HazelMcCallister
Since: Jul, 2016
Jan 2nd 2022 at 8:51:52 AM
•••
You could make that clear on the page itself. As is, it just looks like a strange inconsistency where this is just a "fan-speak term" but for some reason Bishōnen is considered an actual trope.
Note to all: I don't participate in the forums here unless something much more important than TV Tropes content is at stake.
Aquar1us
Since: Jun, 2011
Jul 23rd 2015 at 10:26:18 AM
•••
Bishōjo should be the main title, with the others redirecting (as is already the case with Bishōnen)
Edited by Aquar1us
UltimaThule
Since: Oct, 2010
Jun 19th 2011 at 2:32:18 PM
•••
Should we split this into two different pages? One for the bishoujo character type (as with Bishōnen), and one for bishoujo series, perhaps?
Hide / Show Replies
Accelgray220
Since: May, 2012
Jun 7th 2012 at 8:50:07 PM
•••
Nobody seems to be interested... I wonder why. I support the idea tho
lebrel
Since: Oct, 2009
Jun 8th 2012 at 8:26:48 AM
•••
We already have Bishoujo Series.
Calling someone a pedant is an automatic Insult Backfire. Real pedants will be flattered.
All examples are not and will never be allowed for this trope.
For another, all example sections exist on probation only - the moment they cause problems like Natter, Edit Wars, or Flame Wars, they go. The Bishōjo (Bishoujo) all examples cause all three.
Therefore, we will not have them. Don not ask or nominate anyone.
Hide / Show Replies