The main article seems to be way, way overdeveloped for something that most people understand already.
How do I know that the mother bird didn't stand on the other chick's head while feeding the latter afterwards?
In uffish thought
I have changed the page image unilaterally, since it was only cropping a few pixels off the bottom and did not need an Image Pickin' thread.
The old page image
◊, captioned "Datz when i knew i wuz not favourite." It has been replaced with this one
◊:
This is because the old one had part of the bottom strip from icanhascheezburger images; clearly it was an image macro (insta-pull criteria) with the writing cropped off. The new version also has the bottom strip cropped. I have also removed the caption. This is because it added nothing and, judging by the atrotious spelling, was the text from the original macro. Feel free to add a new, good caption.
Edited by Telcontar That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
“The disabled child will be either completely ignored, left in the care of therapists, and/or institutionalised while the "normal" child will get their parents' undivided attention (as the disabled child is a "lost cause" while the "normal" child "still has hope").”
Literally me.
Edited by ToyStoryinSpacePlaySet