Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / TheScrappy

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
artman40 Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 24th 2023 at 1:47:24 PM •••

Can terrible works with no fans have The Scrappy in them if that's the only character the audience hates despite it not being creator's intent?

Edited by artman40
VenomousSeal Mister Since: Jan, 2017
Mister
Jun 4th 2022 at 5:18:54 AM •••

Is it possible to book in the right to list scrappy candidates for a work, similar to the Complete Monster page?

Felix Alexander Ellis
KawhiMidoriya1 Browns fans Since: Apr, 2020
Browns fans
Dec 4th 2021 at 6:18:22 AM •••

How is Keiko from Yu Yu Hakusho a Scrappy? She's a beloved character from half of the fanbases as well as Yusuke and Keiko's relationship being considered one of the best in Anime/Manga. If anything she's more of a Base Breaking Character than a Scrappy.

Hide / Show Replies
StewieGriffin34 (Season 2)
Dec 14th 2021 at 5:21:31 AM •••

You could just edit it out...

He/they | Mostly here on my free days
StewieGriffin34 (Season 2)
Nov 17th 2021 at 4:12:38 AM •••

Is this part no longer valid?

“While Hate Sink characters can overlap with The Scrappy, they have to be hated for different reasons than intended that detract from the work's enjoyability.”

I’m having someone argue that Tom’s owner in the Gene Deitch Tom and Jerry shorts doesn’t qualify because he’s not intended to be sympathetic. Are we now banning any intentionally unsympathetic characters, whether or not they’re considered to detract from the work’s enjoyability?

He/they | Mostly here on my free days
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 3:17:41 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Redirect farming, started by nuclearneo577 on Mar 5th 2011 at 12:39:22 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 22nd 2021 at 10:41:53 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Does this include characters that were MEANT to be hated, or not?, started by nrjxll on Aug 7th 2011 at 4:33:43 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 21st 2021 at 9:00:51 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Misused, started by GhostHouse on Oct 14th 2016 at 1:59:24 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 11:18:38 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Misused, started by MsCC93 on Feb 18th 2013 at 4:40:51 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 11:11:01 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Complaining, started by MsCC93 on May 25th 2013 at 5:56:52 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 8:26:46 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Needs Help, started by CatcherInTheWry on May 13th 2020 at 6:12:35 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Blazing_Larvesta Blazing Larvesta Since: Jan, 2019
Blazing Larvesta
Jul 1st 2020 at 6:11:47 PM •••

I just saw a user named CatcherInTheWry modified the image headline, as well as removed a paragraph describing various types of Scrappies. They cited the Rule of Cautious Editing Judgement as their reason for the former, but I do not believe that either of the edits in question were necessary. I do not understand how the original description ("The original Scrappy in his native environment. We would say 'Accept no substitutes', but asking you to accept him is perhaps asking too much.") could break the RoCEJ, while the paragraph that got removed I do not feel is arbitrary or useless enough to warrant getting deleted. Personally, I would like to have the deleted lines restored, but if anyone else has any thoughts, I am open to hearing them.

gizmo123473 Since: Apr, 2017
Jan 24th 2019 at 6:02:39 AM •••

I was wondering if I could add the "Mineta hate" topic to the Broken Base page of My Hero Academia. Mineta obviously does have a big Scrappy status, but he also has fans that both admire his few awesome moments, and believe that some gags of his are Actually Pretty Funny. I also seen some that have gotten tired on the amount of hate he gets on certain sites like AO 3 and Tumblr (even on You Tube, one hate-filled rant video on Mineta by Dorkly had plenty of people defending the character.)

It seems to fulfill all 4 requirements, but I'm not sure if I should do it now, or wait and see if the manga will give Mineta a scene that will bring his popularity up; what do you guys think?

Edited by gizmo123473 Hide / Show Replies
Razor21792 Since: Feb, 2013
Feb 19th 2019 at 8:03:25 AM •••

Personally, I'd say that Mineta qualifies as a Scrappy and belongs on the list. Remember, Scrappydom is very YMMV, and being listed as an example doesn't mean that everyone hates him, just a very large portion of the fan base.

Razor21792 Since: Feb, 2013
Feb 19th 2019 at 8:01:18 AM •••

Could we please create some consistent rules for which characters do or do not merit being listed as scrappies? Looking through these pages, it's clear that they've become an endless Edit War based on peoples' conflicting definitions of what makes one a true scrappy. Now, obviously, with scrappydom falling under YMMV territory, some of this was inevitable, but I feel like this page could use some basic rules to define what should and shouldn't be listed as examples. The Scrappy Cleanup thread provides some direction, but it has become overly long and even there, people don't seem to agree on what should and shouldn't be included.

