordthatendswithillions of people who really do hate the little git and everything about him. Like me. If you couldn't tell.
I agree with the above poster. I have to admit, this is the first time I've ever heard of anyone actually liking Scrappy. Scrappy fans are definitely not the majority.
This trope is catagorised as being subjective, so remember that you are free to disagree.
It's certainly wrong to assume that, just because a character has a huge hatedom, EVERYONE dislikes them, or even necessarily the significant majority of the fanbase. Scrappy Doo, it must be said, has garnered a big enough backlash for even the franchise to turn against him (Scrappy Doo seldom shows up in any contemporary Scooby Doo productions, but when he does, it's to be the object of ridicule - see the live action "Scooby Doo" film for the most extreme example), so he seems an appropriate enough trope namer. Which is not to suggest that the character doesn't have his fans, or people who feel ambivalent about him (this troper personally falls into the latter camp). In my view, Scrappy just happens to be a fashionable character to bash right now, irrespective of whether or not one even considers themselves to be a fan of Scooby Doo - people like to forget that, when he was first introduced, the show's waning ratings suddenly picked up. In the years that followed, HB definitely went overkill with the character, to the point where they even dropped the mystery solving element of Scooby Doo in favour of a cartoon consisting of nothing but chase scenes with Scooby and Scrappy (and actual ghosts, to boot), which I suspect accounts for a lot of the resentment. Perhaps it's unfair that Scrappy has been the object of so much hatred while the Great Gazoo, deemed as being the Flinstone's equivilent character, is all but forgotten (and, unlike Scrappy, Gazoo wasn't even all that popular to begin with - the Flinstones was cancelled soon after his arrival). Mark Evanier, who played a role in developing Scrappy has stated his belief that Scrappy haters are "few in number but loud in voice". But, regardless of whether or not Scrappy haters truly respresent the majority of the fanbase, and whether a lot of these haters actually despise him as much as they claim or are just following the fashion, Scrappy hatred has become a big enough phenomenon for even Scooby Doo itself to feel the need to take pot shots at him.
Even though I'm not a fan of Scrappy Doo, I have seen one or two other characters listed under this trope who I personally am rather fond of, and furthermore am covinced that, just because one troper and a few of their online friends might have had a grudge against them, they do not represent how the majority of the fanbase feels. Which goes back to what I said about this being subjective.
Edited by jjlattefiendWhy must you always give the hand to the MINORITY?
Edited by forrestchump I hope your happy, scumsuckers!Ya know it would be better to just call it The Hated instead of The Scrappy since he did have his fans
Darkness is The Power of LifeI never hated Scrappy as a kid, but I understand the concept. To all the posts above, I think the first guy was just riffing on the recent surge to make the wiki as politically correct and unbiased as can be. Changing this would be a major pain in the neck, as "The Scrappy" has already become a universally known term to tropers.
Yes, this trope needs a name change...mostly because I can think of someone from the Scooby-Doo universe who is even worse: Scooby-Dumb. Scrappy was a downright stroke of genius compared to him. Unfamiliar with Scooby-Dumb? Let me fill you in. He's a light blue version of the original Scooby-Doo, but with a red Beverly Hill Billies-style hat and he's literally too stupid to live...or even hide. Scooby has to guide him to obvious hiding spots a moron would see. On top of that, he contributed even less than Scrappy ever did (let that sink in for a whole).
Edited by WeirdRaptor "All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -GandalfNah, I don't think we should change it. I've actually heard the term used in other, more mainstream places. It'd be like renaming "Jumped the Shark."
No, I don't think this should be name-changed. Scrappy Doo is quite possibly the Most Triumphant Example so I think he makes a pefectly good Trope Namer.
Edited by ading I'm a Troper!!!A name change is better we could try The Hate Icon that would be way better and besides Scrappy did have his fans
Darkness is The Power of LifeI agree with forrestchump. I think I've seen 1 person say Scrappy Doo isn't the worst character ever made.
EDIT: Not to say that there aren't more. but they are, as forrestchump said, the minority. The definition of this trope is a character with a hatedom. and Scrappy Doo is definitely one of, if not the Most Triumphant Examples. So, I don't see why this needs a rename, especially if it's used in more mainstream places.
Edited by ading I'm a Troper!!!Eh, I like Scrappy. I saw him as a kid when reruns of that show were aired in my country in the 90s, and I liked him. I've watched those episodes again, and I just don't see how he's supposed to be "the worst character ever." At worst, to me, he can be a slightly bratty kid, but hey, he's a kid.
HOWEVER, as said above, the name's been genericized on this wiki that people understand what it is implicitly. Changing it just for a relatively minor annoyance—and I do find the whole assumption that everyone is supposed to hate him and something's wrong with you if you don't find him annoying—just seems too much like trying to enforce a change based on a minor pet peeve, which can also be annoying.
Edited by Malchus Yeah, that avatar's a 'Shop of my real face.If this trope means "a character everyone hates", it should be renamed "The Jar-Jar" or "The Umbridge"
The Scrappy doesn't always have to specifically refer to Scrappy-Doo. Scrappy can be used as a word that means "akin to scrap", and since "scrap" means "unused or unwanted leftovers", that means that a title like The Scrappy, when completely disconnected from Scooby-Doo, easily means "the character who is akin to scrap" which can easily be taken as "character people hate". It doesn't need a name change.
Please consider supporting my artwork on PatreonThe reader is very much supposed to hate Umbridge. The viewer isn't supposed to hate Jar-Jar.
I think this trope should be renamed because the one who decided to name it "The Scrappy" had Trope Namer Syndrome. We don't have any trope named The Kirby or The Megaman. (Note that I potholed them) This should be "Terrible as Scrap".
Edited by KirbyRiderI haven't seen whatever it is the trope namer comes from, but for ages I just assumed that it was about a character who was scrappy, as in dug out of the scrap heap/hated for being worthless like scrap.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.^This is actually a good hint to the name.
No, this won't be renamed. It has too many inbounds, and the reason why the image is "off-limits" was explicitly stated to be because it works just like the name does.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAnother Scrappy fan chiming in here... complete with disbelief at the hatedom. Heck, I remember when I was roped into watching the film with a friend... and I kept asking him where Scrappy was, and he kept approving of said character's supposed absence, and I kept believing he was joking (because that is the sort of person he is).... and then ... well... a very different Scrappy ended up the big bad, and I was so weirded out by it I just said "This is bullshit" and left the room.
Scrappy Doo was the only decent character in the whole of anything Scooby Doo related. Ok, Velma had a few fun moments, but those were inconsistent.
Edited by SotiCoto "Do what thou wilst shalt be the whole of the law." ~ Aleister CrowleyTerrible As Scrap. There. No more time for this trope to be named after a character
Try with one of these options:
- "Universally Hated Character"
- "Terrible As Scrap"
- "Hatedom Target"
- "The Hate Icon"
I suggest that Universally Hated Character is a perfect name for the trope.
Edited by 201.102.209.133 The Dragon is Here!I like "Hatedom Target". I always thought "The Scrappy" was someone who likes to fight a lot, and I believe it may give others that impression as well. So what if there are 'too many inbound targets'? Like they didn't have that issue when they renamed "The Wesley"? I agree that this trope needs renaming.
Edited by 71.86.144.194One more vote for renaming. In my mind "Scrappy" is an adjective referring to a character trait, not the name of a Scooby-Doo character, so that's confusing. I've been reading articles about a heroic band of main characters where one of them is "The Scrappy", and been assuming they were tough and eager to fight. This is a terrible name. (And furthermore, if I were to name a trope after Scrappy-Doo based on the description given in this article, I would choose "Unintentionally Hated Character".) Every article that you have to replace the name "The Scrappy" in is an article improved.
As for what to rename it. "Universally Hated Character" is pretty good. Although one might think that meant that all characters in-universe (as opposed to all fans) hated the character. Someone upthread suggested "Hatedom Magnet", which seems pretty good. "Hatedom Target" is maybe fine too.
I'll note that the Trope Repair Shop is the place for renaming proposals, not the wiki discussion pages.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanWhile I made a bad mistake, I think this trope should be called "Unintended Hate Sink."
Maybe it's just me, but I'm not sure if Villians should qualify or at least should have their own separate trope because while I understand why some of them are considered this "bad even for villain standards" to quote Lemony Snicket:
"I'm at a loss as to how to write a villain who doesn't do villainous things".
"Life's like a movie, write your own ending. Keep believing, keep pretending."-Jim HensonIt seems to me that many of the examples are saying that a character sucks, rather than saying that the fandom thinks they suck.
Hide / Show RepliesYeah, I've noticed this pattern as well. As I said elsewhere, articles about audience reception need to talk about the reception, not the reasons for such reception.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI've also noticed especially regarding Yukiteru Amano. Sure it's partially true, but it comes more across like Kousaka's "The Reason You Suck" Speech from the manga than the other entries
Edited by Sakubara "Life's like a movie, write your own ending. Keep believing, keep pretending."-Jim HensonI've seen this trope listed on YMMV pages to list examples of characters that a creator personally dislikes. Is the trope allowed to be used that way?
Hide / Show RepliesCouldn't Moneybags from the Spyro series qualify? I noticed that he wasn't listed, and he easily qualifies as one of my most hated video game characters, but I don't know if a lot of other people have the same sentiments.
Hide / Show RepliesIf that was the case Iris form Pokemon belongs here too. I've seen a lot of people post about how they don't like her. I know sum do but I've hated her since day one and have held a personal grudge against her character ever since she tried to catch Meowth and would love nothing more then to see Team Rocket steal and keep all her pokemon. she deadpans to much.
Edited by 76.7.211.225 Ture power is determination.That's a good one. To be honest, Scrappy was probably the only Scooby Doo character I didn't want dead.
Yeah same here, he's one of three Scrappy's that I'm a big fan of. The others being The Sentry(Marvel) and Shujinko(Mortal Kombat)
Something these 3 have in common, beside the letter 's', is that they're hated because they're "bad characters" right? Just objectively bad, and do you now why? Because no one's ever tried to write them in a way that doesn't make you want to punch a wall. That's a failure of writing to me, just keeping a character flat so that you can blame all the misfortune of the story on them. But I digress.
Edited by 50.13.110.34 Find the Light in the DarkI'd like to argue in favor of adding Enchilada from Nemu Nemu. He is an incredibly obnoxious left-field character that does not fit into the world of that comic, and his plots are nothing more than "zany" rogue adventures which have absolutely nothing to do with the slice-of-life nature of the comic. With this current storyline, he's turned into a Creator's Pet. Not a lot of people like him for that.
Questions about this trope and Hate Sink...
1: How old is Hate Sink? I don't recall ever seeing it before.
2: Do you think a cleanup and sorting is in order? More than a few characters I see labeled as scrappys seem to be deliberately intended by their creator to be despised (which Hate Sink is defined as and uses The Scrappy as a contrast).
Edited by 216.99.32.45 Hide / Show RepliesWe already attempted a cleanup. Fast Eddie disapproved of the decision to remove the examples.
Either a large-scale cleanup should be done, or all examples should be removed entirely. I see examples that really seem like some troper listing characters they personally dislike, but which aren't necessarily disliked by the larger audience. If we're going to have examples, we need a concrete definition, a threshold a character must meet to be a Scrappy.
Hate Sink is a trope which uses a character who intentionally is made for the purpose of Love to Hate in context of the story.
The Dragon is Here!Given how The Wesley has essentially been renamed Creator's Pet, should we consider renaming The Scrappy into something more generic and less specific to one work? I can't come up with a good name, though. Perhaps there are others smarter than me who could give it a try? Hate Sink already has a specific connotation, so that's out. Maybe the Unintended Hate Sink.... Hatedom Target?
Opinions? Ideas?
Hide / Show RepliesThere's a discussion about this at the bottom of the page. In short, it has loads of inbounds, the name is fairly descriptive, it's caught on outside the Wiki, and it's used absolutely everywhere here. It does have a number of alternative names; you can see them in the Related tab.
This happened because Tim had made a mistake.From the Bleach section;
"Kaname Tousen during his time as a Gotei 13 captain and Aizen's right-hand man, he's easily disliked by nearly everyone of the fanbase due to being blind, being a black man, and joining the bad guys for a stupid and hypocritical reason"
I'm not understanding the "being a black man" part, which is linked to Unfortunate Implications. Is it UI because he's a black man, even though he isn't at all stereotypical and his ethnicity is never acknowledged or made a part of his character beyond his appearance? Or is it UI because people hate him because he's black. I can't think of any other context in which that line works, but I'm not sure which is worse.
Hide / Show RepliesEither way, it's pulled for being a UI without citation. UI gets so rampantly overused it's not even funny.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I think this trope need a cleanup...the majority of the characters are just Base Breakers. The examples also need to be rewritten since some of them sound whiny. Also, it's kind of sad that if anyone even defends a scrappy, he or she gets personally attacked.
Hide / Show RepliesThere's a clean up thread https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13598973560A64980100&page=2#42 here.
Edited by MissKittenLike base breaker, I don't think this trope needs examples. Why? Because evey character can be a scrappy. For example, if you go on Youtube and look up top 10 worst Godzilla monsters. Virtually every monster in the series is disliked by at least one fan in the comments and videos. Besides people just use this trope (and other scrappy tropes) to complain about characters they dislike.
Shouldn't Glen Quagmire from Family Guy count? He has few fans (out side of anti-Brian groups). Comes out of nowhere at times just to make an unfunny rape joke (in clouding the infamous "Marge Simpson rape", that could easily be considered the worst joke ever made on family guy). And he even has an "anti" on devaintart
Hide / Show RepliesSeveral of my co-workers watch Family Guy almost exclusively FOR Glen Quagmire.
But then this trope is just a whole mess of YMMV...
"Do what thou wilst shalt be the whole of the law." ~ Aleister CrowleyI suppose so. I don't hate Quagmire. But he does have a strong and vocal hatedom.
Since trope names apparently can't be references to characters or series, I propose this trope get renamed "Hatedom Magnet." How about that?
(Hope to God nobody takes this suggestion seriously...)
Hide / Show RepliesWhen did it say you couldn't name a trope after a show or character?
Naming A Trope. Don't name a trope after a Character, or you've got Trope Namer Syndrome!
Am i the only one who noticed that half of the examples here are either main characters or the most popular characters in the show written by people who dislike them? I can think of a few examples: Sora, Ryoko Hakubi(her entry specifically reeks of Ron the Death Eater), almost every character in the Pokemon franchise, Spongebob and Patrick and various others. Now I know that most of these characters do have a hatedom, but none of them are that large. Shouldn't this be regulated?
Hide / Show RepliesI have and it pisses me off. This trope is infested with "This is my opinion but I going to claim lots of people say this" Seriously needs a cleanup
Are you sure that The Scrappy shouldn't be renamed to something like "Universally Hated Character"? I ask this because this trope seems to imply that this sort of character is not supposed to have any fans at all. But the thing is...we don't really know if there are hatedoms for a number of the listed characters or if only one person hates the character. That, and if the character does have some fans, then how can we say that the character is "universally" hated?
Oh, Equestria, we stand on guard for thee!What would it mean for this trope if Scrappy himself would, in one piece of media, get successfully rescued from his own heap? And his rescue did not get retconned out of future works for the sake of status quo?
Edited by DanMat6288 Hide / Show RepliesThey Changed It, Now It Sucks! ...basically.
"Do what thou wilst shalt be the whole of the law." ~ Aleister Crowleysigh, god it SUCKS being in the minority of guys who like Scrappy
Hide / Show RepliesIt must since you probably didn't enjoy the jokes about him in the first live action Scooby Doo.
Edited by hayleychaotixScrappy was the only consistently likeable character in the entire franchise. The everlasting cowardice of everybody else in the cast in the face of YET ANOTHER ordinary human in a monster costume pissed me off even when I was too young to know what being pissed off really was. And then Scrappy was introduced... and he was awesome... and I got even more annoyed at the other fetchers for constantly oppressing him.
That this trope is even named after him is yet another reason why I hate humanity.
