Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / StationaryWings

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 22nd 2021 at 10:27:38 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Should aversions be listed?, started by storyyeller on Mar 22nd 2011 at 10:03:42 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Camacan MOD Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 19th 2011 at 9:36:41 PM •••

Dropping the real life section to discussion. This trope is when a character that would be expected to use their wings in flight does not move them, usually as a stylistic choice. Real life airplanes aren't expected to flap. Real soaring birds are not equivalent to a fictional character like a fairy hanging in mid-air with stationary wings.

Real Life

  • Truth in Television: For years, engineers working on powered flight thought that the wings on their aircraft had to flap (referred to as an "ornithopter"). It was the realization that they didn't that led to the successful invention of airplanes.
  • This is somewhat true for many birds of prey. Powered flight requires a lot of energy, and hovering by flapping the wings is a lot of energy to go nowhere. Just look at the hummingbird, it has to eat a ton of sugar every day! Larger birds are capable of true hovering, but a lot of energy is saved by simply flying into a headwind. This does require slight shifts in the wings and tail, but the overall appearance is that the wings are motionless, especially when the bird is miles above the ground.

hayleychaotix Hayleychaotix Since: Mar, 2011
Hayleychaotix
Jul 30th 2011 at 6:28:52 AM •••

Are aversions notable enough to be listed?

Edited by hayleychaotix
Top