Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Characters / CriminalMinds

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \'07, with the first MW coming out in November). Though it was actually based on [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OkoWEMCnLQ this]], including directly lifting lines from it and even giving the gunship the same callsign.
to:
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\\\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which was fresh in people\\\'s memories when the game came out (the video was leaked in February of \\\'07, with the first MW coming out in November). Though it was actually based on [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OkoWEMCnLQ this]], including directly lifting lines from it and even giving the gunship the same callsign.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Still, the level specifically has you \'\'not\'\' attack designated civilian targets and insta-fails you if you do, so the \
to:
Still, the level specifically has you \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' attack designated civilian targets and insta-fails you if you do, so the \\\"moral event horizon\\\" part really doesn\\\'t work well; it explicitly \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a combat scenario since if you watch them, all the guys you\\\'re supposed to shoot at are armed and will attack the guys you\\\'re supporting.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \'07, with the first MW coming out in November). Though it was actually based on [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OkoWEMCnLQ this]], including directly lifting lines from it.
to:
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\\\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \\\'07, with the first MW coming out in November). Though it was actually based on [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OkoWEMCnLQ this]], including directly lifting lines from it and even giving the gunship the same callsign.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Still, the level specifically has you \'\'not\'\' attack designated civilian targets and insta-fails you if you do, so the \
to:
Still, the level specifically has you \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' attack designated civilian targets and insta-fails you if you do, so the \\\"moral event horizon\\\" part really doesn\\\'t work well; it explicitly \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a combat scenario since if you watch them, all the guys you\\\'re supposed to shoot at are armed and will attack the guys you\\\'re supporting.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \'07, with the first MW coming out in November).
to:
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\\\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \\\'07, with the first MW coming out in November). Though it was actually based on [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OkoWEMCnLQ this]], including directly lifting lines from it.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Still, the level specifically has you \'\'not\'\' attack designated civilian targets and insta-fails you if you do, so the \
to:
Still, the level specifically has you \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' attack designated civilian targets and insta-fails you if you do, so the \\\"moral event horizon\\\" part really doesn\\\'t work well; it explicitly \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a combat scenario since if you watch them, all the guys you\\\'re supposed to shoot at are armed and will attack the guys you\\\'re supporting.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \'07, with the first MW coming out in November).
to:
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\\\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \\\'07, with the first MW coming out in November).

Still, the level specifically has you \\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\' attack designated civilian targets and insta-fails you if you do, so the \\\"moral event horizon\\\" part really doesn\\\'t work well; it explicitly \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a combat scenario since if you watch them, all the guys you\\\'re supposed to shoot at are armed and will attack the guys you\\\'re supporting.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\'t really an more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \'07, with the first MW coming out in November).
to:
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\\\'t really any more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \\\'07, with the first MW coming out in November).
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\'t really an more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made.
to:
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\\\'t really an more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made (the video was leaked in February of \\\'07, with the first MW coming out in November).
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It\'s a tragic accident, but it isn\'t really an more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made.
to:
The entry was written as if the eeeeevil US military makes a habit of firing on civilians for no reason; that incident was a tragic accident caused by miscommunication between soldiers who had reason to think their lives might be in danger and journalists not realising that sighting up a camera looks a hell of a lot like sighting up an RPG. It isn\\\'t really an more related to that level than, say, the equally infamous video of American [=A-10s=] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/190th_Fighter_Squadron,_Blues_and_Royals_friendly_fire_incident accidentally engaging British vehicles in 2003]], destroying two vehicles, killing 1 soldier and wounding 5 -- an incident which the 2007 game was probably thinking of when the level was made.
Top