Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / IfYoureSoEvilEatThisKitten

Go To

[002] BritBllt Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The shooting began. J looked left and right, sizing up the targets while everyone else was firing wildly. Then he got a decisive look and took one shot. Then Zed questioned him on why Little Susie had to die. J gave his explanation, and then concluded with \
to:
The shooting began. J looked left and right, sizing up the targets while everyone else was firing wildly. Then he got a decisive look and took one shot. Then Zed questioned him on why Little Susie had to die. J gave his explanation, and then concluded with \\\"am I right, or do I owe her family an apology?\\\" Zed said nothing and walked off, and the next line is Zed telling K that J \\\"has a problem with authority\\\" - in other words, the answer wasn\\\'t wrong (and it makes sense that Zed questioned him on it, to make sure that J really understood \\\'\\\'why\\\'\\\' that was the right shot and didn\\\'t just get lucky), it was J\\\'s sarcastic tone that Zed had a problem with.

Seriously, why are you operating under the assumption that I don\\\'t know what I\\\'m doing? I have been editing this wiki for almost three years now. I think I have proven myself a damn good editor, so how about giving me the benefit of the doubt? If I wasn\\\'t 100% sure about something, \\\'\\\'I wouldn\\\'t be talking about it\\\'\\\'.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The shooting began. J looked left and right, sizing up the targets while everyone else was firing wildly. Then he got a decisive look and took one shot. Then Zed questioned him on why Little Susie had to die. J gave his explanation, and then concluded with \
to:
The shooting began. J looked left and right, sizing up the targets while everyone else was firing wildly. Then he got a decisive look and took one shot. Then Zed questioned him on why Little Susie had to die. J gave his explanation, and then concluded with \\\"am I right, or do I owe her family an apology?\\\" Zed said nothing and walked off, and the next line is Zed telling K that J \\\"has a problem with authority\\\" - in other words, the answer wasn\\\'t wrong (and it makes sense that Zed questioned him on it, to make sure that J really understood \\\'\\\'why\\\'\\\' that was the right shot and didn\\\'t just get lucky), it was J\\\'s sarcastic tone that Zed had a problem with.

Seriously, why do people operate under the assumption that I don\\\'t know what I\\\'m doing? I have been editing this wiki for almost three years now. I think I have proven myself a damn good editor, so how about giving me the benefit of the doubt? If I wasn\\\'t 100% sure about something, \\\'\\\'I wouldn\\\'t be talking about it\\\'\\\'.
Top