[005]
sanfranman91
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does anyone else think \'\'Film/FantasticFour2015\'\' qualifies? It\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\'s signature battlecry \
to:
Does anyone else think \\\'\\\'Film/FantasticFour2015\\\'\\\' qualifies? It\\\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\\\'s signature battlecry \\\"It\\\'s clobbering time!\\\" has become an oath Ben Grimm\\\'s brother states before he abuses his younger sibling) and butchered characters (such as Doom).
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 9% on RT (which once hit as low as 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and Marvel\\\'s website does not mention it at all (keep in mind that their site acknowledges \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Film/HowardTheDuck\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'). It is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts on the matter? I\\\'ve posted [[http://channelawesome.com/chris-stuckmann-fantastic-four/ a review from Chris Stuckmann]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xbTzn89Qo a review from Moviebob]] in case you\\\'re interested.
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 9% on RT (which once hit as low as 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and Marvel\\\'s website does not mention it at all (keep in mind that their site acknowledges \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'Film/HowardTheDuck\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\'). It is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts on the matter? I\\\'ve posted [[http://channelawesome.com/chris-stuckmann-fantastic-four/ a review from Chris Stuckmann]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xbTzn89Qo a review from Moviebob]] in case you\\\'re interested.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does anyone else think \'\'Film/FantasticFour2015\'\' qualifies? It\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\'s signature battlecry \
to:
Does anyone else think \\\'\\\'Film/FantasticFour2015\\\'\\\' qualifies? It\\\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\\\'s signature battlecry \\\"It\\\'s clobbering time!\\\" has become an oath Ben Grimm\\\'s brother states before he abuses his younger sibling) and butchered characters (such as Doom).
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 9% on RT (which once hit as low as 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and it is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts on the matter? I\\\'ve posted [[http://channelawesome.com/chris-stuckmann-fantastic-four/ a review from Chris Stuckmann]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xbTzn89Qo a review from Moviebob]] in case you\\\'re interested.
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 9% on RT (which once hit as low as 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and it is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts on the matter? I\\\'ve posted [[http://channelawesome.com/chris-stuckmann-fantastic-four/ a review from Chris Stuckmann]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xbTzn89Qo a review from Moviebob]] in case you\\\'re interested.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does anyone else think \'\'Film/FantasticFour2015\'\' qualifies? It\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\'s signature battlecry \
to:
Does anyone else think \\\'\\\'Film/FantasticFour2015\\\'\\\' qualifies? It\\\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\\\'s signature battlecry \\\"It\\\'s clobbering time!\\\" has become an oath Ben Grimm\\\'s brother states before he abuses his younger sibling) and butchered characters (such as Doom).
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 10% on RT (which once hit as low as 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and it is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts on the matter? I\\\'ve posted [[http://channelawesome.com/chris-stuckmann-fantastic-four/ a review from Chris Stuckmann]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xbTzn89Qo a review from Moviebob]] in case you\\\'re interested.
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 10% on RT (which once hit as low as 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and it is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts on the matter? I\\\'ve posted [[http://channelawesome.com/chris-stuckmann-fantastic-four/ a review from Chris Stuckmann]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xbTzn89Qo a review from Moviebob]] in case you\\\'re interested.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does anyone else think \'\'Film/FantasticFour2015\'\' qualifies? It\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\'s signature battlecry \
to:
Does anyone else think \\\'\\\'Film/FantasticFour2015\\\'\\\' qualifies? It\\\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\\\'s signature battlecry \\\"It\\\'s clobbering time!\\\" has become an oath Ben Grimm\\\'s brother states before he abuses his younger sibling) and butchered characters (such as Doom).
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 10% on RT (which once hit as low as 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and it is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts on the matter? I\\\'ve posted [[http://channelawesome.com/chris-stuckmann-fantastic-four/ a review from Chris Stuckmann]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xbTzn89Qo a review from Moviebob]] in case you\\\'re interested in looking up to some reviews.
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 10% on RT (which once hit as low as 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and it is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts on the matter? I\\\'ve posted [[http://channelawesome.com/chris-stuckmann-fantastic-four/ a review from Chris Stuckmann]] and [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22xbTzn89Qo a review from Moviebob]] in case you\\\'re interested in looking up to some reviews.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does anyone else think \'\'Film/FantasticFour2015\'\' qualifies? It\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\'s signature battlecry \
to:
Does anyone else think \\\'\\\'Film/FantasticFour2015\\\'\\\' qualifies? It\\\'s been blasted to hell and back for being an InNameOnly adaptation that takes the DarkerAndEdgier trope way too far. Awful acting, horrible CGI, excessive exposition, and woeful writing are the tip of the iceberg. The film has also become notorious for being disrespectful to the franchise (case in point: The Thing\\\'s signature battlecry \\\"It\\\'s clobbering time!\\\" has become an oath Ben Grimm\\\'s brother states before he abuses his younger sibling) and butchered characters (such as Doom).
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 10% on RT (which once hit 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and it is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts?
As for scores, it currently has a 4.1 on iMDB and a 10% on RT (which once hit 7%), ranking lower on RT than other notorious comic-based goofs like Howard the Duck (14%), X-Men Origins: Wolverine (38%), and Superman IV (12%). The public and critics unanimously consider it the worst of Fox\\\'s Marvel films and it is likely to kill Josh Trank\\\'s career and end Fox\\\'s control of the Fantastic Four license.
Thoughts?
