As I understand, the term refers only to underpants as such, so being braless is not itself an instance of the trope. However, because of frequent overlaps with Vapor Wear, the lack of a bra may still be worth mentioning in instances where both are missing, possibly with a pothole to the latter trope.
Do the examples really need to be spaced out the way they currently are?
By now, it should be clear to all except the most dense of us that sheep are secretly conspiring to kill us all and steal our pants.
Sorcerer in training
The Hunchback of Notre Dame example (Disney version) doesn't seem like an example to me, since it only addresses an underdress. Any thoughts?
Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry Pratchett Hide / Show Replies
The example itself doesn't address anything beyond the underdress, but a more careful examination of the scene might provide additional details.
edit after watching the scene: No such information presented itself, and in fact the moment described in the existing example is less than conclusive even insofar as the underdress is concerned than the example makes it sound. Removing non-example now.
Edited by 24.4.12.237
Before I go on a deletion spree, can I get confirmation that "commando" is NOT "braless"?
Hide / Show Replies