"Do what thou wilst shalt be the whole of the law." ~ Aleister CrowleyIf the creators designed a character intentionally so that everyone would loath them... does that count as The Scrappy? Or is that another trope?
Hide / Show RepliesThat would be a case of They Plotted a Perfectly Good Waste, but yes, it still counts.
I'm a Troper!!!Might it be an idea to split the scrappy into two types - type 1s, who aren't supposed to be hated, and type 2s, who are. To use an example from A Song Of Ice And Fire (which I like):
type 1 scrappy: Darkstar - a failed attempt to introduce a character with previous Ensemble Dark Horse Oberyn Martell's energy, badassitude and charisma.
type 2 scrappy: Prince Joffrey - murders protagonist, utterly cruel, totally incompetent and stupendously arrogant.
Schild und Schwert der ParteiSince people in general only hated Scrappy after shows changed due to Scrappy's success to make them all about Scrappy, have them fight real monsters, and keep making Scrappy the hero, wouldn't he be more of an example of The Wesley despite being the Trope Namer since people only hated him being pushed on them and not so much the original concept of the character himself? I think the true Scrappy of the series would actually be Scooby-Dumb, who was nothing but The Load or even The Millstone, added nothing for fan appeal, and did little more than attract general fan annoyance, which is why he was dropped so quickly. But then again, The Scooby-Dumb isn't as easily recognizeable as The Scrappy, I guess, but Scooby-Dumb seems to fit the description more than Scrappy himself, who IMO is more of a Wesley.
Hmm... Because this trope have no relation with the character itself but yes relation with the reaction of the fans?
What about in-universe Scrappy characters, or those considered to be one by Word of God? If this is suddenly a subjective trope, then there needs to be a split off for non-subjective examples.
The Scrappy is an audience-reaction trope, so there can be no such thing as "Word of God" regarding it.
Now Bloggier than ever before!Well, there can be Word of God in the sense of "I am God and I really hate this character I created that kept showing up for no good reason". But that's not really canonical. That's just his opinion.
See you in the discussion pages.^^^ In-universe examples of subjective tropes go on the main page with a note that it's in-universe.
Edited by ading I'm a Troper!!!Maybe not the right place to say here, but how do you call a new introduced character that particually is only seen with certain members of the main cast, while with the others he hasn't any contact at all.
Example: Bob, Job, Rob, Mob are characters during seasons 1-4, season 5 introduces Slob. He only has contact with Bob and Job while he doesn't know that Rob and Mob even exist.
Does this trope already exist or not?
Hide / Show RepliesGo to the Lost and Found. It should be on the left side of the screen, you put descriptions in there to see if there's a trope for it.
Complete Monsters are meant to be hated (or at least they were, until trope decay forced Complete Monster into YMMV territory, but that's a debate for another time). The Scrappy is not meant to be hated. So I would like to say no, but since both are subjective tropes, the real answer is yes.
The Scrappy can be meant to be hated, though they usually aren't. And while a Complete Monster is probably going to be hated in the sense of "the audience can't wait for him to get defeated" (Unless they're a Draco in Leather Pants), I'm not sure they're prone to being hated in the "the audience wishes this character were never made to begin with" sense.
I'm a Troper!!!It does not really matter why they get hated. Regardless of whether or not the character is hated for legitimate or illegitmate reasons, regardless of whether or not it was intended or not, if they are widely hated, then they belong to this trope.
Edited by KSonikThis trope is not just a character who is hated, it is a character who has a hatedom. A "hatedom" is a fandom (for lack of a better term) dedicated to hating something. Are Complete Monsters really likely to be that? That is the question. (Actually I'm not reallly sure about a few of the entries, but this is just the one I asked about.)
I'm a Troper!!!I noticed Fanon Discontinuity subpages have a Darth Wiki look to them, all black and stuff. Is there a way to do that for The Scrappy subpages? Seems fitting.
I looked at the video game pages and some of the characters would fit in another category such as tier induced scrappy. In fact a lot of these scrappys should belong on a different scrappy page. Isn't that why we have subcategories?
Can terrible works with no fans have The Scrappy in them if that's the only character the audience hates despite it not being creator's intent?
Edited by artman40