For example, personally, I am of the belief that a Scrappy deserves to be listed even if they were Rescued from the Scrappy Heap, on account of the fact that if a character was a Scrappy for a significant portion of the fan base for a significant amount of time, then they do - in fact - qualify as an example of this trope that's worth documenting. I feel this is especially true in cases where the rescuing itself is subject to YMMV. Not everyone agrees with this, however, which is why I've been at odds with people who think that Suzaku Kururugi doesn't belong on the Scrappy list. Instead of continuing that particular edit war with them, I think it might be better if we could create a definitive page rule on the matter.

MrMediaGuy2 Since: Jun, 2015
Dec 13th 2017 at 5:09:01 PM •••

I'm just wondering, is there a good REASON groups of characters don't qualify as scrappies, only singular characters?

Hide / Show Replies
Ferot_Dreadnaught Since: Mar, 2015
Dec 13th 2017 at 5:13:00 PM •••

My impression is that scrappiness can vary between individuals, and to be a Scrappy, they have to be stand out hated compared to the rest of the group. Ask the Scrappy Cleanup thread for more.

RickTommy Since: Jul, 2011
ADrago Since: Dec, 2015
Oct 29th 2017 at 11:58:36 PM •••

You can look in the Scrappy Index to find the trope you're looking for.

DarkChirano Since: May, 2013
Oct 26th 2017 at 5:06:40 PM •••

All the neo-Paper Mario game and main Paper Mario YMMV pages had their Scrappy examples on the Toads removed for the reason that Scrappy only applied to individuals, not groups.

However, this removal only serves to obfuscate people's feelings of character annoyance on the Paper Toads, which is a disservice. Also, I feel the reason for the removals is way too technical/literal, and doesn't fit the spirit of the trope.

I checked the Scrappy Index, yet found nothing that really fits as a replacement trope (a group or species of disliked characters). So, is there such a trope that I glossed over, or should Scrappy just be added back into those pages?

Edited by DarkChirano Nothin' much, just cookin'.
DinoJungle Since: Jan, 2015
Jan 7th 2015 at 5:49:23 PM •••

Exactly, how does one become a Scrappy, do we ask the fan-base about their opinion on the characters or do go on threads and Tumblr or what? I'm new to this by the way and I just want to know the right way to tell someone whether they are a Scrappy or not?

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Jan 8th 2015 at 4:37:53 AM •••

Basically, scrappies are added upon the perception that they have a large hatedom. You can ask here for specific characters.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
DinoJungle Since: Jan, 2015
Jan 8th 2015 at 12:50:23 PM •••

So like if there was a blogsite of people hating that character, it would be a Scrappy

manhandled Since: Feb, 2012
Jan 12th 2016 at 10:45:21 AM •••

Wouldn't a successful Hate Sink be a Scrappy?

I got my political views from reddit and that's bad
Ferot_Dreadnaught Since: Mar, 2015
Jan 12th 2016 at 10:57:07 AM •••

No, because a Hate Sink is intended and written to be hated, while The Scrappy is hated for unintentional reasons. A Hate Sink would have a harder time to qualify as The Scrappy (there's debate on this wiki if they would qualify at all) since they need reason for being hated independent of what they were written to be hated for.

manhandled Since: Feb, 2012
Feb 7th 2016 at 12:16:27 AM •••

So there's no hate-related YMMV for the likes of successful Hate Sinks and Complete Monsters short of Love to Hate if the Complete Monster monsters with good style, and Moral Event Horizon which deals more specifically with the act...

Is that going into cordoned off territory, though?

I got my political views from reddit and that's bad
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Feb 7th 2016 at 2:23:49 AM •••

Need a bit more clarity in what you are talking about.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
manhandled Since: Feb, 2012
Oct 4th 2017 at 12:35:32 PM •••

Alrighty then, I guess if a certain character is truly hated to all hell by every single sensibly-minded person the way the creators intended, then there wouldn't be any reaction YMMV entries on said character besides Complete Monster and Moral Event Horizon?

I got my political views from reddit and that's bad
Simpsonite Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 9th 2010 at 7:20:14 AM •••

This trope definatly needs a namechange, I mean the current name is an insult to those who DO like Scrappy Doo!

Hide / Show Replies
Be Since: Jan, 2001
Mar 16th 2010 at 7:42:41 AM •••

This trope is possibly the most ubiquitous of the lot, though. And changing it because some people do like Scrappy-Doo will just piss off the untold billions upon trillions upon hyperbolicwordthatendswithillions of people who really do hate the little git and everything about him. Like me. If you couldn't tell.

