Follow TV Tropes

Discussion Main / PraisingShowsYouDontWatch

Go To

Nov 20th 2014 at 10:25:28 AM •••

I had the idea to include a chain of stores on this trope page to illustrate that this can occur with things that are not fictional works, but I do not know if it violates the site's policy of taking examples from companies.

Mar 31st 2014 at 11:26:07 PM •••

Man. This page seems to indicate you can pretty much just name anything popular and claim its popularity outstrips the public's actual experience with it. I kinda wonder if maybe it would be good to have some requirement beyond one troper's hunch on a particular entry. I seriously doubt even a quarter of these have any genuine data behind them.

Hide/Show Replies
Apr 1st 2014 at 12:52:58 AM •••

This is the principle by which all YMMV pages operate - there is no point to making an effort to collect data.

Jul 22nd 2013 at 12:23:12 PM •••


  • Barely any of the people who say that original format of Doctor Who is better than the 2005 revival have actually watched most, if any, of the serials (or in the case of Missing Episodes from the 60s, listened to the soundtrack recording and its linking narration).

I don't think this could be true. People who never watched the older shows might be angry that the show was revived for some reason, or they might simply not like the new seasons, but I find it hard to believe that a large amount of people are making comparisons without being at all familiar with one of the groups being compared.

Sep 23rd 2011 at 2:20:58 AM •••

:( This describes me and my obsession of Portal 2 and Megaman (The Latter is justified because I have an action figure of him)

Aug 20th 2011 at 12:09:55 AM •••

"Richard Feynman mentioned in his autobiography a case when one publisher sent to the California State Curriculum Commission a schoolbook, but it wasn't ready for print, so it had empty pages. Six out of the ten members of the commission still rated the book favorably literally judging it by the cover!. Ironically, it was one of the highest rated books, and according to Feynman's snarky autobiographical account, none of the other members understood why he hadn't rated the textbook."

The Moral: Content in textbooks is so awful that the best textbook is one that has no content at all. *

Cut natter from the Twilight example and edited it to incorporate it and attempt to clean up the grammar.

Edited by MorganWick
Jun 16th 2011 at 3:34:01 PM •••

Not sure Burn Notice is really an appropriate example here. At least in my neck of the woods, everyone and their fourt cousin watches Burn Notice. People get depressed during off-times and set aside Thursday evenings to watch it. And then people proceed to gossip about it to a ridiculous degree.

Jan 13th 2011 at 1:36:59 PM •••

A lot of natter, especially in the Video Games section. Tried to fix some of it.

Dec 10th 2010 at 7:08:45 AM •••

We definitely need to dump non-fictional examples, or at least all examples that start with "Lots of people..." or "After X, many started..." Actually, we could probably keep it to published examples (including examples from reviews) and be approximately 63% less whiny.

Sep 27th 2010 at 1:28:29 AM •••

That page just became a dumping ground for bashing shows, bashing people who bash shows and moaning. The examples on this one are still relevant. (At least, I think that's the reason.)

Sep 18th 2017 at 12:24:03 PM •••

Judging by how this was posted years ago, it was a lot worse, but honestly, it has the same problem of thinly-veiled complaining about shows the user finds overrated or how people are "enjoying them wrong". Honestly, I think this page should be definition-only

Aug 18th 2010 at 1:14:15 PM •••

Portal is surely going to go this way, don't you think?

Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.

How well does it match the trope?

Example of:


Media sources: