Have a question about how the TVTropes wiki works? No one knows this community better than the people in it, so ask away! Ask the Tropers is the page you come to when you have a question burning in your brain and the support pages didn't help.
It's not for everything, though. For a list of all the resources for your questions, click here. You can also go to this Directory thread
for ongoing cleanup projects.
Ask the Tropers is for:
- General questions about the wiki, how it works, and how to do things.
- Reports of problems with wiki articles, or requests for help with wiki articles.
- Reports of misbehavior or abuse by other tropers.
Ask the Tropers is not for:
- Help identifying a trope. See TropeFinder.
- Help identifying a work. See MediaFinder.
- Asking if a trope example is valid. See the Trope Talk forum.
- Proposing new tropes. See TropeLaunchPad.
- Making bug reports. See QueryBugs.
- Asking for new wiki features. See QueryWishlist.
- Chatting with other tropers. See our forums.
- Reporting problems with advertisements. See this forum topic.
- Reporting issues on the forums. Send a Holler instead.
Ask the Tropers:
openNever Live It Down misuse?
NeverLiveItDown.Animated Films
- From the BIONICLE films:
- The very concept of the Turaga. Originally priest-like figures who served as village elders, leaders, guardians of old legends and secret histories, they also had abilities like limited control over elements, mask powers and staffs that doubled as tools or weapons, which helped them protect their people for a thousand years. The movies, in an effort to "humanize" the characters and simplify the franchise, took an overly literal approach to the word "elder" and portrayed Turaga as hunched-over, geriatric and nearly helpless, using their staves as walking sticks. Fridge Logic also kicks in when you realize they're not actually older than those around them, just more experienced. This portrayal even extended to the Rahaga from the third film. While weak and small compared to Toa warriors, they were meant to be very capable and agile — Turaga Vakama's original promo image even shows him sprinting. Since the movies though, Turaga were almost always seen as "elderly robots" and weaklings who avoided any action, rather than as capable but not Toa-level protectors.
- Sidorak was a capable warlord too preoccupied with conquest to realize his viceroy Roodaka was planning to betray him and that his Giant Spider troops feared rather than respected him. The film Web of Shadows, a heavily compressed adaptation of a year's worth of books and comics, focused solely on Sidorak's incompetent and clueless side, turning him into such a pathetic Memetic Loser that even the official writer himself would later adopt this portrayal and retconned Sidorak's earlier accomplishments, crediting them to Roodaka instead.
- Kiina from The Legend Reborn only yelled "Yoo-hoo!" a couple of times but fans would have you believe that's all she's ever done. The comics and books gave a completely different character to Kiina and explained away her movie behavior as merely a play she had put on because she realized her actual personality (a spiteful, short tempered and deeply cynical warrior) was insufferable. But apparently no one read the comics and books.
- Tuma from the same film went down in history as a laughably ineffective, 2nd rate villain who rivaled Sidorak in stupidity and had a giant ego with nothing to back it up, despite every other story material going way out of its way to portray him as a very competent and even somewhat relatable Tragic Villain. The film never touches on his deep backstory, showing him as a one dimensional oaf, and people only remember him for his self-given moniker of "Da mighty Tuma!"
Never Live It Down is about unfair exaggerations. If it had tangible effects/changes like described, this sounds more like Audience-Coloring Adaptation. Move?
I also asked Is this an example
.
openThe Launch Pad Incident
Hey, so this is Kryppuk‘s older sister speaking.
I will be the one responding to this whole disaster on the Launch Pad page because I don’t want them to get even more upset over this than they already did. I don’t know much about how this page works and I don‘t know where a post like this would go nor do I know if the formatting will be functional, and I apologize if it‘s not.
But I feel like this is something that needs to be explained, so I‘m asking you to hear me out.
My sibling(who is not comfortable with their gender being revealed online, so I‘ll try to keep it neutral) loves analyzing fictional stories and characters and wants to become a writer themselves one day. They are shy and don’t share this passion with a lot of people. And they loved the articles on this page since they were a young teen because of how much of an in-depth look they provided. They looked up to you guys, they really didn‘t mean to mess things up or offend people.