Seikai Since: Jan, 2001
Mar 16th 2010 at 10:06:14 AM •••

I agree with the above poster. I have to admit, this is the first time I've ever heard of anyone actually liking Scrappy. Scrappy fans are definitely not the majority.

jjlattefiend Since: Mar, 2010
Mar 24th 2010 at 3:29:16 AM •••

This trope is catagorised as being subjective, so remember that you are free to disagree.

It's certainly wrong to assume that, just because a character has a huge hatedom, EVERYONE dislikes them, or even necessarily the significant majority of the fanbase. Scrappy Doo, it must be said, has garnered a big enough backlash for even the franchise to turn against him (Scrappy Doo seldom shows up in any contemporary Scooby Doo productions, but when he does, it's to be the object of ridicule - see the live action "Scooby Doo" film for the most extreme example), so he seems an appropriate enough trope namer. Which is not to suggest that the character doesn't have his fans, or people who feel ambivalent about him (this troper personally falls into the latter camp). In my view, Scrappy just happens to be a fashionable character to bash right now, irrespective of whether or not one even considers themselves to be a fan of Scooby Doo - people like to forget that, when he was first introduced, the show's waning ratings suddenly picked up. In the years that followed, HB definitely went overkill with the character, to the point where they even dropped the mystery solving element of Scooby Doo in favour of a cartoon consisting of nothing but chase scenes with Scooby and Scrappy (and actual ghosts, to boot), which I suspect accounts for a lot of the resentment. Perhaps it's unfair that Scrappy has been the object of so much hatred while the Great Gazoo, deemed as being the Flinstone's equivilent character, is all but forgotten (and, unlike Scrappy, Gazoo wasn't even all that popular to begin with - the Flinstones was cancelled soon after his arrival). Mark Evanier, who played a role in developing Scrappy has stated his belief that Scrappy haters are "few in number but loud in voice". But, regardless of whether or not Scrappy haters truly respresent the majority of the fanbase, and whether a lot of these haters actually despise him as much as they claim or are just following the fashion, Scrappy hatred has become a big enough phenomenon for even Scooby Doo itself to feel the need to take pot shots at him.

Even though I'm not a fan of Scrappy Doo, I have seen one or two other characters listed under this trope who I personally am rather fond of, and furthermore am covinced that, just because one troper and a few of their online friends might have had a grudge against them, they do not represent how the majority of the fanbase feels. Which goes back to what I said about this being subjective.

Edited by jjlattefiend
forrestchump Since: Dec, 2009
Mar 31st 2010 at 10:00:05 AM •••

Why must you always give the hand to the MINORITY?

Edited by forrestchump I hope your happy, scumsuckers!
Iqbal Since: Nov, 2009
Oct 3rd 2010 at 6:19:32 PM •••

Ya know it would be better to just call it The Hated instead of The Scrappy since he did have his fans

Darkness is The Power of Life
Inferno232 Since: Dec, 1969
Oct 12th 2010 at 9:49:43 AM •••

I never hated Scrappy as a kid, but I understand the concept. To all the posts above, I think the first guy was just riffing on the recent surge to make the wiki as politically correct and unbiased as can be. Changing this would be a major pain in the neck, as "The Scrappy" has already become a universally known term to tropers.

WeirdRaptor Since: Jan, 2010
Nov 5th 2010 at 1:07:26 AM •••

Yes, this trope needs a name change...mostly because I can think of someone from the Scooby-Doo universe who is even worse: Scooby-Dumb. Scrappy was a downright stroke of genius compared to him. Unfamiliar with Scooby-Dumb? Let me fill you in. He's a light blue version of the original Scooby-Doo, but with a red Beverly Hill Billies-style hat and he's literally too stupid to live...or even hide. Scooby has to guide him to obvious hiding spots a moron would see. On top of that, he contributed even less than Scrappy ever did (let that sink in for a whole).

Edited by WeirdRaptor "All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -Gandalf
BNJC1 Since: Jun, 2009
Feb 13th 2011 at 5:56:21 AM •••

Nah, I don't think we should change it. I've actually heard the term used in other, more mainstream places. It'd be like renaming "Jumped the Shark."

ading Since: Jan, 2011
Mar 18th 2011 at 2:31:44 PM •••

No, I don't think this should be name-changed. Scrappy Doo is quite possibly the Most Triumphant Example so I think he makes a pefectly good Trope Namer.

Edited by ading I'm a Troper!!!
Iqbal Since: Nov, 2009
Mar 29th 2011 at 12:50:42 PM •••

A name change is better we could try The Hate Icon that would be way better and besides Scrappy did have his fans

Darkness is The Power of Life
ading Since: Jan, 2011
Apr 20th 2011 at 7:38:55 AM •••

I agree with forrestchump. I think I've seen 1 person say Scrappy Doo isn't the worst character ever made.

