Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Ask the Tropers is for:
- General questions about the wiki, how it works, and how to do things.
- Reports of problems with wiki articles, or requests for help with wiki articles.
- Reports of misbehavior or abuse by other tropers.
Ask the Tropers is not for:
- Help identifying a trope. See TropeFinder.
- Help identifying a work. See MediaFinder.
- Asking if a trope example is valid. See the Trope Talk forum.
- Proposing new tropes. See TropeLaunchPad.
- Making bug reports. See QueryBugs.
- Asking for new wiki features. See QueryWishlist.
- Chatting with other tropers. See our forums.
- Reporting problems with advertisements. See this forum topic.
- Reporting issues on the forums. Send a Holler instead.
Ask the Tropers:
openSchindler's List as an example of White Man's Burden Film
A while ago Mark2000
added Schindler's List as an example on the trope page of White Man's Burden, which was removed for the entry itself being objectively inaccurate, they also added Mighty Whitey to that film's page and edit warred about it until it was deleted a second time.
Flash forward and LadyEros
has added the example to the White Man's Burden.
Now personally I think the trope doesn't apply, for the reason that The Holocaust was targeting people who were white Europeans too, even if the rhetoric back then portrayed them as sub-human. And also by the editors' logic then any instance when a privileged individual helps an oppressed group would be this trope.
What do you think?
Migrated to Chloe Jessica!
opensomething missing
this entry is from Transhuman Treachery:
- It happens regularly with Dead Apostles: no matter if they turn on their own with the use of magecraft or are turned by the bite of another Dead Apostle, a True Ancestor or even Brunestud of the Crimson Moon itself, by the time the process ends they see themselves as superior to humanity (or saw the Dead Apostle as superior even before, in the case of those who turned themselves) and have no problem at feeding on them. So far, there are only five Subversions: Zelretch, Merem Solomon and Satsuki were powerful enough to skip the usual long and torturing process and their personalities remained the same (even Merem Solomon's adoration of Brunestud fits in, as it was the only one to treat him as a person and turned him as an act of mercy, even giving him a few pointers to better live as a Dead Apostle), Gransurg Blackmoore was a human who had decided to serve Brunestud after being crushed by him in battle and turned himself because it would be more appropriate, and Enhance Defied this by willing himself into retaining most of his humanity before starting to hunt down the other Dead Apostles.
there's, uh, there's no work here. none of those potholes go to whatever work this is. this seems a grave oversight.
openReporting a troper
lugia1 is deleting a whole bunch of commented-out ZCEs with no edit reasons (see A Boy and His X and Abhorrent Admirer). They have also made some grammar and capitalization mistakes, as seen on Abandon Ship and the subpages of Get a Hold of Yourself, Man! (which I fixed). Requesting a revert on the removal of commented-out examples; they're left like that so people can add context, and deleting them is rather rude.
Edited by rjd1922openPossible ROCEJ Violation
On Trivia.Chuggaaconroy, there's an example under Missing Episode involving a video featuring ProJared being removed due to a scandal involving him that started a few months ago that was originally read this:
- One of his Pikmin 3 Mission Mode episodes was removed as of May 2019, as the episode in question had Pro Jared as his guest. This was because said guest star was in deep trouble for...controversial reasons involving Jared cheating on his wife.
However, machop changed it to this:
- One of his Pikmin 3 Mission Mode episodes was removed as of May 2019, as the episode in question had Pro Jared as his guest. This was because said guest star was then-currently being accused by people who might've thought Jared was harassing certain groups. Fortunately, those claims were proven as false as of September 2019 by Jared himself. The video is still currently missing, however.
However, people are debating whether ProJared was really telling the truth or not, and I fear this could lead to an edit war. I think this example should be rewritten to be more neutral and should warn about ROCEJ like this:
- A Pikmin 3 Mission Mode episode featuring Pro Jared as a guest was removed as of May 2019, following allegations of Jared cheating on his wife. And we'll leave it at that.
openVideos not showing?
According to recent videos, there's a video for Never Speak Ill of the Dead approved.
However there's no video on the trope page itself.
openTitle Question Western Animation
I was in the process of making a trope page for the Herself The Elf cartoon, but am unsure what to call it. Wikipedia lists it as The Magic of Herself the Elf or The Special Magic of Herself the Elf, the latter being its onscreen name, and while checking out its wicks other tropers listed it as just Herself the Elf, which was also the name of the toyline. Any ideas? I was thinking of just going with Herself the Elf since that's the general name of the franchise but am unsure. Thanks!
open Single-Target Smiler / A Different Brand of Smile
Woops, was informed that this kind of post needs to go in Trope Finder instead of Ask The Tropers. Just posted it there as well. You live and learn :)
—-
Hello tropers!
I was wondering if there's a trope for a character who doesn't usually smile (or only smiles in a scary / intimidating way) but for whatever reason WILL smile sincerely at only one other character - the character they have a crush on, the Morality Pet, a family member, whatever. It always touches my heart when a grumpy and / or emotionally distant and / or scary character has a different brand of smile for a specific character that's in some way close to their heart. (Doesn't have to be in a romantic way).
I read through the Smile Tropes page and the Heartwarming Moments page and didn't find anything that fit the above description perfectly. The only tropes I could find that sort of come close to what I mean are:
1. Smile of Approval. However, this trope focuses on the specific reason for the smile given (approval) and I found myself thinking it might be nice if there was a trope page collecting ALL examples of characters who don't usually smile giving a sincere smile to another character for WHATEVER reason, be it approval or love or anything else. (I'm soppy, so sue me XD)
2. When She Smiles. However, this trope focuses more on how other characters in-universe react to the (rarely seen) smile. The trope I'm talking about (which of course might not....actually...exist) focuses more on the smile being directed at a single character, and it's not important whether that character notices they are the recipient of that Rare Smile ™ or not, or what they think about being the recipient of this smile. I guess what I'm talking about has vibes of Single Target Sexuality but in this case it would be Single Target Affection.
I also checked the O.O.C. is serious business page, but all tropes collected here seem to focus on negative things and how characters act when there's impending danger, so I don't think I'm gonna find what I'm looking for there, either.
Defrosting Ice Queen / King might fit the bill in some respects, but this trope isn't narrowed down to only smiles, and also includes an element of time (the whole defrosting as characters get to know each other better set-up) and character development (going from haughty / frozen to kinder). The trope I mean - only showing a sincere smile to one other character - could also apply if a character stays the same personality-wise from the beginning to the end of the storyline they're in.
What do you all think? Do you know any tropes who fit what I'm talking about? If not, could there be some merit in starting a trope page like this collecting examples from all media, or is the defenition too vague? (Or, for that matter, too narrow because it focuses only on smiling?) Do you know any examples of usually non-smiling characters giving sincere smiles to only one other character?
If this trope doesn't already have a page and I just didn't succeed in finding it, I was thinking it might be fun to call it it A Different Brand of Smile, or maybe Single-Target Smiler. It might also have some merit to link this trope in the also see / closely associated with section of Tsundere, Defrosting Ice Queen / King, etc.
Sorry for the ridiculously long post and please excuse any grammatical errors, English isn't my first language. Would love to hear any and all recommendations of tropes that might fit my description and what you all think about possibly starting a trope page for this!
Edited by m4y_zaeopenRepeated Trope Misuse and Edit Warring
On Characters.The Rising Of The Shield Hero, johnnysevens7 added And Then What? as an example, stating that even if one of the show’s antagonists had succeeded, then it was likely that things would have gone from bad to worse for themselves and the rest of the characters in the setting. I removed the example because it was Fridge Logic; this isn't a point being made within the story itself (the trope is when one character asks another what comes after their master plan and the schemer has no answer), it's a viewer's speculation about where the plot MIGHT have gone if the anagonist's plan had worked as they wished.
Two months later, jonnysevens7 re-added the trope with pretty much the same argument as before with no discussion. He has recently added another similar example stating the same thing about a different antagonist on the show.
As far as I can tell, Jonny is technically edit-warring and also ignoring both edit reasons as well as continuously misusing a trope.
Edited by NubianSatyressopenChaotic evil automatically a YMMV trope? Music
Was editing the page for Razia's Shadow and tried adding the Chaotic Evil trope to the list of examples, but it automatically turned into a YMMV trope instead of a normal bullet point trope. Is Chaotic Evil automatically a YMMV / subjective interpretation trope? I would have thought if the character being described never has his motivations for an evil deed explained in canon apart from "because he wants to", that would count as Chaotic Evil, no YMMV about it. (For context: the character in question is Barayas the spider, who in the song "The Spider and the Lamps" from the musical Razia's Shadow encourages another character to literally Set the World on Fire without apparently gaining anything from it himself. Lyrics of the song here: https://genius.com/Forgive-durden-the-spider-and-the-lamps-lyrics)
Is there any way to sumbit the Chaotic Evil trope to the examples list without turning into a YMMV trope? Or should I just submit it to the YMMV page?
openThe issue of YMMV.TVTokyo
YMMV.TV Tokyo is a YMMV page regarding a Creator (a TV station to be exact). While I agree the Germans Love David Hasselhoff must be removed, I'm unsure about the two "memetic" entries. The things is, those memes relates to the editorial preferences of the station—in this case, a general aversion to news—so it could be associated with a work, or you can is is the work itself, on a more vague sense. But for this particular policy, is it a work?
Also note that beyond that, the existence of that meme is proven beyond doubt.
openHe Also Did misuse
Tangentially related to MasterHero's ATT about Relationship Voice Actor, I've noticed an increasing number of Trivia/ pages that feature misuse of He Also Did. Per the page itself, "These are examples of well-known works (not obscure experiments) of creators that are so far out of their perceived niche that often times people don't immediately realize the person behind it." Things like Mel Brooks, the same guy who gave us The Producers, Blazing Saddles, and Young Frankenstein, also being the producer of The Elephant Man and The Fly (1986). Or iconic 20th century science fiction author Ray Bradbury working on the script for the John Huston film of Moby-Dick.
Thing is, I've seen a growing number of Trivia/ pages where He Also Did is essentially treated as a successor to Hey Its That Guy, sometimes for performers and sometimes for creators; in particular, I've seen multiple pages for television series where there are entries for seemingly everyone who wrote or directed an episode with the names of other series they've created or for which they've written or directed, almost all of which are in the same genre (for example, a page for a sitcom simply lists the other sitcoms for which the series' writers have written).
Should a cleanup thread be started to address this misuse? (It looks as though most of them were added by the same troper
, so sending a PM is presumably also in order.)
openUnnecessary swearing and/or WordCruft?
I was perusing the Draconic Abomination page, and noticed the entry for Dragon Project seems a little excessive, particularly in terms of vulgarity. Don't want to come across as a Bluenose Bowdlerizer, so I figured I'd raise the subject here. Here's the entry in question:
- In Dragon Project, the Dark Oracle Spear Behemoth is Vile Mezarenda, a winged serpentine dragon with an eye at the end of its tail and a massive sinister eye where its face is supposed to be. This "thing", along with the Light Burst Greatsword Behemoth, Ruthless Illugion, serve as guardians for an abandoned dragon sanctuary that doubles as an archive. Its mere appearance was unnerving enough, but it has some Lovecraftian Superpowers up its sleeve, such as summoning shadowy spikes that trap unlucky Hunters to their demise or breaking its own FUCKING EYE OFF to buff itself, leaving behind an empty eye-socket with glowing Tron Lines. The nightmare doesn't stop there, as the empty eye-socket occasionally drips dark black puddles of blood that deal damage when stepped on. The worst part? One of the snake dragon's lovely attacks is to summon the aforementioned spikes, turn its eye into a makeshift black hole, and crawl around the battlefield in frightening speeds while sucking up any unfortunate Hunter within its eye-socket before slamming its head against the ground, strong enough to border on a One-Hit KO. It doesn't help that a bug will turn the unfortunate Hunter into an invisible yet frail spectre that cannot deal any damage yet can receive damage until their demise.note Thankfully the bug can be fixed by changing your weapons or disconnecting and reconnecting the game.
openDispute on YMMV.Mulan
There is a dispute between myself and Catcher In The Wry on YMMV.Mulan. In short, I removed an entry he wrote, and he took offense to it, PMing me to say he was "annoyed" and that he would take it to a mod. He has not restored the entry, so it's not an Edit War yet, but from the tone of his PM, and of the entry I deleted, I figure it's better to get here first.
The entry was for Unintentionally Unsympathetic and Unintentionally Sympathetic; the first I deleted because it was, to my judgment, factually inaccurate — it stated that Shang gave no instruction (despite the Make A Man Out Of You montage showing him leading the group in exercises, as well as the group improving, clearly implying that his teaching is effective), and that all he did was demand the recruits like Mulan perform expert level feats and scowl when they failed. Basically, the entry seems to assume that the actions shown in the aforementioned montage are literally the only things Shang did with the group, and therefore Shang is an unreasonable bully for not teaching Mulan anything and then being annoyed that she isn't an Instant Expert.
