[007]
antva
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[TheAntiChrist Daimon Hellstrom]]; [[WhereIWasBornAndRazed Lobo]]; [[HeroicSociopath Deadpool]]; [[EvilOverlord Dark Schneider]]; [[WouldBeRudeToSayGenocide Vegeta]]; [[{{HellSing}} Alucard]]; [[EvilutionaryBiologist Mayuri]]; [[{{Gorn}} The Comedian]]; [[PsychoForHire Kratos]]; GrandTheftAuto protagonists; [[DarkStalkers Demitri Maximoff]]; [[{{Fable}} Reaver]]; [[VentureBrothers Doctor Venture]]; and [[UberMensch assorted mythological heroes]]. would all qualify from my perspective.
to:
[[TheAntiChrist Daimon Hellstrom]]; [[WhereIWasBornAndRazed Lobo]]; [[HeroicSociopath Deadpool]]; [[EvilOverlord Dark Schneider]]; [[WouldBeRudeToSayGenocide Vegeta]]; [[{{HellSing}} Alucard]]; [[EvilutionaryBiologist Mayuri]]; [[PsychoForHire The Comedian]]; [[{{Gorn}} Kratos]]; GrandTheftAuto protagonists; [[DarkStalkers Demitri Maximoff]]; [[{{Fable}} Reaver]]; [[VentureBrothers Doctor Venture]]; and [[UberMensch assorted mythological heroes]]. would all qualify from my perspective.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[TheAntiChrist Daimon Hellstrom]]; [[WhereIWasBornAndRazed Lobo]]; [[PsychoForHire Deadpool]]; [[EvilOverlord Dark Schneider]]; [[WouldBeRudeToSayGenocide Vegeta]]; [[{{HellSing}} Alucard]]; [[EvilutionaryBiologist Mayuri]]; [[{{Gorn}} The Comedian]]; [[PsychoForHire Kratos]]; GrandTheftAuto protagonists; [[DarkStalkers Demitri Maximoff]]; [[{{Fable}} Reaver]]; [[VentureBrothers Doctor Venture]]; and [[UberMensch assorted mythological heroes]]. would all qualify from my perspective.
to:
[[TheAntiChrist Daimon Hellstrom]]; [[WhereIWasBornAndRazed Lobo]]; [[HeroicSociopath Deadpool]]; [[EvilOverlord Dark Schneider]]; [[WouldBeRudeToSayGenocide Vegeta]]; [[{{HellSing}} Alucard]]; [[EvilutionaryBiologist Mayuri]]; [[{{Gorn}} The Comedian]]; [[PsychoForHire Kratos]]; GrandTheftAuto protagonists; [[DarkStalkers Demitri Maximoff]]; [[{{Fable}} Reaver]]; [[VentureBrothers Doctor Venture]]; and [[UberMensch assorted mythological heroes]]. would all qualify from my perspective.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme, sadistic, and bloodthirsty views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them, with scientifically inaccurate (read [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freakonomics Freako]][[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperFreakonomics nomics]] for a start) convenient systematic HandWave rationalisations.
to:
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\\\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\\\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\\\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme, sadistic, and bloodthirsty views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them, with scientifically inaccurate (read [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freakonomics Freako]][[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperFreakonomics nomics]] for a start reference regarding how easy the human brain is possible to manipulate) convenient systematic HandWave rationalisations.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme, sadistic, and bloodthirsty views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them, with scientifically inaccurate (read [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freakonomics Freakonomics]] for a start) convenient systematic HandWave rationalisations.
to:
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\\\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\\\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\\\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme, sadistic, and bloodthirsty views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them, with scientifically inaccurate (read [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freakonomics Freako]][[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperFreakonomics nomics]] for a start) convenient systematic HandWave rationalisations.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme, sadistic, and bloodthirsty views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them, with scientifically inaccurate (read {{Freakonomics}} for a start) systematic HandWave rationalisations.
to:
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\\\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\\\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\\\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme, sadistic, and bloodthirsty views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them, with scientifically inaccurate (read [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freakonomics Freakonomics]] for a start) convenient systematic HandWave rationalisations.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them.
to:
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\\\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\\\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\\\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme, sadistic, and bloodthirsty views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them, with scientifically inaccurate (read {{Freakonomics}} for a start) systematic HandWave rationalisations.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And that\'s just the ones that are listed here, and I know about...
to:
And that\\\'s just the ones that are listed here, and I know about...
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\\\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\\\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\\\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them.
As for UberMensch, the characters themselves don\\\'t have to think about ideological implications, they simply have to embody the ideal for the writers, philosophers, or people drawing upon those those ideals. As usual it\\\'s about the narrative and writer more than it\\\'s about the character. Fiction has long been a way for people who have far too ridiculously extreme views (see above) to state through open discussion and treatise, to get away with making propaganda for them.