EDIT: Not to say that there aren't more. but they are, as forrestchump said, the minority. The definition of this trope is a character with a hatedom. and Scrappy Doo is definitely one of, if not the Most Triumphant Examples. So, I don't see why this needs a rename, especially if it's used in more mainstream places.

Edited by ading I'm a Troper!!!
Malchus Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 20th 2011 at 4:35:15 AM •••

Eh, I like Scrappy. I saw him as a kid when reruns of that show were aired in my country in the 90s, and I liked him. I've watched those episodes again, and I just don't see how he's supposed to be "the worst character ever." At worst, to me, he can be a slightly bratty kid, but hey, he's a kid.

HOWEVER, as said above, the name's been genericized on this wiki that people understand what it is implicitly. Changing it just for a relatively minor annoyance—and I do find the whole assumption that everyone is supposed to hate him and something's wrong with you if you don't find him annoying—just seems too much like trying to enforce a change based on a minor pet peeve, which can also be annoying.

Edited by Malchus Yeah, that avatar's a 'Shop of my real face.
rt2012 Since: Aug, 2011
Mar 20th 2012 at 10:52:14 AM •••

If this trope means "a character everyone hates", it should be renamed "The Jar-Jar" or "The Umbridge"

CalamityJane Since: Mar, 2010
Apr 30th 2012 at 4:53:43 PM •••

The Scrappy doesn't always have to specifically refer to Scrappy-Doo. Scrappy can be used as a word that means "akin to scrap", and since "scrap" means "unused or unwanted leftovers", that means that a title like The Scrappy, when completely disconnected from Scooby-Doo, easily means "the character who is akin to scrap" which can easily be taken as "character people hate". It doesn't need a name change.

Please consider supporting my artwork on Patreon
David7204 Since: Apr, 2011
Apr 30th 2012 at 5:02:50 PM •••

The reader is very much supposed to hate Umbridge. The viewer isn't supposed to hate Jar-Jar.

KirbyRider Since: Nov, 2011
May 9th 2012 at 5:21:57 PM •••

I think this trope should be renamed because the one who decided to name it "The Scrappy" had Trope Namer Syndrome. We don't have any trope named The Kirby or The Megaman. (Note that I potholed them) This should be "Terrible as Scrap".

Edited by KirbyRider
Telcontar MOD Since: Feb, 2012
May 10th 2012 at 3:47:20 AM •••

I haven't seen whatever it is the trope namer comes from, but for ages I just assumed that it was about a character who was scrappy, as in dug out of the scrap heap/hated for being worthless like scrap.

That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
May 10th 2012 at 4:53:55 AM •••

^This is actually a good hint to the name.

No, this won't be renamed. It has too many inbounds, and the reason why the image is "off-limits" was explicitly stated to be because it works just like the name does.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SotiCoto Since: Apr, 2009
Jun 27th 2012 at 7:14:34 AM •••

Another Scrappy fan chiming in here... complete with disbelief at the hatedom. Heck, I remember when I was roped into watching the film with a friend... and I kept asking him where Scrappy was, and he kept approving of said character's supposed absence, and I kept believing he was joking (because that is the sort of person he is).... and then ... well... a very different Scrappy ended up the big bad, and I was so weirded out by it I just said "This is bullshit" and left the room.

Scrappy Doo was the only decent character in the whole of anything Scooby Doo related. Ok, Velma had a few fun moments, but those were inconsistent.

Edited by SotiCoto "Do what thou wilst shalt be the whole of the law." ~ Aleister Crowley
KirbyRider Since: Nov, 2011
Aug 14th 2012 at 11:14:02 AM •••

Terrible As Scrap. There. No more time for this trope to be named after a character

Dragon-Kid Since: Sep, 2013
Oct 28th 2013 at 6:44:45 PM •••

Try with one of these options:

  • "Universally Hated Character"
  • "Terrible As Scrap"
  • "Hatedom Target"
  • "The Hate Icon"

I suggest that Universally Hated Character is a perfect name for the trope.

Edited by 201.102.209.133 The Dragon is Here!
Confession0791 Since: Apr, 2011
Dec 8th 2013 at 12:45:47 PM •••

I like "Hatedom Target". I always thought "The Scrappy" was someone who likes to fight a lot, and I believe it may give others that impression as well. So what if there are 'too many inbound targets'? Like they didn't have that issue when they renamed "The Wesley"? I agree that this trope needs renaming.