It took them a lot of time and courage to finally write down one of their ideas and actually post it in here. Finally having something that’s ready to post meant a lot to them, they wanted to make sure it was done right, they even had me spellcheck it twice because they didn’t want there to be any errors.
And the text looked fine to me. I‘m not too familiar with this page aside from what they showed me, but I have played some of the games mentioned in the article, so I was able to understand what it was about. And get this: I told them to just post it and not be so nervous about it because surely, your first post ever doesn’t have to be perfect and people would understand that it’s the thought that counts because everything else can still be improved afterwards.
Needless to say, I regret giving them this sort of encouragement.
Cut to about an hour later and they’re a nervous wreck, panicking and trying to „fix“ their article, which just seemed to mess it up more. I know for a fact that the apostrophes did read properly on the original post, so they must have gotten corrupted in one of the following edits. There also seemed to be some interface issues (It may have had something to do with us using a tablet rather than a real computer.) where the text field was partially covered by parts of the page that just added to the stress. I barely managed to get them to let it go for the night.
I don‘t think anyone is really to blame on this one as there were several aspects factoring into it, but it was not pretty and it took such a toll on my sibling‘s mental well-being, they are now considering quitting the page altogether.
It’s true that the formatting of their post didn’t look very good on this page. It was fine in the original document they wrote it in, but evidently, it just didn’t translate well. The numbers for one were underneath each other, not besides each other. This didn’t look like it was going to be a problem in the initial posting interface, (which was incredibly narrow by the way, the scrolling for the final spellcheck was a pain) but well, turns out that it is.
But honestly, that’s an innocent mistake, isn’t it? They didn’t know what their text would look like on the actual page because they had never written an article for it. In fact, they knew this would likely be an issue and asked for help.
It’s not even like they just typed random stuff directly into the text field without double checking it, their only crime was that they weren’t sure how to use coding, which I‘m sure all of you were perfectly versed in the first time you posted anything on this page, but they weren’t.
They knew it wasn’t going to be perfect right away and wanted to improve in this regard, but that wasn’t their main point. They wanted to talk to people about this idea they had. They didn’t think the formatting would mean more to people than the actual content of the article and frankly, neither did I.
Turns out it apparently does. I wish I‘d be able to tell them that they just misinterpreted the situation, but no, it really looks like people legitimately weren’t even reading what they actually wrote, with one person telling them to „just tell them what the trope is about“ only to edit their comment admitting they hadn’t even read the part right towards the beginning of the post that literally consists of a numerical list of exactly that. I‘m sorry, poor formatting or not, that’s just plain rude. This kind of criticism is not helping anyone. Both I and my sibling know that not everybody acts like that and that these comments aren‘t personal attacks in any way nor were they the only factor in their panic attack yesterday, but that doesn‘t change what happened.
Now I don’t see myself in any position to judge the article the same way people on this page can, but I did notice that a lot of the examples my sibling gave are not found in the examples section on the „Hijacked by Ganon“ page, which people claimed it was too similar to despite my sibling‘s best efforts to differentiate the two. If their suggestion was redundant, then I would have expected the other page to have at least more than half of the same examples.
Now I don’t see myself in any position to judge the article the same way people on this page can, but I did notice that a lot of the examples my sibling gave are not found in the examples section on the „Hijacked by Ganon“ page, which people claimed it was too similar to despite my sibling‘s best efforts to differentiate the two. If their suggestion was redundant, then I would have expected the other page to have at least most of the same examples.
There are also some things that I just don’t understand, like how is Ganon being used in a page name fine while referencing Bowser is problematic and needs to be replaced with „Big Bad“? I personally don’t have much involvement with this page and don’t know the definition of a „Big Bad“, but I do know who Bowser is, as well as that he is a common culprit of the phenomenon my sibling was describing. If the goal is to make the title more understandable for outsiders, surely it would be more helpful to reference franchises most people are familiar with rather than the internal terminology of articles that people who aren’t active on this page haven’t read?
I would be interested in hearing the explanations behind those since my sibling can’t explain them to me, but that’s just my two cents on the situation.
