Follow TV Tropes

Discussion History UsefulNotes / JosefStalin

Go To

[002] Jormungar Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
Mentioning historians is fine. I agree, how different people view or write about something is interesting information. I guess my main problem was ''ranking'' historians in-article. If you want to say,
to:
Mentioning historians is fine. I agree, how different people view or write about something is interesting information. My main problem was \'\'ranking\'\' historians in-article. If you want to say, \"Russian historians tend to paint Stalin in a more sympathetic light,\" that\'s fine rather than, \"Ignore Russian historians, they\'re all biased.\" I don\'t think that kind of ordering the reader should be in the article because it personalizes it too much.

I still think having large walls of text behind notes isn\'t what notes were intended for, but if you disagree I\'ll let it be.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
Mentioning historians is fine. I agree, how different people view or write about something is interesting information. I guess my main problem was ''ranking'' historians in-article. If you want to say,
to:
Mentioning historians is fine. I agree, how different people view or write about something is interesting information. I guess my main problem was \'\'ranking\'\' historians in-article. If you want to say, \"Russian historians tend to paint Stalin in a more sympathetic light,\" that\'s fine rather than, \"Ignore Russian historians, they\'re all biased.\" I don\'t think that kind of ordering the reader should be in the article because it personalizes it too much.

I still think having large walls of text behind notes isn\'t what notes were intended for, but if you disagree I\'ll let it be.
Top

How well does it match the trope?

Example of:

/

Media sources:

/

Report