Follow TV Tropes
How is this discussion natter? Most of it seems valid and fridge enough.
Well, for one thing it has terrible Example Indentation.
Ok so, rearrange some of the posts and it's more cohesive. I still don't get how it's natter.
It's a blatant Conversation On The Main Page, which is unacceptable even on a "Fridge" page.
I removed this example from the page:
It may be a valid example, but it's basically a wall of text. If you want to add it back, make it briefer.
does anyone else think the remake has an in universe explanation of the changes if it wanted them, namely future e gadd and the buterfly effect, both the original and the remake are 100% canon and all changes in the remake can be explained the fact that luigi is, in the 3ds remake contacted by professor E Gadd from the future using time travel(that does not come out of nowhere either, see partners in time)and then asked to test \"gooigi\" means that every single diference between the gamecube original and the 3ds remake in fact can have a certain cause, first the original gamecube version happened, then a little while later (probably just before or after dark moon)professor e gadd decides to test gooigi via time travel, and \"then\" the remake happens, those are 2 seperate timelines, but the changes between them are so minor that the end result is the same, as for example, a time travelor changing what one person had for breakfest would produce 2 timelines which are functionally identical if nothing else changed, all differences between the original and remake result from E gad\'s contact or gooigi\'s presence in some way, even if it is through the butterfly effect and in ways hard to articulate, for example the poulterpup followed gooigi into the past, and that is why he is in the remake, but not in the original
Community Showcase More
How well does it match the trope?