And before anyone thinks I‘m just some entitled Karen wanting to speak to the manager, this is not about my sibling’s suggestion being rejected and I’m not looking to change the fact that it was. In fact, I don’t think they ever actually expected it to be accepted. They just wanted to write something into the forum to get in touch with people who seemingly shared their passion for fiction. Having people complain about their foreign quotation marks and having the names of bad writing tropes hurled at them on their very first post was not exactly what they planned.
I know some of you will say that they shouldn’t have written a page suggestion for that, and you may be right, but some people, like my sibling, have trouble making connections just for the sake of making connections. They do much better bonding with people over activities, like, let’s say, writing an article on a topic they’re passionate about, getting feedback on how to improve it and talking to people about the contents of the article.
I don‘t think they would have written a page suggestion if they knew of another place on the page to do this kind of stuff. Maybe that one suggestion in the comments about having a „beginner score“ that goes up when making approved additions to pages and allows them to legitimately suggest new pages (completely independent from just bouncing off ideas) only after they‘ve collected the experience to make them formally acceptable to the general public really would be worth looking into for the future.
„Just do it.“ is not a piece of advice my sibling is going to take from me again any time soon, even if the situation seems as harmless as making your first post on a page you really like. Which is a shame because in my opinion, that is something they should follow. They have many good ideas yet never make anything of them because they keep backing out. And now the one time they didn’t, it became an absolutely miserable experience for them.
I‘m sure they’ll get over it, they‘re just very anxious right now. They usually know better than to let stuff on the internet get to them, but this time, it was in a community they really looked up to and that they thought they might fit in with. They met their heroes and it was not in the way they had hoped for. This just went out of hand for them and they panicked, emotionally jumping to the conclusion that everyone hated them and their ideas.
This might be the last post written with this account, which is sad because it’s also one of the first, but in the end, it might be better this way. I know they said they wanted to fix their post, but I think it‘s best for them to not deal with anything right now. They‘re not fixing it not because they don‘t care or don‘t want to, but because they need to calm down and get their mind off of things. Don‘t worry, I don‘t think they‘ll actually quit the page entirely, they just need to take a break for a while.
I do apologize for ending on such a somber note. I‘m not exactly the linguistic talent in this family, I just think it’s important to communicate clearly. You‘re looked up to so much more than you know and I know how awkward this can be. Just keep up the good work.
Thank you for reading.
openReclassification of the AK-12 from Rare to Cool Guns
In light of the fact that Russia has finally managed to adopt the AK-12 into mainline service, should it be moved from Rare Guns status and into more conventional Cool Guns status?
The actual example itself also highlights this fact, so I question the current validity of its "rare" status.
Edited by TsierraopenIs This Allowed? Anime
The quote page for Neon Genesis Evangelion includes several quotes from influential figures such as Kurt Vonnegut and Jean-Paul Sartre. It seems to me that these quotes are here primarily to comment on the main themes and philosophies of Evangelion, but of course, the quotes do not directly mention Evangelion itself.
Please note that I only have basic knowledge of Evangelion, as I have not watched the anime. If these quotes are directly referenced within the anime, forgive me. But the quote page does not clarify this, so if this is indeed not the case, would this be breaking the rules?
openWhere would this scene fit? Western Animation
In an episode The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron, Boy Genius, Jimmy asks Goddard to use x-ray on Cindy's clothes when she's accused of stealing one of Sheen's Ultra Lord figures, prompting Carl to avert his gaze, Sheen to look on in excitement, and Cindy herself to furiously slap Jimmy across in the face at that suggestion.
Would that fit into Pervert Revenge Mode (even though the x-raying didn't actually happen), Power Perversion Potential, or somewhere else?
openDragalia Lost character info
Over time, the Characters.Dragalia Lost subpages seem to have gradually grown to include more and more character stats on them. As of now, each character has listed:
- Voice actors
- Element (only for main characters and alternate versions, as characters are already sorted by element to begin with)
- Rarity
- Unit Type
- Weapon Type
- Co-Ability
- Chain Co-Ability
- Shareable Skill
- Debut
I really think most of these are out of place for the site; with the abilities and skills turning into Walkthrough Mode. And the text takes a bunch of space, getting much worse if a character has multiple versions to document (see Characters.Dragalia Lost Main Characters for the worst of it).
I'm tempted to just take a chainsaw to this stuff myself, but I'm worried that it'll just be put back and head toward an edit war. And I could use some input on what stays and what goes.
openAn example violating administrivia?
On TierInducedScrappy.LowTiers I found this example:
Every character besides yourself in King Arthur & the Knights of Justice on SNES. They were the definition of dead weight and could barely kill a bottom level rat.
Does this violate the Examples Are Not General rule?
Edited by ATricksterArtistopenEdit War on Characters/FireEmblemThreeHousesEdelgard
Edit page history link
for Fire Emblem: Three Houses – Edelgard.
RedHunter543
deleted the Dark Messiah entry on Edelgard's character page for the following reason: "Edelgard does not fit the criteria to be a dark messiah."
Mei-may
restored the entry for the following reason: "Didn't cite which criteria she lacks to be not be this trope. And a DM is a villain with savior-delusions, has a utopian vision of peace and prospect, knight templar tendencies, has pet the dog moments but ruthless enough to sacrifice the dog, has loyal followers and generally acts/has good intentions, etc. Which all fit Edelgard."
Redhunter 543 deleted the entry again, making this into an Edit War for the following reason: "Edelgard does not present herself to be a holy savior to be a Dark Messiah, she's more knight templar than this trope. Additionally, she does not inspire fanatism in people aside from Hubert. The rest of the Eagles can turn on her for example"
I read the page for Dark Messiah and agree with Mei-may that Edelgard qualifies, but more voices should be heard to determine if Edelgard is indeed a DM.
openSpoiler Image on character page
So I was checking on Lucifer (2016) charater page and then I found one image for a character named God. It shows his appearance in mid season 5 finale and I accidentally spoiled myself .And the troper put in the picture is named G3ae. So I decided to label note an image ( Link here: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Characters.Lucifer2016#edit26846822
) but I was thinking if I should deleted the picture or just keep it label note.
openPossible fanfic self-promotion?
While some of ZoicAlcelaphine's edits, particularly those related to Undertale, have been pretty questionable, I have reason to believe they may be recommending their own fics on the game's Fanfic Recs page. If you look at their troper page and the FFN page for one of the authors they keep promoting
, they seem a bit too similar for it to be a coincidence (at least, it seems that way to me).
Also, the recently-created page for the fanfic The World Of Humans And Monsters, and especially its YMMV page, are tripping several red flags for me. Some of these include repeated usage of "The author believes/thinks..." and putting four instances of the canon characters getting called out under Catharsis Factor (it doesn't help that they're zero-context examples), along with including some non-YMMV tropes in the YMMV subpage as another way of going "this is why the canon characters are wrong".
Even if I'm wrong about the troper and the author being one and the same, that fic page needs serious work in order to stand as an objective page (which, considering that it's pretty much a Hate Fic that turns most of Undertale's cast into either author avatars or straw characters, may be an uphill battle). What do you think?
openDo we have a general Netflix thread somewhere?
I know we have the Netflix animation thread
, but do we have one for the live-action properties, or even just a thread about the company?
And before you ask, search is still borked. I'd look it up myself if I could.
openLarge scale editing without discussion and leaving behind quite some mess Live Action TV
So troper adonzo
has taken it upon himself to move large portions on MCU related pages.
While I am not necessarily opposed to what he did, I am opposed to how he did it, as he didn't discuss this with anybody and also left some mess behind
Biggest example: The folder for Mack is now double, both here
and here
, with no redirect.
I already PM'd him, but if he doesn't react, can his edits be reverted?
Edited by ForenperseropenI have a “just for fun” idea: Blue & Orange Wiki
I was thinking we have a death wiki, a sugar wiki, and a neutral wiki (which does need more love as we only have boil the Aesop I think on their), but what about a Blue & Orange Wiki. It’s not bad, it’s not good, it’s just strange. If people say I can create it (or if someone else does), I will dedicate quite a bit of time to make it look thorough and decent even in the starting stages. Some ideas I have for it may be inspired by the death/sugar/neutral wiki respectively. Examples include:
The page image could be a popular stoic character (doesn’t matter if they’re good, evil, neutral), shown laughing and covered with blue and orange clothing/suit/hair/etc.
