Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History UsefulNotes / PoliticalIdeologies

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Monarchism is too locally contained and co-eval with existing ideologies...either Burkean slow-and-steady-don't-rock-the-boat conservatism or Joseph de Maistre neo-Divine Right...to really make sense to give it a separate entry.
to:
Monarchism is too locally contained and co-eval with existing ideologies...either Burkean slow-and-steady-don\'t-rock-the-boat conservatism or Joseph de Maistre neo-Divine Right...to really make sense to give it a separate entry. And yes there are some monarchists who can be considered socialists, after all even Stalin wasn\'t entirely on board with taking down the Yugoslavian king. While Churchill was such a fan of Greek monarchy that he backed the Greek fascists and Nazi collaborators to reinstate them as PuppetKing for NATO. So that\'s more {{Realpolitik}} than ideology.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I mean we can discuss the ideology of monarchism but we would have to cite Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan, DivineRightOfKings and Salamanca school doctrine of {{Tyrannicide}} and maybe deal old Machiavelli and ''Literature/ThePrince''. All of them are interesting and relevant but not in terms of modern political ideologies that are still operating and relevant today and part of contemporary discourse. It would be sensible dealing historically. And monarchism would take us away from the West, we'd have to deal with Saudi Arabia, with Bhutan, with maybe the Tibetan GovernmentInExile, it's way too much to deal with.
to:
I mean we can discuss the ideology of monarchism but we would have to cite Thomas Hobbes\' Leviathan, DivineRightOfKings and Salamanca school doctrine of {{Tyrannicide}} and maybe deal old Machiavelli and \'\'Literature/ThePrince\'\'. All of them are interesting and relevant but not in terms of modern political ideologies that are still operating and relevant today and part of contemporary discourse. It would be sensible dealing historically. And monarchism would take us away from the West, we\'d have to deal with Saudi Arabia, with Bhutan, with maybe the Tibetan GovernmentInExile, it\'s way too much to deal with.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
And in the case of Spain and Juan Carlos you have a whole part of history that's not being told there... [[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/apr/25/baltasar-garzon-spain-franco since the bad Franco days]] are still not openly discussed and Juan Carlos' constitutional democracy was a kind of political compromise to let bygones be bygones not unlike America in 1876, you know peace and order for the doxa in place of justice and truth. So I don't know if we have a political ideology of monarchism in there, or something entirely local and specific to Spanish history.
to:
And in the case of Spain and Juan Carlos you have a whole part of history that\'s not being told there... [[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/apr/25/baltasar-garzon-spain-franco since the bad Franco days]] are still not openly discussed and Juan Carlos\' constitutional democracy was a kind of political compromise to let bygones be bygones not unlike America in 1876, you know peace and order for the doxa in place of justice and truth. So I don\'t know if we have a political ideology of monarchism in there, or something entirely local and specific to Spanish history.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
I mean if we have monarchism we could also talk about theocracy...we'd have to cover Iran, saudi arabia again, and maybe Tibet. And it's difficult to do so because those regimes are not open societies so we don't have a sense of what's going on and what those ideologies actually mean.
to:
I mean if we have monarchism we could also talk about theocracy...we\'d have to cover Iran, saudi arabia again, and maybe Tibet. And it\'s difficult to do so because those regimes are not open societies so we don\'t have a sense of what\'s going on and what those ideologies actually mean.
Top