Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History YMMV / Ghostbusters2016

Go To

[002] Freshmeat Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, a more apt comparison would be HeteronormativeCrusader and RapeCultureCrusader. Or RapeCultureBeliever if Crusader has too many negative connotations. Or whatever else term that seems agreeable. And that would be all that's needed. It's the ''character'' that believes this thing. It's the ''character'' that is, say, a ''KnifeNut'' - not us! (we think knives are dangerous!) It's the ''character'' that's a FourStarBadass, not us. And so on.
to:
Well, a more apt comparison would be HeteronormativeCrusader and RapeCultureCrusader. Or RapeCultureBeliever if Crusader has too many negative connotations. Or whatever else term that seems agreeable. And that would be all that\'s needed. It\'s the \'\'character\'\' that believes this thing. It\'s the \'\'character\'\' that is, say, a \'\'KnifeNut\'\' - not us! (we think knives are dangerous!) It\'s the \'\'character\'\' that\'s a FourStarBadass, not us. And so on.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But a RapeCultureBeliever trope would get stamped with a
to:
But a RapeCultureBeliever trope would get stamped with a \"No real life examples please!\" disclaimer before it launched anyway. And rape culture in and of itself could - maybe - exist as a UsefulNotes page. But let\'s not talk hypothetics until someone feels the need to create a YKKTW.

\"It\'s not our job to make things easier for people who dislike an idea or concept.\"

Nor is it our job to make things easier for people who like a idea or concept. We try to voice things as neutrally as possible. If it starts leaning too heavily either way, something has to give.

And now I\'m out since we\'ve already agreed to a disclaimer tag two posts ago. Anything else is just white noise.

(ninja edit: unless the disclaimer itself fall under WeaselWords - mod ruling?)
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, a more apt comparison would be HeteronormativeCrusader and RapeCultureCrusader. Or RapeCultureBeliever if Crusader has too many negative connotations. Or whatever else term that seems agreeable. And that would be all that's needed. It's the ''character'' that believes this thing. It's the ''character'' that is, say, a ''KnifeNut'' - not us! (we think knives are dangerous!) It's the ''character'' that's a FourStarBadass, not us. And so on.
to:
Well, a more apt comparison would be HeteronormativeCrusader and RapeCultureCrusader. Or RapeCultureBeliever if Crusader has too many negative connotations. Or whatever else term that seems agreeable. And that would be all that\'s needed. It\'s the \'\'character\'\' that believes this thing. It\'s the \'\'character\'\' that is, say, a \'\'KnifeNut\'\' - not us! (we think knives are dangerous!) It\'s the \'\'character\'\' that\'s a FourStarBadass, not us. And so on.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
But a RapeCultureBeliever trope would get stamped with a
to:
But a RapeCultureBeliever trope would get stamped with a \"No real life examples please!\" disclaimer before it launched anyway. And rape culture in and of itself could - maybe - exist as a UsefulNotes page. But let\'s not talk hypothetics until someone feels the need to create a YKKTW.

\"It\'s not our job to make things easier for people who dislike an idea or concept.\"

Nor is it our job to make things easier for people who like a idea or concept. We try to voice things as neutrally as possible. If it starts leaning too heavily either way, something has to give.

And now I\'m out since we\'ve already agreed to a disclaimer tag two posts ago. Anything else is just white noise.
Top