Character Derailment Service: similar to the villain whitewashing service or paint the hero black service, but instead of focusing on just hero and villains and good and evenly, this page could serve to make dumb characters seem smart, Unhelpful NP Cs/Incompetent Characters/lousy sidekicks seem like they save the world, lazy characters seem like they’re diligent, etc. and vice versa using fridge logic.
Bizzaro That Aesop-twisting works that have a pretty clear aesop(regardless of whether it’s good or bad)/no aesop, and twist it into something completely nonsensical. It doesn’t matter where the actual aesop nor the bizarroed aesop starts and ends on the scale of good and evil (ex. the actual aesop can lean toward lawful good and the bizzaroed aesop can be chaotic good/beau real or evil,), as the point isn’t to make bad Aesops good, the reverse, or simplify Aesop’s, but instead it’s somewhat but not quite an inversion or boil the aesop(except while boil the Aesop’s goal is to make any aesop make sense, this would be to make any aesop seem well bizarre.
Epic Big Lipped Alligator Moments-self explanatory mostly.
Ad of Whuuut?: a bizzaro version of the ad of win/lose page, but ads featured here aren’t epically good or epically bad/yikes, but just plain bizarre.
That Cloudcuckoolander Troper-similar to that one troper and that other troper, but this troper isn’t good nor bad, and usually follows rules(though they might interpret them wrong by accident), and sometimes accidentally drifts into conversation on the main page (not on purpose like that one troper does though).
I probably will brainstorm a few more ideas but I’ve typed so much you guys might get tired.
I know that while we can start to create a works page without asking for it to be approved, we cannot create a new tropes page without going to the trope approving site, but idk about the rule of creating just for fun pages/wikis
Edited by Tvtroper8238openSimilarly Named Works
While editing, have two films with the same name Seventeen Again and Seventeen Again_ (with a _ at the end of the web address). I'm just wondering if this is something I can correct myself or holler at a mod to fix.
Edited by MegaJopenAnalysis discussion?
Is there a thread somewhere for odd Analysis pages? The one for Space Fighter has one entry (A12) that seems out of place and several points that read like the page is arguing with itself, but I'm not familiar enough with the subject to know what to change.
open Edit War, Justifying Edit, no Edit Reason
Troper Lucky-Seven-Leaf-Clover just did three offenses on Faux Action Girl: they Edit Warred, they inserted a Justifying Edit, and they deleted a large chunk of information with no Edit Reason.
- They added some Justified and Averted examples to the Sakura entry on Faux Action Girl, despite the entry already establishing that she is one, with quotes even taken from both the manga and Word of God himself stating that she is, and thus official sources were cited (as per "State the Source" in How to Write an Example). Also, the fact that they inserted a Justifying Edit to try and prove that Sakura's an Aversion with more bullets not only makes the entry too long, but it also shows character bias towards her, and I know for a fact that any bias of any kind is not allowed here. As a result, I deleted the troper's entries and explained myself.
- Unfortunately, they re-added their examples. Because they re-added their examples, that's an Edit War (Add -> Delete -> Re-add). In the same edit, they also deleted a large chunk of information from the Yu-Gi-Oh examples. This troper's edits on the page have no Edit Reason.
Here's their Edit History: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/el.php?findfor=Lucky-Seven-Leaf-Clover
openStyle Savvy title confusion Videogame
About a month ago, VampireBuddha did a major overhaul of the Style Savvy series and split the individual games into their own pages. Which wouldn't be an issue in itself, except the new pages are under their European names of Style Boutique. I'm fairly certain that American titles take precedence here, but even if they don't, there's a mismatch between the franchise name and the individual games. This is potentially a bigger project than I want to take on right now; does anyone else want to take a look?
openStrange edits on Chased Off Into the Sunset
Not sure what's going on, but some Troper (ungabunga to be precise) seems to have gone a bit overboard on the Chased Off into the Sunset page? The folders for Western Animation etc have been deleted with no reason given, and the information about the page itself has also been removed. I'm not sure if they plan to rewrite anything, but at the moment the page looks very sorry for itself. Is anyone aware of this yet?

I was wondering if Deconstruction, or other playing with tropes, have to be intentional. What if it's done by a writer who doesn't understand nor is trying to do it, but are trying to take a spin at it that winds up falling under such?