Follow TV Tropes

Discussion Main / TheLawOfFanJackassery

Go To

Jun 6th 2013 at 1:07:31 PM •••

I'm wondering if peak is furries

Edited by 216.99.32.42
Sep 15th 2011 at 5:59:22 PM •••

I'd say this is wrong. The drop off at mainstream is going the wrong way. The more mainstream something it, the more jackasses it seems to attract. Don't believe me? Twilight.

Hide/Show Replies
Oct 26th 2011 at 1:35:43 PM •••

I totally agree. The more popular a work is, the more jackasses it attracts. Cause you know, Humans Are Bastards. Simple as that.

Edited by Sligh
Oct 30th 2011 at 1:26:28 PM •••

Dear God, would it kill people to use Humans Are Bastards correctly for once?

Apr 22nd 2012 at 10:16:30 PM •••

I agree with the original point. I mean Harry Potter has a huge number of jackasses.

Jun 18th 2014 at 2:20:53 PM •••

I'd argue that Twilight is evidence IN FAVOUR of the accuracy of the original theory, actually. Twilight has basically zero fans outside of teenage girldom, and your average Twilight fan seems to be a colossal Jackass. Something with a larger and more diverse fanbase, like Harry Potter or the Lord of the Rings or the works of Agatha Christie, generally has a fandom comprised of 90% normal people and a comparative few abnormally jackassed individuals of varying levels of loudness.

Jan 23rd 2011 at 2:33:47 PM •••

You could replace 'Fan Jackassery' with 'Fandom Zeal'.

The more mainstream exposure a work has, the fewer people feel that strongly about it, and the rare 'protector of the plot continuum' types can be ignored. If there's any community at all, most of the activity level will be more directed to other interests than the work.

Toward the middle of the curve, enough of the fanbase feel they have a special bond with the work to become attractive targets for attention-seeking trolls, and enough clueless noobs for the core community to start laying down law and swinging cluebats.

At the far end, the fewer fans are more humble about their devotion, so aren't easily incited to flamewar and don't provide trolls enough attention or fuel. Also clueless newbs are few enough to be dealt with patiently rather than outright Gannon-Banned.

Nov 14th 2010 at 8:55:52 AM •••

I could see additional graphs- one labelled "Law of fan jackassery according to hipsters" with a parabolic curve topping out with the subject's popularity, for example.

Oct 12th 2010 at 5:01:33 AM •••

While I do agree with the law as a concept, the language used is just asking for flamebait. Further name-calling and making assumptions about their lives, accurate or not, is inherently hypocritical when you're going to call them "jackasses."

Hide/Show Replies
FastEddie MOD
Oct 12th 2010 at 5:30:29 AM •••

Jiggered it around. Less bitchy, now.

Apr 15th 2010 at 6:14:28 PM •••

This trope is exactly what is wrong with comics (superhero or otherwise), and why fans have such a bad reputation. The level of jackasses in it is way too high, so this tends to alienate new readers. I think Chris Simms (on comics alliance) once said, the best AND worst things about comics, is the fans, and their level of dedication.

Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Top

How well does it match the trope?

Example of:

/

Media sources:

/

Report