Edited by 71.86.144.194
nnubnubnub Since: Apr, 2012
Feb 17th 2014 at 11:48:35 PM •••

One more vote for renaming. In my mind "Scrappy" is an adjective referring to a character trait, not the name of a Scooby-Doo character, so that's confusing. I've been reading articles about a heroic band of main characters where one of them is "The Scrappy", and been assuming they were tough and eager to fight. This is a terrible name. (And furthermore, if I were to name a trope after Scrappy-Doo based on the description given in this article, I would choose "Unintentionally Hated Character".) Every article that you have to replace the name "The Scrappy" in is an article improved.

As for what to rename it. "Universally Hated Character" is pretty good. Although one might think that meant that all characters in-universe (as opposed to all fans) hated the character. Someone upthread suggested "Hatedom Magnet", which seems pretty good. "Hatedom Target" is maybe fine too.

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Feb 18th 2014 at 7:45:19 AM •••

I'll note that the Trope Repair Shop is the place for renaming proposals, not the wiki discussion pages.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
MsCC93 Since: May, 2012
Feb 18th 2014 at 9:11:26 AM •••

While I made a bad mistake, I think this trope should be called "Unintended Hate Sink."

Sakubara Since: Jul, 2015
May 6th 2017 at 3:01:32 PM •••

Maybe it's just me, but I'm not sure if Villians should qualify or at least should have their own separate trope because while I understand why some of them are considered this "bad even for villain standards" to quote Lemony Snicket:

"I'm at a loss as to how to write a villain who doesn't do villainous things".

"Life's like a movie, write your own ending. Keep believing, keep pretending."-Jim Henson
SWFMax Since: Apr, 2014
Dec 11th 2014 at 3:15:41 PM •••

It seems to me that many of the examples are saying that a character sucks, rather than saying that the fandom thinks they suck.

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Dec 12th 2014 at 12:34:47 AM •••

Yeah, I've noticed this pattern as well. As I said elsewhere, articles about audience reception need to talk about the reception, not the reasons for such reception.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Sakubara Since: Jul, 2015
May 6th 2017 at 2:55:51 PM •••

I've also noticed especially regarding Yukiteru Amano. Sure it's partially true, but it comes more across like Kousaka's "The Reason You Suck" Speech from the manga than the other entries

Edited by Sakubara "Life's like a movie, write your own ending. Keep believing, keep pretending."-Jim Henson
ADrago Since: Dec, 2015
Nov 6th 2016 at 1:24:23 AM •••

I've seen this trope listed on YMMV pages to list examples of characters that a creator personally dislikes. Is the trope allowed to be used that way?

Hide / Show Replies
Nithael Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 6th 2016 at 1:25:07 AM •••

No, this trope is only for fan reactions.

TheMartianGeek1 Since: Apr, 2012
Jun 4th 2012 at 11:01:03 AM •••

Couldn't Moneybags from the Spyro series qualify? I noticed that he wasn't listed, and he easily qualifies as one of my most hated video game characters, but I don't know if a lot of other people have the same sentiments.

Hide / Show Replies
generalmorshu Since: Aug, 2012
Aug 10th 2012 at 3:32:32 PM •••

This trope isn't for opinions you know

Rocketseeker Since: May, 2014
Jun 13th 2014 at 8:35:38 PM •••

If that was the case Iris form Pokemon belongs here too. I've seen a lot of people post about how they don't like her. I know sum do but I've hated her since day one and have held a personal grudge against her character ever since she tried to catch Meowth and would love nothing more then to see Team Rocket steal and keep all her pokemon. she deadpans to much.

Edited by 76.7.211.225 Ture power is determination.
Codafett Knows-Many-Things Since: Dec, 2013
Knows-Many-Things
Dec 23rd 2013 at 11:29:51 AM •••

What do you call the people who like The Scrappy?

Find the Light in the Dark Hide / Show Replies
Spritle101 Since: Apr, 2013
Dec 26th 2013 at 12:15:36 PM •••

That's a good one. To be honest, Scrappy was probably the only Scooby Doo character I didn't want dead.

Codafett Since: Dec, 2013
Dec 27th 2013 at 11:02:17 AM •••

Yeah same here, he's one of three Scrappy's that I'm a big fan of. The others being The Sentry(Marvel) and Shujinko(Mortal Kombat)

Something these 3 have in common, beside the letter 's', is that they're hated because they're "bad characters" right? Just objectively bad, and do you now why? Because no one's ever tried to write them in a way that doesn't make you want to punch a wall. That's a failure of writing to me, just keeping a character flat so that you can blame all the misfortune of the story on them. But I digress.

Edited by 50.13.110.34 Find the Light in the Dark
brokenwit They call me...Ze Since: Jan, 2001
They call me...Ze
Nov 25th 2013 at 1:07:46 AM •••

I'd like to argue in favor of adding Enchilada from Nemu Nemu. He is an incredibly obnoxious left-field character that does not fit into the world of that comic, and his plots are nothing more than "zany" rogue adventures which have absolutely nothing to do with the slice-of-life nature of the comic. With this current storyline, he's turned into a Creator's Pet. Not a lot of people like him for that.

MadCat221 Since: May, 2010
Jun 17th 2013 at 4:24:00 PM •••

Questions about this trope and Hate Sink...

1: How old is Hate Sink? I don't recall ever seeing it before.

2: Do you think a cleanup and sorting is in order? More than a few characters I see labeled as scrappys seem to be deliberately intended by their creator to be despised (which Hate Sink is defined as and uses The Scrappy as a contrast).

Edited by 216.99.32.45 Hide / Show Replies
MsCC93 Since: May, 2012
Jun 17th 2013 at 7:09:13 PM •••

We already attempted a cleanup. Fast Eddie disapproved of the decision to remove the examples.

ShorinBJ Since: Nov, 2011
Jul 13th 2013 at 2:31:10 PM •••

Either a large-scale cleanup should be done, or all examples should be removed entirely. I see examples that really seem like some troper listing characters they personally dislike, but which aren't necessarily disliked by the larger audience. If we're going to have examples, we need a concrete definition, a threshold a character must meet to be a Scrappy.

MsCC93 Since: May, 2012
Dragon-Kid Since: Sep, 2013
Oct 28th 2013 at 6:42:10 PM •••

Hate Sink is a trope which uses a character who intentionally is made for the purpose of Love to Hate in context of the story.

The Dragon is Here!
Randolpho Since: Nov, 2011
Jul 9th 2013 at 9:39:43 AM •••

Given how The Wesley has essentially been renamed Creator's Pet, should we consider renaming The Scrappy into something more generic and less specific to one work? I can't come up with a good name, though. Perhaps there are others smarter than me who could give it a try? Hate Sink already has a specific connotation, so that's out. Maybe the Unintended Hate Sink.... Hatedom Target?

Opinions? Ideas?

Hide / Show Replies
Whitecroc Since: Dec, 2010
Aug 13th 2013 at 2:55:23 AM •••

There's a discussion about this at the bottom of the page. In short, it has loads of inbounds, the name is fairly descriptive, it's caught on outside the Wiki, and it's used absolutely everywhere here. It does have a number of alternative names; you can see them in the Related tab.

This happened because Tim had made a mistake.
Gravityman Thundersquatch J. Argyle Since: Apr, 2010
Thundersquatch J. Argyle
May 26th 2013 at 2:00:44 AM •••

From the Bleach section;

"Kaname Tousen during his time as a Gotei 13 captain and Aizen's right-hand man, he's easily disliked by nearly everyone of the fanbase due to being blind, being a black man, and joining the bad guys for a stupid and hypocritical reason"

I'm not understanding the "being a black man" part, which is linked to Unfortunate Implications. Is it UI because he's a black man, even though he isn't at all stereotypical and his ethnicity is never acknowledged or made a part of his character beyond his appearance? Or is it UI because people hate him because he's black. I can't think of any other context in which that line works, but I'm not sure which is worse.

Hide / Show Replies
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
May 27th 2013 at 10:10:00 AM •••

Either way, it's pulled for being a UI without citation. UI gets so rampantly overused it's not even funny.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
MsCC93 Since: May, 2012
Feb 17th 2013 at 5:30:53 PM •••

I think this trope need a cleanup...the majority of the characters are just Base Breakers. The examples also need to be rewritten since some of them sound whiny. Also, it's kind of sad that if anyone even defends a scrappy, he or she gets personally attacked.

Hide / Show Replies
generalmorshu Since: Aug, 2012
Nov 13th 2012 at 2:38:51 PM •••

Like base breaker, I don't think this trope needs examples. Why? Because evey character can be a scrappy. For example, if you go on Youtube and look up top 10 worst Godzilla monsters. Virtually every monster in the series is disliked by at least one fan in the comments and videos. Besides people just use this trope (and other scrappy tropes) to complain about characters they dislike.

kalpal Since: May, 2012
Jun 10th 2012 at 8:22:37 PM •••

Shouldn't Glen Quagmire from Family Guy count? He has few fans (out side of anti-Brian groups). Comes out of nowhere at times just to make an unfunny rape joke (in clouding the infamous "Marge Simpson rape", that could easily be considered the worst joke ever made on family guy). And he even has an "anti" on devaintart

Hide / Show Replies
SotiCoto Since: Apr, 2009
Jun 27th 2012 at 7:05:55 AM •••

Several of my co-workers watch Family Guy almost exclusively FOR Glen Quagmire.

But then this trope is just a whole mess of YMMV...

"Do what thou wilst shalt be the whole of the law." ~ Aleister Crowley
generalmorshu Since: Aug, 2012
Nov 13th 2012 at 2:34:58 PM •••

I suppose so. I don't hate Quagmire. But he does have a strong and vocal hatedom.

MsCC93 Since: May, 2012
ManwiththePlan Since: Dec, 2009
Nov 30th 2011 at 10:38:48 AM •••

Since trope names apparently can't be references to characters or series, I propose this trope get renamed "Hatedom Magnet." How about that?

(Hope to God nobody takes this suggestion seriously...)

Hide / Show Replies
MrDeath Since: Aug, 2009
Nov 30th 2011 at 11:29:26 AM •••

Passive aggressive griping isn't going to help, you know.

generalmorshu Since: Aug, 2012
Aug 10th 2012 at 3:29:52 PM •••

When did it say you couldn't name a trope after a show or character?

KirbyRider Since: Nov, 2011
Aug 14th 2012 at 11:20:53 AM •••

Naming A Trope. Don't name a trope after a Character, or you've got Trope Namer Syndrome!

azraelfinalstar Since: Nov, 2010
Nov 3rd 2011 at 10:08:00 PM •••

Am i the only one who noticed that half of the examples here are either main characters or the most popular characters in the show written by people who dislike them? I can think of a few examples: Sora, Ryoko Hakubi(her entry specifically reeks of Ron the Death Eater), almost every character in the Pokemon franchise, Spongebob and Patrick and various others. Now I know that most of these characters do have a hatedom, but none of them are that large. Shouldn't this be regulated?

Hide / Show Replies
generalmorshu Since: Aug, 2012
Aug 10th 2012 at 3:31:33 PM •••

I have and it pisses me off. This trope is infested with "This is my opinion but I going to claim lots of people say this" Seriously needs a cleanup

TiggersAreGreat Since: Mar, 2011
Jul 10th 2012 at 12:47:17 PM •••

Are you sure that The Scrappy shouldn't be renamed to something like "Universally Hated Character"? I ask this because this trope seems to imply that this sort of character is not supposed to have any fans at all. But the thing is...we don't really know if there are hatedoms for a number of the listed characters or if only one person hates the character. That, and if the character does have some fans, then how can we say that the character is "universally" hated?

Oh, Equestria, we stand on guard for thee!
DanMat6288 Since: Jul, 2009
Dec 3rd 2010 at 7:57:40 PM •••

What would it mean for this trope if Scrappy himself would, in one piece of media, get successfully rescued from his own heap? And his rescue did not get retconned out of future works for the sake of status quo?

Edited by DanMat6288 Hide / Show Replies
SotiCoto Since: Apr, 2009
Jun 27th 2012 at 7:11:21 AM •••

They Changed It, Now It Sucks! ...basically.

"Do what thou wilst shalt be the whole of the law." ~ Aleister Crowley
shadowii Since: Dec, 1969
May 25th 2011 at 5:03:26 PM •••

sigh, god it SUCKS being in the minority of guys who like Scrappy

Hide / Show Replies
hayleychaotix Since: Mar, 2011
Jul 19th 2011 at 2:15:32 PM •••

It must since you probably didn't enjoy the jokes about him in the first live action Scooby Doo.

Edited by hayleychaotix
SotiCoto Since: Apr, 2009
Jun 27th 2012 at 7:10:03 AM •••

Scrappy was the only consistently likeable character in the entire franchise. The everlasting cowardice of everybody else in the cast in the face of YET ANOTHER ordinary human in a monster costume pissed me off even when I was too young to know what being pissed off really was. And then Scrappy was introduced... and he was awesome... and I got even more annoyed at the other fetchers for constantly oppressing him.

That this trope is even named after him is yet another reason why I hate humanity.

"Do what thou wilst shalt be the whole of the law." ~ Aleister Crowley
Keshia Since: Apr, 2010
Feb 28th 2011 at 11:25:39 PM •••

If the creators designed a character intentionally so that everyone would loath them... does that count as The Scrappy? Or is that another trope?

Hide / Show Replies
ading Since: Jan, 2011
Achaemenid Since: Dec, 2011
Mar 14th 2012 at 2:13:19 AM •••

Might it be an idea to split the scrappy into two types - type 1s, who aren't supposed to be hated, and type 2s, who are. To use an example from A Song Of Ice And Fire (which I like):

type 1 scrappy: Darkstar - a failed attempt to introduce a character with previous Ensemble Dark Horse Oberyn Martell's energy, badassitude and charisma.

type 2 scrappy: Prince Joffrey - murders protagonist, utterly cruel, totally incompetent and stupendously arrogant.

