Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Analysis / AntiHero

Go To

[002] ading Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Type V\'s are Anti Heroes. What seperates them from a VillainProtagonist is that they fight the CompleteMonsters, and are often SelfishGood; when they do good and fight evil, it\'s not because they want to do the right thing. Examples of a Type V would include Riddick and [[OrderOfTheStick Belkar Bitterleaf]]. But, yes, Type II\'s are morally \'\'better\'\' than a Type I. A Type I doesn\'t fit on the CharacterAlignment scale like the other ones do, as they are a different type altogether. Maybe we should have Types 0,A,B,C & D. At any rate, we can\'t be too technical. Because being an Anti Hero is in many ways like a medical condition, in that the individual doesn\'t always have all the classic \
to:
Type V\\\'s are Anti Heroes. What seperates them from a VillainProtagonist is that they fight the {{Complete Monster}}s, and are often SelfishGood; when they do good and fight evil, it\\\'s not because they want to do the right thing. Examples of a Type V would include Riddick and [[OrderOfTheStick Belkar Bitterleaf]]. But, yes, Type II\\\'s are morally \\\'\\\'better\\\'\\\' than a Type I. A Type I doesn\\\'t fit on the CharacterAlignment scale like the other ones do, as they are a different type altogether. Maybe we should have Types 0,A,B,C & D. At any rate, we can\\\'t be too technical. Because being an Anti Hero is in many ways like a medical condition, in that the individual doesn\\\'t always have all the classic \\\"symptons\\\" of each Type. It woud have to be a Type 0,1,...
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Type V\'s are Anti Heroes. What seperates them from a VillainProtagonist is that they fight the CompleteMonsters, and are often SelfishGood; when they do good and fight evil, it\'s not because they want to do the right thing. Examples of a Type V would include Riddick and [[OrderOfTheStick Belkar Bitterleaf]]. But, yes, Type II\'s are morally \'\'better\'\' than a Type I. A Type I doesn\'t fit on the CharacterAlignment scale like the other ones do, as they are a different type altogether. Maybe we should have Types 0,A,B,C & D. At any rate, we can\'t be too technical. Because being an Anti Hero is in many ways like a medical condition, in that the individual doesn\'t always have all the classic \
to:
Type V\\\'s are Anti Heroes. What seperates them from a VillainProtagonist is that they fight the CompleteMonsters, and are often SelfishGood; when they do good and fight evil, it\\\'s not because they want to do the right thing. Examples of a Type V would include Riddick and [[OrderOfTheStick Belkar Bitterleaf]]. But, yes, Type II\\\'s are morally \\\'\\\'better\\\'\\\' than a Type I. A Type I doesn\\\'t fit on the CharacterAlignment scale like the other ones do, as they are a different type altogether. Maybe we should have Types 0,A,B,C & D. At any rate, we can\\\'t be too technical. Because being an Anti Hero is in many ways like a medical condition, in that the individual doesn\\\'t always have all the classic \\\"symptons\\\" of each Type. It woud have to be a Type 0,1,...
Top