It also had indentation issues, with a second level bulletpoint that just further expounds on Shang's supposed failures.
The second I deleted because it's based entirely on the first — saying Obstructive Bureaucrat Chi Fu is sympathetic because he's right to be critical of Shang's alleged incompetence. As the first entry is factually inaccurate, the second one based entirely on that should also go.
So far he has not yet PMed me over removing his Alternative Character Interpretation (which I deleted because it doesn't actually explain the alternate interpretation, it just sort of trails off with a parenthetical about how what Chi Fu did was justified), but given his reaction to my removal of his other entry, I expect it's forthcoming.
In all, the entries appear to be based less on the content of the work, and more on this troper's personal dislike for the character Shang, which is in turn based on a factually inaccurate understanding of the movie.
openEdit War on YMMV/Super Smash Bros Ultimate
In YMMV.Super Smash Bros Ultimate I removed an addition to the sole Ending Fatigue example by wrpen99 due to it being more about an example of That One Achievement, which is already listed on the page, and because it was on a separate bullet instead being added onto the example itself, I noted both in the Edit Reason, though I neglected to also mention the complaining nature of the edit. I also sent them an Example Indentation notifier before the removal.
They readded their edit, again on a separate bullet, with the part that was already under That One Achievement removed, but what remains still doesn't have anything to do with Ending Fatigue and reads more like complaining about an Ear Worm.
Edited by homogenizedopenRecap/CodeLyoko Western Animation
For Code Lyoko, I need help getting tropes for all the episodes, plus getting pages for the rest of the red linked episodes (and get XANA Awakens a page for itself (both parts 1 and 2), for crying out loud). I can't do this on my own. Can someone help me?
Edited by Teenlyokofan7777openSociopathic Soldier
Some guy edited the description trope and replaces a few important categories. Should we revert them back?. His reasoning to edit it seems self-righteous and based on his own value
Edited by jun_kagamiopenIs this ROCEJ?
I found this example on YMMV.Battle Bots under The Scrappy.
- Chomp has quickly gotten into this zone for several reasons. The first being the fact that builder Zoe Stephenson is often used to push the "women can be just as good at Battlebots" agenda down the throats of viewers. Moreover is the fact that Chomp won against The Disk 'O Inferno despite being dominated the whole time because of the skewed new rules (see Scrappy Mechanic below). It's telling when the audience booed when Chomp won.
I highlighted the specific part in bold here because it seems to be complaining about the builder Zoe herself rather than the robot she built. Is this Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment?
openFound on WesternAnimation/Driven to Suicide
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/DrivenToSuicide/WesternAnimation
- My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic:
- In the episode "No Second Prances", a very distraught Trixie Lulamoon attempts to perform a dangerous magic trick involving launching herself into a manticore's mouth alone. Her assistant Starlight Glimmer would have teleported her to safety, but Starlight learned the only reason that Trixie acted nicely towards her was so that Trixie could one-up Twilight Sparkle. Even worse, when Trixie reveals that she genuinely likes Starlight, she makes the mistake of adding in that "beating Twilight Sparkle is just a bonus!", which only angers Starlight more. Thankfully, Twilight is able to convince Starlight to help Trixie just in time to make the stunt go off without a hitch. While Word of God has confirmed that Trixie going on with the show was not a suicide attempt — there are a few subtle cues in the episode that make it clear Trixie's life wasn't in danger — it was still enough for it to be a popular fanon due to Trixie's Friendless Background.
So... not driven to suicide, then.
Remove?

I made a Trope Finder thread
asking about a trope regarding the heroes earning their happy ending, only for some new threat to come along threatening to destroy everything they worked so hard for that they once again take up arms and combat it. partner555 suggested Happy Ending Override, to which I explained that was only for sequels where it happened inbetween instalments where the heroes fallied, and Tropers/{{4tell0life4}} doubled down on it being Happy Ending Override in conjunction with Immediate Sequel. Happy Ending Override describes itself as the following, emphasis mine:
My query is about works whose sequels, continuations, what-have-you start off in the peace the previous work ended at, and it is in this work that the new threat comes in and tries to ruin it. I feel there's some sort of miscommunication going on, and how both of them seem so sure it's Happy Ending Override makes me wonder how the trope is being used off-page.
Edited by Crossover-Enthusiast