Schild und Schwert der Partei
AltoonaMan Since: Feb, 2011
Dec 25th 2011 at 3:03:46 PM •••

Since people in general only hated Scrappy after shows changed due to Scrappy's success to make them all about Scrappy, have them fight real monsters, and keep making Scrappy the hero, wouldn't he be more of an example of The Wesley despite being the Trope Namer since people only hated him being pushed on them and not so much the original concept of the character himself? I think the true Scrappy of the series would actually be Scooby-Dumb, who was nothing but The Load or even The Millstone, added nothing for fan appeal, and did little more than attract general fan annoyance, which is why he was dropped so quickly. But then again, The Scooby-Dumb isn't as easily recognizeable as The Scrappy, I guess, but Scooby-Dumb seems to fit the description more than Scrappy himself, who IMO is more of a Wesley.

KSonik Since: Jan, 2015
Jul 31st 2010 at 3:46:46 PM •••

why is there an subjective banner?

Edited by KSonik Hide / Show Replies
MagBas Since: Jun, 2009
Oct 3rd 2010 at 6:34:55 PM •••

Hmm... Because this trope have no relation with the character itself but yes relation with the reaction of the fans?

Inferno232 Since: Dec, 1969
Oct 12th 2010 at 9:54:46 AM •••

What about in-universe Scrappy characters, or those considered to be one by Word of God? If this is suddenly a subjective trope, then there needs to be a split off for non-subjective examples.

muninn Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 29th 2010 at 1:25:32 PM •••

The Scrappy is an audience-reaction trope, so there can be no such thing as "Word of God" regarding it.

Now Bloggier than ever before!
SomeGuy Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 30th 2010 at 9:59:52 AM •••

Well, there can be Word of God in the sense of "I am God and I really hate this character I created that kept showing up for no good reason". But that's not really canonical. That's just his opinion.

See you in the discussion pages.
ading Since: Jan, 2011
Aug 7th 2011 at 4:26:08 AM •••

^^^ In-universe examples of subjective tropes go on the main page with a note that it's in-universe.

Edited by ading I'm a Troper!!!
Steven1991 TV lover Since: Jan, 2011
TV lover
Jun 15th 2011 at 12:23:19 PM •••

Maybe not the right place to say here, but how do you call a new introduced character that particually is only seen with certain members of the main cast, while with the others he hasn't any contact at all.

Example: Bob, Job, Rob, Mob are characters during seasons 1-4, season 5 introduces Slob. He only has contact with Bob and Job while he doesn't know that Rob and Mob even exist.

Does this trope already exist or not?

Hide / Show Replies
hayleychaotix Since: Mar, 2011
Jul 19th 2011 at 2:11:37 PM •••

Go to the Lost and Found. It should be on the left side of the screen, you put descriptions in there to see if there's a trope for it.

lrrose Since: Jul, 2009
Mar 23rd 2011 at 11:11:30 AM •••

Complete Monsters are meant to be hated (or at least they were, until trope decay forced Complete Monster into YMMV territory, but that's a debate for another time). The Scrappy is not meant to be hated. So I would like to say no, but since both are subjective tropes, the real answer is yes.

ading Since: Jan, 2011
Mar 23rd 2011 at 12:27:39 PM •••

The Scrappy can be meant to be hated, though they usually aren't. And while a Complete Monster is probably going to be hated in the sense of "the audience can't wait for him to get defeated" (Unless they're a Draco in Leather Pants), I'm not sure they're prone to being hated in the "the audience wishes this character were never made to begin with" sense.

I'm a Troper!!!
KSonik Since: Jan, 2015
Apr 24th 2011 at 9:12:50 AM •••

It does not really matter why they get hated. Regardless of whether or not the character is hated for legitimate or illegitmate reasons, regardless of whether or not it was intended or not, if they are widely hated, then they belong to this trope.

Edited by KSonik
ading Since: Jan, 2011
May 3rd 2011 at 3:59:03 PM •••

This trope is not just a character who is hated, it is a character who has a hatedom. A "hatedom" is a fandom (for lack of a better term) dedicated to hating something. Are Complete Monsters really likely to be that? That is the question. (Actually I'm not reallly sure about a few of the entries, but this is just the one I asked about.)

I'm a Troper!!!
MangaManiac Since: Aug, 2010
Nov 30th 2010 at 11:38:56 AM •••

I noticed Fanon Discontinuity subpages have a Darth Wiki look to them, all black and stuff. Is there a way to do that for The Scrappy subpages? Seems fitting.

173.57.13.6 Since: Dec, 1969
Apr 11th 2010 at 12:58:11 PM •••

I looked at the video game pages and some of the characters would fit in another category such as tier induced scrappy. In fact a lot of these scrappys should belong on a different scrappy page. Isn't that why we have subcategories?

Top