Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / MermaidProblem

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
just4once Since: Mar, 2024
Mar 22nd 2024 at 1:07:08 PM •••

is this really common enough discussed to be a trope

Hide / Show Replies
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Mar 22nd 2024 at 1:59:10 PM •••

Apparently, given the sheer number of examples discussing it.

Though to be fair, there are some examples of Interspecies Romance where the problem explicitly goes unaddressed but is presumably the case.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
h27kim Since: May, 2012
Jul 13th 2014 at 9:46:44 PM •••

This is a real life issue with some fish, most notably sharks, that are oviviparous or viviparous, and they do have organs through which males can inseminate females that look and work much the way their mammal counterparts do (even if they might have totally different origins). I don't think the problem is necessarily that mer-people in fictitious depictions should lack such organs. The real problem is that they are depicted as naked below waist without their naughty parts, analogous to the way cartoon animals are shown lacking the same organs. Couldn't anyone draw mer-people with their versions of pants or skirts? It seems that some of the older depictions of mermaids do feature them wearing mermaid dresses that cover the appropriate parts.

Edited by 71.226.42.108
71.192.246.98 Since: Dec, 1969
Dec 27th 2010 at 1:51:34 PM •••

mermaid sex makes perfect sense if the mermaid and her sweetie are lesbians. why assume there has to be a penis in order for there to be sex? awfully heterosexist, don't you think? not to mention, unimaginative...

Hide / Show Replies
Alexlayer (Old Master)
Dec 27th 2010 at 6:27:07 PM •••

The "Problem" here is about not just sex, but reproduction, where genitals (what everyone wonders whenever mermaid and merman have or don't) are fundamental. And unless you go with Sci-Fi or Fantasy, there's not gonna be much place for Homosexual Reproduction (specially under the water. Dunno, just makes it even more odd...)

I don't think this thread has any reason to be called "sexist"

Stoogebie Since: Apr, 2011
Apr 2nd 2012 at 8:02:01 AM •••

Yeah, why call it sexist? Although no one is jumping to conclusions about your theory of lesbian mermaids, but then again, maybe mermaids are lesbian after all; I mean, how often do you hear of mermen by contrast?*

Edited by Stoogebie
Wardog Since: May, 2010
Apr 10th 2011 at 11:21:47 AM •••

This needn't be as much of a problem as some people think.

First off, in olden times, people were much less precise about the use of the word "fish" - it basically meant anything that lived in the sea. It's quite possible that mermaids are actually a type of cetacean, or maybe even a close relative of humans via the Aquatic ape hypothesis.

Alternatively, some fish (such as the Elasmobranchii basically mate the same way as mammals do.

In any case, as has been pointed out, they'll still have some sort of opening down there, as well as hands and a mouth.

The real problem, though, is - assuming mermaids are fish - why to they have breasts in the first place (or hair, and other human characteristics).

Based on some of the legends, as well as numerous real-life examples of animals that have evolved to attract other species, the most likely explanation is far more of a problem for anyone thinking of a romantic enounter with a mermaid.

Edited by Wardog
Traedeer Since: May, 2010
Mar 12th 2011 at 10:04:27 AM •••

Should there be a NSFW picture on the top of the page? Just makes labeling all external links NSFW redundant if we have it on our own website.

Korbl Korbl Since: Jan, 2001
Korbl
Jan 12th 2011 at 4:00:01 AM •••

"(what's a flashing mermaid got to with coffee anyway?)" ...What's a fictional seaman got to do with it?

lvthn13 Since: Dec, 2009
Jul 15th 2010 at 4:27:29 AM •••

Does this apply to non-mermaids who are some other obviously non-compatable species from the waist down, or is there a separate trope for that? In particular I'm thinking there are at least a few examples of half-snakes, though that's somewhat less rarely brought up, probably because any such hybrids seem to be nearly always villains and hence the possibility of their deviant fuckery is never brought up.

75.73.70.113 Since: Dec, 1969
Apr 19th 2010 at 6:07:05 PM •••

Are fish genitalia really that baffling? I understood that most vertebrates in that general area of the animal kingdom have a universal opening.. Everything that needs to come out, comes out.. if males push up against a female, they can make a deposit.. otherwise they can do the cloud thing like most fish.. but.. surely that's close enough.. It's a hole.. a hole's a hole. Fish have holes, right? That and.. if the fishtail is horizontal, clearly the mammal genes have influenced the fish bits, just like vice versa tends to happen putting some fins on the human elbows or whatever..

Top