[018]
SpellBlade
Current Version
Changed line(s) 26 from:
n
\'\'[-edited to zap stuff I feel was redundant.-]\'\'
to:
\\\'\\\'[-Edited to zap stuff I feel was redundant.-]\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 24 from:
n
Please explain how you can objectively prove the complainers in general have jumped the shark.
to:
Please explain how you can objectively prove the complainers in general have jumped the shark.
\\\'\\\'[-edited to zap stuff I feel was redundant.-]\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'[-edited to zap stuff I feel was redundant.-]\\\'\\\'
Changed line(s) 18 from:
n
2. Who gets to decide what constitutes as over-simplification, and why do you single out this one particular example while the trope asks that we dismiss justifying edits that may or may not be true on principle, without research or discussion?
to:
Changed line(s) 19 from:
to:
2. I don\\\'t care about this one completely random example; most of the examples on the page assumes [[TheComplainerIsAlwaysWrong you can\\\'t actually dislike these changes listed works made.]] The \\\'\\\'entire page\\\'\\\' assumes the listed complaints can\\\'t be legitimate. As such, the same over-simplification argument you used could hypothetically be used to zap most of the page. From a neutral on-looker\\\'s point of view, the \\\'\\\'content\\\'\\\' of the example looks identical to the rest of the page, but it *does* look a bit bitter. I\\\'m confused as to why you singled out this one particular example, as opposed to rephrasing it. How many other examples on the page are going to get zapped because someone feels the complaints are legitimate?
Changed line(s) 21 from:
n
3. I don\'t care about this one completely random example; most of the examples on the page assumes [[TheComplainerIsAlwaysWrong you can\'t actually dislike these changes listed works made.]] The \'\'entire page\'\' assumes the listed complaints can\'t be legitimate. As such, the same over-simplification argument you used could hypothetically be used to zap most of the page. From a neutral on-looker\'s point of view, the \'\'content\'\' of the example looks identical to the rest of the page, but it *does* look a bit bitter. I\'m confused as to why you singled out this one particular example, as opposed to rephrasing it. How many other examples on the page are going to get zapped because someone feels the complaints are legitimate?
to:
