The first part means exactly what it says: Star Wars: Clone Wars (not to be confused with Star Wars The Clone Wars) is Legends material, which means it's non-canon. It's on the top of the page that Legends stuff don't belong here.
Also while the microseries version of Grievous might've been introduced earlier, he was based on concept arts and descriptions provided from the production of Revenge of the Sith. He was created for the movie, before he got introduced in the series. He isn't a character Tartakovsky's crew came up with, and got added to the movie due to his popularity. Thus, Revenge of the Sith Grievous is the original, and CW-Grievous is the adaptation, regardless of order of appearence.
On a sidenote, Adaptational Wimp is currently on TRS, and the entry in question perfectly demonstrated why: it's pointless complaining about They Changed It, Now It Sucks!, and not an actual example of the trope.
Regarding this pull:
Here's the reason: "The unstoppable, monstrous Grievous is in Star Wars Clone Wars, which is Legends. Also, factually incorrect, since the microseries version is the adaptational one and movie/TCW version the original, making the former an Adaptational Badass."
I don't get what the first part is saying, but the second is just untrue, since Grievous was introduced in Clone Wars which came out before Revenge Of The Sith. Saying that his CW appearance is Adaptational Badass is nonsensical since it came out before the thing it's supposedly an adaptation of.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them. Hide / Show Replies