[002]
SomeGuy
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
We are not TheOtherWiki. This isn\'t true just in terms of ThereIsNoSuchThingAsNotability, but also of general form. Stuff like Obama winning the Nobel Prize, the specifics of the elections he was involved in and his political background, this is all stuff we can get on Wikipedia, and probably with better citations to boot. By contrast, someone on the TV Tropes wiki goes to pages expecting analysis of tropes in media, which I\'ve tried to outline to the best of my ability by cutting off the dry, encyclopedic information on the basis of it not being material that comes to mind when one thinks \
to:
We are not TheOtherWiki. This isn\\\'t true just in terms of ThereIsNoSuchThingAsNotability, but also of general form. Stuff like Obama winning the Nobel Prize, the specifics of the elections he was involved in and his political background, this is all stuff we can get on Wikipedia, and probably with better citations to boot. By contrast, someone on the TV Tropes wiki goes to pages expecting analysis of tropes in media, which I\\\'ve tried to outline to the best of my ability by emphasizing the image Obama conveys to the country, and keeping the page from getting too long by consequently cutting off the more dry, encyclopedic information.
In other words facts, impartial though they may be, are irrelevant to us if they don\\\'t impact Obama\\\'s public image, and they should be related to his image as such if they\\\'re going to be in the description. At least, that\\\'s my opinion- if you strongly and reasonably disagree, by all means revert the parts of the description you wish. I acknowledge that my rewrite was a bit of a departure and may have been a bit much given the page was only recently unlocked.
In other words facts, impartial though they may be, are irrelevant to us if they don\\\'t impact Obama\\\'s public image, and they should be related to his image as such if they\\\'re going to be in the description. At least, that\\\'s my opinion- if you strongly and reasonably disagree, by all means revert the parts of the description you wish. I acknowledge that my rewrite was a bit of a departure and may have been a bit much given the page was only recently unlocked.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
We are not TheOtherWiki. This isn\'t true just in terms of ThereIsNoSuchThingAsNotability, but also of general form. Stuff like Obama winning the Nobel Prize, the specifics of the elections he was involved in and his political background, this is all stuff we can get on Wikipedia, and probably with better citations to boot. By contrast, someone on the TV Tropes wiki goes to pages expecting analysis of tropes in media, which I\'ve tried to outline to the best of my ability, cutting off the dry, encyclopedic information as not being what someone is looking for if they\'re on the site.
to:
We are not TheOtherWiki. This isn\\\'t true just in terms of ThereIsNoSuchThingAsNotability, but also of general form. Stuff like Obama winning the Nobel Prize, the specifics of the elections he was involved in and his political background, this is all stuff we can get on Wikipedia, and probably with better citations to boot. By contrast, someone on the TV Tropes wiki goes to pages expecting analysis of tropes in media, which I\\\'ve tried to outline to the best of my ability by cutting off the dry, encyclopedic information on the basis of it not being material that comes to mind when one thinks \\\"TV Tropes\\\".
