[001]
antvasima
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I already tried to explain why. It\'s mostly a combination of \
to:
I already tried to explain why. It\\\'s mostly a combination of \\\"does not compute\\\" anal-retentive hangups, and differing perspectives on the marketed morality of narratives and the resulting social value influences. Seeing a sufficient number of outright bloodcrazed fascists or sociopaths feverishly proclaim the wonderful qualities of ThreeHundred, combined with assorted studies on the proven brainwashing effects of even brief calculated propaganda on the human mind has been quite an enlightening experience for me.
The question might extend to anybody here for any given topic, for that matter, so I don\\\'t see why you seem incredulous about this case? At least this one is reasonably relevant as far as the nature of media is concerned.
Regardless, cclospina changed the YMMV about about whether a character with the ability to do anything he or she pleases, including full-scale atrocities, gets away with, and looks appealing doing it, is a JerkSue or VillainSue, which doesn\\\'t make sense to me, as it is definitely very arguable.
As for type I, the fundamental problem with it seems to be that it includes two very different types of characters, due to strictly being a contrast to the Greek \\\"might makes right barbarian slaughtermachine\\\", unconnected to any moral sense of the term.
Also, which of the edited out tropes for type V should be kept do you think? Or should any more be added?
The question might extend to anybody here for any given topic, for that matter, so I don\\\'t see why you seem incredulous about this case? At least this one is reasonably relevant as far as the nature of media is concerned.
Regardless, cclospina changed the YMMV about about whether a character with the ability to do anything he or she pleases, including full-scale atrocities, gets away with, and looks appealing doing it, is a JerkSue or VillainSue, which doesn\\\'t make sense to me, as it is definitely very arguable.
As for type I, the fundamental problem with it seems to be that it includes two very different types of characters, due to strictly being a contrast to the Greek \\\"might makes right barbarian slaughtermachine\\\", unconnected to any moral sense of the term.
Also, which of the edited out tropes for type V should be kept do you think? Or should any more be added?
