Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / RaisedByDudes

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Snarf Since: Jan, 2010
Dec 30th 2013 at 1:29:21 PM •••

So what about the inverse of the trope (not often seen, but it is possible—and increasingly likely these days) in which a boy is raised by a lesbian couple?

Edited by 150.148.14.38
girlyboy Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 9th 2010 at 4:29:42 PM •••

I agree that the trope is a Double Standard but I think the current second paragraph is a bit mis-aimed. The trope isn't about dudes being bad at nurturing babies, per se, it's more about their dude-ish behaviour influencing the growing child and leading to it becoming bad at social interaction, esp. with women. The Unfortunate Implications are the same — dudes raising kids is bad news! They need a mommy! — but I don't think it gets there quite in the way the description suggests right now.

Hide / Show Replies
girlyboy Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 10th 2010 at 2:09:50 PM •••

I edited it a bit. Earlier version was "Often comes with the Unfortunate Implication that, in the absence of women, men are at best mediocre at raising children, especially little girls, and are just terrible when it comes to nurturing and caring for a newborn baby. Can set up a Double Standard for Real Life House Husbands and single dads."

jatay3 Since: Oct, 2010
Jun 3rd 2012 at 9:08:01 AM •••

The same people who object to gay marriage for this reason object to single parenting. In any case that is neither here nor there. It is unfair to site controversial subjects without giving opponents a chance to reply and opponents don't have a chance to reply on the Main lest they receive the Natter Scarlet Letter.

JoieDeCombat Since: May, 2009
Oct 29th 2010 at 5:18:54 AM •••

I'm noticing that in a lot of the examples, the fact that the character was raised by a man or group of men seems incidental to the fact that whoever raised them was abusive or otherwise dysfunctional, or the character was a Child Soldier raised by the military. How much of a distinction should we be making here?

Hide / Show Replies
Westrim Since: Jan, 2001
Oct 29th 2010 at 9:11:09 AM •••

Not much. I've modified the intro so that dysfunctions isn't directly tied in, just a common occurrence. The focus is on the circumstance of there being no women in the character's formative years.

I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.
Westrim Since: Jan, 2001
Oct 29th 2010 at 9:11:09 AM •••

Not much. I've modified the intro so that dysfunctions isn't directly tied in, just a common occurrence. The focus is on the circumstance of there being no women in the character's formative years.

I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.
joeyjojo Happy New Year! Since: Jan, 2001
Happy New Year!
Sep 6th 2010 at 8:21:10 PM •••

i changed the real life bit from Wall Banger to Double Standard as single parents 'are' turned down for adoption often.

hashtagsarestupid
joeyjojo Happy New Year! Since: Jan, 2001
Happy New Year!
Sep 6th 2010 at 8:20:38 PM •••

i changed the real life bit from Wall Banger to Double Standard as single parents 'are' turned down for adoption often.

hashtagsarestupid
joeyjojo Happy New Year! Since: Jan, 2001
Happy New Year!
Sep 6th 2010 at 8:20:29 PM •••

i changed the real life bit from Wall Banger to Double Standard as single parents 'are' turned down for adoption often.

hashtagsarestupid
Top