Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / Monster

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"No more than some RL moral standards\\\", correct. But there are countless moral codes in RL, many Drastically Different from each other with 2 capital Ds. Some systems see things in a Black / White way, on more than 1 level: A specific action is automatically Wrong / Bad to the highest degree possible regardless of circumstances and intentions, many \\\"wrong\\\" things are considered equally wrong no matter their nature and circumstances - to a high extent in general - and if you commit any of them, you are considered pure evil with no redeeming traits ignoring everything else. I personally think those RL systems are flawed to an enormous extent. My intended idea is that those systems, whether in fiction or RL, are quite far from being \\\"just and efficient\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"No more than some RL moral standards\\\", correct. But there are countless moral codes in RL, some Drastically Different from another with 2 capital Ds. Some of said systems see things in a Black / White way, on more than 1 level: A specific action is automatically Wrong / Bad to the highest degree possible regardless of circumstances and intentions, many \\\"wrong\\\" things are considered equally wrong no matter their nature and circumstances - to a high extent in general - and if you commit any of them, you are considered pure evil with no redeeming traits ignoring everything else. I personally think those RL systems are flawed to an enormous extent. My intended idea is that those systems, whether in fiction or RL, are quiet far from being \\\"just and efficient\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"No more than some RL moral standards\\\", correct. But there are countless moral codes in RL, some Drastically Different from another with 2 capital Ds. Some of said systems see things in a Black / White way, on more than 1 level: A specific action is automatically Wrong / Bad to the Fullest regardless of circumstances and intentions), many \\\"wrong\\\" things are considered equally wrong no matter their nature and circumstances - to a high extent in general - and if you commit one, you are considered irredeemably evil. I personally think those RL systems are flawed to an enormous extent. My intended idea is that those systems, whether in fiction or RL, are quiet far from being \\\"just and efficient\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"No more than some RL moral standards\\\", correct. But there are countless moral codes in RL, some Drastically Different from another with 2 capital Ds. Some of said systems see things in a Black / White way, on more than 1 level: A specific action is automatically Wrong / Bad regardless of the circumstances (including intentions), many \\\"wrong\\\" things are considered equally wrong and to a high extent in general, and if you commit one, you are considered irredeemably evil. I personally think those RL systems are flawed to an enormous extent. My intended idea is that those systems, whether in fiction or RL, are quiet far from being \\\"just and efficient\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"No more than those moral standards\\\", correct. But there are countless moral codes in RL, some Drastically Different from another with 2 capital Ds. Some of said systems see things in a Black / White way, and on more than 1 level: A specific action is wrong regardless of the circumstances (including intentions), and if you commit it, you are irredeemably evil. I personally think those RL systems are flawed to an enormous extent. My intended idea is that those systems, whether in fiction or RL, are quiet far from being \\\"just and efficient\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"No more than those moral standards\\\", correct. But there are countless moral codes in RL, some Drastically Different from another with 2 capital Ds. Some of said systems see things in a Black / White way, and on more than 1 level: A specific action is wrong regardless of the circumstances (including intentions), and if you commit it, you are irredeemably evil. I personally think those RL systems are flawed to an enormous extent. So my idea here is that those systems, whether in fiction or RL, are far from \\\" very moral and efficient\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"No more than those moral standards\\\", correct. But there are countless moral codes in RL, some Drastically Different from another with 2 capital Ds. Some of said systems see things in a Black / White way, and on more than 1 level: A specific action is wrong no matter the circumstances (including intentions), and if you commit it, you are irredeemably evil. I personally think those RL systems are flawed to an enormous extent. So my idea here is that those systems, whether in fiction or RL, are far from \\\" very moral and efficient\\\".
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"No more than those moral standards\\\", correct. But there are countless moral codes in RL, some Drastically Different from another with 2 capital Ds. Some of said systems see things in a Black / White way, and on more than 1 level: A specific action is wrong no matter the circumstances (including intentions), and if you commit it, you are irredeemably evil. I personally think those RL systems are flawed to an enormous extent. So my idea here is that those systems, whether in fiction or RL, are far from \\\"moral and efficient\\\".
Top